•  
  •  
 

Abstract

In the use of Online Food Delivery Service (OFDS), an online service applying a smartphone to make it easier for users to get food quickly, it was found that the foods selected tend to be unhealthy and may increase the risk of being overweight. The aim of this study was to determine predominant and other factors that differ in food selection in OFDS among students at SMAN (State High School) 47 Jakarta in 2022. This study applied a cross-sectional study design with 112 subjects. Data were taken through a questionnaire and analyzed by using an X²- test and multiple logistic regression. This study shows that 58.9% of students chose foods categorized as high in fat, salt, and sugar (HFSS) with fried chicken as the food type chosen the most. Bivariate results show that gender, reward sensitivity, OFDS frequency, and reduction in price, are all significantly different in the selection of foods ordered through OFDS. A multiple logistic regression analysis shows OFDS frequency as a predominant factor (OR=6,89). This study suggests that the school may collaborate with public health centers district health offices or colleges in nutritional sciences on providing nutrition education. This study also suggests that the government must apply high taxes on HFSS foods.

References

  1. Bowen L, Taylor AE, Sullivan R, Ebrahim S, Kinra S, Krishna KR, et al. Associations between diet, physical activity and body fat distribution: A cross sectional study in an Indian population. BMC Public Health. 2015;15(1).
  2. Wellard-Cole L, Davies A, Allman-Farinelli M. Contribution of foods prepared away from home to intakes of energy and nutrients of public health concern in adults: a systematic review. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2021 Feb;1– 12.
  3. Suryadi DF, Ilyas MIF. Adopsi E-commerce Food Delivery Service Bagi Wirausaha Pemula. Ilmu Adm Akuntansi, Bisnis, Dan Hum. 2018;2018:75–80.
  4. Statista. eServices Report 2021 - Online Food Delivery. 2021.
  5. We Are Social & Hootsuite. The Digital 2021 Global Overview Report. 2021.
  6. JAKPAT. Food Delivery Service JAKPAT Survey Report (Updated – 2017). 2017.
  7. Brown JE. Nutrition Through the Life Cycle. Cengage Learning; 2016.
  8. Jiang Y, Wang J, Wu S, Li N, Wang Y, Liu J, et al. Association between take-out food consumption and obesity among chinese university students: A cross-sectional study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(6).
  9. Atmarita, Jahari AB, Sudikno, Soekatri M. Asupan Gula, Garam, Dan Lemak Di Indonesia. Gizi Indones. 2016;39(1):1–14.
  10. Lemeshow S. Sampling of Populations: Methods and Applications. 3th Ed. New York: Wiley-Interscience; 1997.
  11. Martha E, Ayubi D, Besral B, Rahmawati ND, Mayangsari AP, Sopamena Y, et al. Online Food Delivery Services Among Young Adults in Depok: Factors Affecting the Frequency of Online Food Ordering and Consumption of High-risk Food. Sci Rep. 2022;1–11.
  12. Maulida R, Nanishi K, Green J, Shibanuma A, Jimba M. Foodchoice motives of adolescents in Jakarta, Indonesia: The roles of gender and family income. Public Health Nutr. 2016;19(15):2760– 8.
  13. Missagia SV, Oliveira SR De, Rezende DC De. Food Choice Motives and Healthy Eating : Assessing Gender differences. XXXVI Encontro da ANPAD. 2012;1–13.
  14. Ree M, Riediger N, Moghadasian MH. Factors affecting food selection in Canadian population. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2008;62(11):1255–62.
  15. Share M, Stewart-Knox B. Determinants of food choice in Irish adolescents. Food Qual Prefer. 2012;25(1):57–62.
  16. De Cock N, Van Lippevelde W, Vervoort L, Vangeel J, Maes L, Eggermont S, et al. Sensitivity to reward is associated with snack and sugar-sweetened beverage consumption in adolescents. Eur J Nutr. 2016;55(4):1623–32.
  17. Ross KM, Eastman A, Ugwoaba UA, Demos KE, Lillis J, Wing RR. Food reward sensitivity, impulsivity, and weight change during and after a 3-month weight loss program. PLoS One. 2020 Dec;15(12):e0243530–e0243530.
  18. Albert D, Steinberg L. Judgment and Decision Making in Adolescence. J Res Adolesc. 2011 Mar;21(1):211–24.
  19. Vanhelst J, Béghin L, Drumez E, Duhamel A, De Henauw S, Ruiz JR, et al. Adolescents’ diet quality in relation to their relatives’ and peers’ diet engagement and encouragement: The Healthy Lifestyle in Europe by Nutrition in Adolescence (HELENA) study. Public Health Nutr. 2018;21(17):3192–201.
  20. Critchlow N, Newberry Le Vay J, MacKintosh AM, Hooper L, Thomas C, Vohra J. Erratum: Correction: Critchlow, N., et al. Adolescents’ Reactions to Adverts for Fast-Food and Confectionery Brands That Are High in Fat, Salt, and/or Sugar (HFSS), and Possible Implications for Future Research and Regulation: Findings from a Cross-Sectio. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(6):1–16.
  21. Abdelhamied HHS. The effects of sales promotion on post promotion behaviors and brand preferences in fast food restaurants. Tourismos. 2013;8(1):93–113.

Bahasa Abstract

Dalam penggunaan Online Food Delivery Service (OFDS), layanan online yang menerapkan smartphone untuk memudahkan pengguna mendapatkan makanan dengan cepat, ditemukan bahwa makanan yang dipilih cenderung tidak sehat dan dapat meningkatkan risiko kegemukan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui faktor predominan dan faktor lain yang membedakan pemilihan makanan OFDS pada siswa SMAN 47 Jakarta tahun 2022. Penelitian ini menggunakan desain studi potong lintang dengan 112 subjek. Data diambil melalui kuesioner dan dianalisis menggunakan uji X²- dan regresi logistik berganda. Berdasarkan hasil analisis univariat, diketahui sebanyak 58,9% siswa memilih makanan tinggi Gula Garam Lemak (GGL) untuk dikonsumsi melalui layanan OFD dengan pilihan makanan jenis terbanyak adalah fried chicken. Hasil bivariat menunjukkan bahwa jenis kelamin, sensitivitas penghargaan, frekuensi OFDS, dan penurunan harga, semuanya berbeda secara signifikan pada pemilihan makanan yang dipesan melalui OFDS. Analisis regresi logistik berganda menunjukkan frekuensi OFDS sebagai faktor dominan (OR=6,89). Penelitian ini menyarankan agar pihak sekolah dapat bekerjasama dengan puskesmas atau perguruan tinggi di bidang ilmu gizi dalam memberikan pendidikan gizi. Penelitian ini juga menyarankan bahwa pemerintah harus menerapkan pajak yang tinggi pada makanan tinggi GGL.

Download

Share

COinS