Abstract
The multilateral frameworks governing the recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards, such as the New York Convention 1958 (the Convention), along with the domestic laws of most states, are generally designed to promote the efficient enforcement of foreign arbitral awards. However, practical experience reveals inconsistencies in application. While many states adhere to international principles, some - despite being signatories to the Convention - have exploited the broad concept of public policy to unjustifiably refuse enforcement within their jurisdictions. Conversely, other states have adopted a more restrictive approach, limiting the public policy exception to ensure predictability in enforcement. This article focuses on the use of the public policy exception in France and Singapore, where courts have developed relatively clear frameworks. By analyzing these jurisdictions, the article identifies lessons that could enhance Vietnam’s legal framework, particularly in aligning domestic regulations with international standards and limiting the scope of the public policy exception to prevent misuse.
References
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Journal Articles and Periodicals
Antonio F. Perez, “The International Recognition of Judgments : The Debate between Private and Public Law Solutions”, Berkeley Journal of International Law, Vol. 19 (2001): 44-89.
Jennifer Kirby, “What is an award anyway?” Journal of International Arbitration, vol. 31, no. 4 (2014): 475–84
Karl-Heinz Böckstiegel, “Public Policy as a Limit to Arbitration and Its Enforcement”, IBA” s Dispute Resolution International, “The New York Convention – 50 years,” Special Issue (2008): 123-133.
Mateo Miguel Verdias, “Arbitration and the Fight Against Corruption in Contracts: A Proposal to Reform the UNCITRAL Model Law,” The Journal of the Institute for Transnational Arbitration, volume 4, issue 2 (2022): 1-29.
Nadia Dridi, “The Enforcement of Foreign Arbitration Awards in Vietnam: Overview and Criticisms”, Harvard International Law Journal, Vol. 59 Online Journal (2017): 15-21.
Ramona Martinez, “Recognition and Enforcement of International Arbitral Awards under the United Nations Convention of 1958: The Refusal Provisions,” International Lawyer, vol.24, No.2 (1990): 487-518.
William S. Dodge, “International Comity in American Law”, Columbia Law Review, Vol. 115, No. 8 (2015): 2074-2075.
Books and Book Chapters
Emmanuel Gaillard, John Savage, Fouchard, Gaillard, Goldman On International Commercial Arbitration. Kluwer Law International, 1999.
George A. Bermann, “Recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards,” in International Arbitration and Private International Law edited by Bermann, George A., 551–632. Brill Publishing, 2017.
Ho Chi Minh City University of Law, Textbook of Private International Law - General Part (Giáo trình Tư pháp quốc tế - Phần chung). Ho Chi Minh City National University Press, 2010.
Huseyin Alper Tosun, “The United States, Arbitration and Public Policy,” in Dissertation on Public Policy Concepts in International Arbitration, Huseyin Alper Tosun ed. University of California: the California Digital Library, 2019.
Jack Graves & Yelena Davydan, Competence-Competence and Separability—American Style, in International Arbitration and International Commercial Law: Synergy, Chapter 8, Convergence and Evolution 8, 2011.
Sae Youn Kim & Marieke Minkkinen, “An Asian Perspective on the Enforcement of Annulled Awards”, in International Arbitration and the Rule of Law: Contribution and Conformity, ICCA Congress series, Vol 19, edited by Andrea Menaker. Kluwer Law International, 2017.
UNCITRAL Secretariat, Guide on the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards. United Nations Publication, 2016.
Web Sources
Leslie Chew, “Public Policy — The Ride of the Unruly Steed on the Highway of International Arbitration,” Law Gazette (Singapore) (Dec. 2003), accessed 22 December 2024, https://v1.lawgazette.com.sg/2003-12/Dec03-col2.htm.
Margaret Moses, “Public Policy: National, International and Transnational,” accessed 14 January 2025, https://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2018/11/12/public-policy-national-international-and-transnational/?utm_source=chatgpt.com.
Ministry of Justice of Vietnam & UNDP, “Assessment Report Comparing Vietnamese Law on Recognition and Enforcement of Arbitral Awards with the UNCITRAL Model Law, Proposing the Possibility of Applying the Model Law in Vietnam,” (Báo cáo đánh giá, so sánh quy định pháp luật Việt Nam về công nhận và cho thi hành phán quyết trọng tài với Luật mẫu UNCITRAL, đề xuất khả năng áp dụng Luật mẫu tại Việt Nam) (2019), accessed 22 December 2024, https://moj.gov.vn/tttp/tintuc/Lists/NghienCuuTraoDoi/Attachments/61/B%C3%A1o%20c%C3%A1o%20nghi%C3%AAn%20c%E1%BB%A9u%20c%E1%BB%A7a%20chuy%C3%AAn%20gia%20%C4%91%E1%BB%99c%20l%E1%BA%ADp.pdf.
Peterson, P., “The French Law Standard of Review for Conformity of Awards with International Public Policy Where Corruption Is Alleged: Is the Requirement of a “Flagrant” Breach Now Gone?” Kluwer Arbitration Blog (Dec. 10, 2014), accessed 22 December 2024, https://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2014/12/10/the-french-law-standard-of-review-for-conformity-of-awards-with-international-public-policy-where-corruption-is-alleged-is-the-requirement-of-a-flagrant-breach-now-gone/.
The United Nations Treaty Collection, “Contracting States,” accessed 14 January 2025, https://www.newyorkconvention.org/contracting-states/contracting-states.
Truong Nhat Quang et al., “Foreign Court Judgments and Arbitral Awards in Vietnam” (Bản Án của Tòa Án và Phán Quyết của Trọng Tài Nước Ngoài tại Việt Nam) (2020), access 22 October 2024, https://ykvn-law.com/vi/ban-an-cua-toa-an-va-phan-quyet-cua-trong-tai-nuoc-ngoai-tai-viet-nam/.
Recommended Citation
Phan, Hoai Nam
(2025)
"Public Policy And the Refusal to Enforce Foreign Arbitral Awards: A Comparative Analysis of France, Singapore, and Vietnam,"
Indonesian Journal of International Law: Vol. 22:
No.
4, Article 2.
Available at:
https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/ijil/vol22/iss4/2
Included in
Conflict of Laws Commons, Dispute Resolution and Arbitration Commons, International Law Commons