•  
  •  
 

Abstract

Nano glass ionomer cement (GIC) with nano zirconia as a raw material called zirconium is a newly developed type of restoration/tooth filling material that is used in dentistry. Objective: To examine the effect of carbonated beverages on the surface roughness of Zirconomer and GIC filling materials and determine if there was any difference between them. Methods: This is a true-experimental laboratory research study with a pre-posttest group design. The research samples consisted of 32 samples, 16 GIC samples and 16 Zirconomer samples, further divided into four time-sensitive groups: day 1, day 3, day 5, and day 7. The samples were immersed in artificial saliva and carbonated beverages for 24 hours. Surface roughness was measured using a surface roughness tester. Results: The average surface roughness from day 1 to day 7 of the GIC material immersed in carbonated beverages was 4.17 μm, which is higher than the average surface roughness of Zirconomer (3.091 μm), and the difference was significantly different (pConclusion: Zirconomer was found to be more resistant to carbonated beverages than GIC. There was a positive correlation between the length of immersion time in the carbonated beverages and the surface roughness of GIC and Zirconomer.

References

  1. Health Research and Development Office. Main results of basic health research. Ministry of Health RI; 2018.

  2. John JR, Daniel B, Panerrselvam D, Rajendran G. Prevalence of dental caries, oral hygiene knowledge, status, and practices among visually impaired individuals in Chennai, Tamil Nadu. Int J Dent. 2017:1–6.

  3. Iftikhar N, Devashish, Srivastava B, Gupta N, Ghambir N, et al. A comparative evaluation of mechanical properties of four different restorative materials. An in vitro study. Int J Clin Ped Dent. 2019;12(1):47–9.

  4. Hakim R, Lampus B, Wowor VNS. [Overview of glass ionomer cement filling on nursing academy students of TK. III Robert Wolter Mongonsidi Hospital]. J e-Gigi. 2013;1(2):2.

  5. Rizzante FAP, Cunali RS, Bombonatti JFS, Correr GM, Gonzaga CC, Furuse AY. Indications and restorative techniques for glass ionomer cement: Literature review article. RSBO J. 2015;12(1):79– 87.

  6. Abdulsamee N, Elkhadem AH. Zirconomer and zirconomer improved (white amalgam) restorative material for the future: Review article. EC Dent Sci 15.4. 2017:134–50.

  7. Kamath U, Salam A. Fracture resistance of maxillary premolars with mod cavities restored with Zirconomer: An in vitro comparative study. Int J of Appl Dent Sci. 2016;2(2):77–80.

  8. Najeeb S, Khurshid Z, Zafar MS, Khan AS, Zohaib S, et al. Modifications in glass ionomer cements: Nano-sized fillers and bioactive nanoceramics. Int J of Mol Sci. 2016:1–12.

  9. Haragap SA, Sastrodihardjo S. Nano technology in dentistry. Dentika Dent J. 2014;18(2):194-8.

  10. Waleed B, Shaibani DA, Bamusa B, Bajafar S, Eidan SA, et al. Modification of glass ionomer restorative material: A review of literature. EC Dent Sci 18.5. 2019:1001–6.

  11. Keshani F, Koroushi M. A review of glass-ionomers: From conventional glass-ionomer to bioactive glass-ionomer. Dent Res J. 2013;10(4):411–20.

  12. Sidhu SK, Nicholson JW. A review of glassionomer cement for clinic dentistry. J Funct Biomater. 2016;7(3):1–15.

  13. Ubeja S, Patel R. Consumer preference towards soft drinks: a perceptual study. PBR Int. 2014;6(9):80-6.

  14. Kregeil D. Health safety of soft drinks: Contents, containers, and microorganisms: Review article. Bio Med Res Int. 2015:1–15.

  15. Mat YZF, Alam MK, Luddin N. An in vitro study of erosive effects of commercial soft drinks on surface microhardness of tooth-colored restorative materials. Int Med J. 2014;21(1):83–5.

  16. Rajavardhan K, Sankar AJS, Kumar MGM, Kumar KR, Pranitha K, Kishore KK. Erosive potential of cola and orange fruit juice on tooth colored restorative materials. Ann Med Health Sci Res. 2014;4(3): s208–12.

  17. Hamouda IM, Ibrahim DA, Alwakeel EE. Influence of sport beverages on the properties of dental restorative glass ionomers. Int J Dent Oral Health. 2016;2(2):1–8.

  18. Bajwa NK, Pathak A. Change in surface roughness of esthetic restorative material after exposure to different immersion regimes in a cola drink: Research article. Int Sch Res Notices Dent. 2014:1–6.

  19. Diansari V, Diana SN, Cindy M. Surface roughness evaluation of conventional glass ionomer cement after immersion in carbonated drinks. Dent. J. 2016;8(2):111–6.

  20. Sakaguchi L, Powers J. Craig’s restorative dental materials, 13th ed. Elsevier Mosby; 2012:152–82. 21. Khurram M, Zafar KJ, Qaisar A, Atiq T, Khan SA. Restorative dental material: A comparative evaluation of surface microhardness of three restorative materials when exposed to acidic beverages. Prof Med J. 2018;25(1):140–9.

  21. Bala O, Arisu HD, Yikilgan I, Arslan S, Gullu A. Evaluation of surface roughness and hardness of different glass ionomer cements. Eur J of Dent. 2012;6:79–86.

Download

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.