•  
  •  
 

Abstract

The multilateral frameworks governing the recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards, such as the 1958 New York Convention, along with the domestic laws of most states, are generally designed to promote the efficient enforcement of foreign arbitral awards. However, practical experience reveals inconsistencies in its application. While many states adhere to international principles, some - despite being signatories to the Convention - have exploited the broad concept of public policy to unjustifiably refuse enforcement within their jurisdictions. Conversely, other states have adopted a more restrictive approach, limiting the public policy exception to ensure predictability in enforcement. This article focuses on the use of the public policy exception in France and Singapore, where courts have developed relatively clear frameworks. By analyzing these jurisdictions, the article identifies lessons that could enhance Vietnam’s legal framework, particularly in aligning domestic regulations with international standards and limiting the scope of the public policy exception to prevent misuse. The article begins by introducing the topic and outlining the research objectives. It then provides a comprehensive examination of the laws and regulations of both France and Singapore regarding the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards, focusing on their respective approaches to public policy in arbitration. Finally, Section IV analyzes Vietnam’s current legal framework, offering insights and recommendations drawn from the experiences of France and Singapore to enhance Vietnam’s approach to international arbitration. The article proposes reform measures to align Vietnam’s enforcement framework with global arbitration norms to bolster legal certainty for foreign investors and promote Vietnam as an arbitration-friendly jurisdiction.

References

Journal Articles and Periodicals

Böckstiegel, Karl-Heinz. “Public Policy as a Limit to Arbitration and Its Enforcement,” IBA Journal of Dispute Resolution 2008, (2008): 1-10

Chan. Darius, and Ngai Hum Khong. Elias, “Re-calibration of curial intervention in public policy challenges against arbitral awards.” Journal of International Arbitration 41, no. 3 (2024): 271-316

Chng, Kenny. “A theoretical perspective of the public policy doctrine in the conflict of laws.” Journal of Private International Law 14, no. 1 (2018): 130-159. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441048.2018.1437328

Chittasuphang Tontipiromya. “The public policy exception to the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards in Thailand.” Accessed 22 April 2025, https://rune.une.edu.au/server/api/core/bitstreams/afa04bc8-36ea-45ee-97d8-e67f1fc84203/content

Doge, William S. “International Comity in American Law,” Columbia Law Review 115, no. 8 (2015): 2071-2142.

Dridi, Nadia. “The Enforcement of Foreign Arbitration Awards in Vietnam: Overview and Criticisms.” Harvard International Law Journal 59, (2017): 13-21

Do, Van Dai. “Proposal for the Abandonment of the Writing Requirement for Arbitration Agreements in National Laws.” Vietnamese Journal of Legal Sciences 2, no. 1 (2024): 16-44

Gaillard, Emmanuel. “La corruption saisie par les arbitres du commerce international [Corruption seized by international trade arbitrators].” Revue de l’arbitrage 2017, no. 3 (2017): 805 – 838.

Liu, Margaret and Sangare, Yassine. “10 Years on with French Arbitration Law Reform: Does the Judicial Control Frustrate or Facilitate the Enforcement of Arbitral Awards?” International Arbitration Law Review 26, no. 1 (2023): 29-50.

Martinez, Ramona. “Recognition and Enforcement of International Arbitral Awards under the United Nations Convention of 1958: The Refusal Provisions.” International Lawyer 24, no. 2 (1990): 487-518.

Mayer Pierre, Chapter 2: Effect of International Public Policy in International Arbitration in Julian D.M. Lew and Loukas A. Mistelis (eds), Pervasive Problems in International Arbitration, International Arbitration Law Library, Volume 15 (Kluwer Law International 2006), 61 – 69.

Miguel Verdias, Mateo. “Arbitration and the Fight Against Corruption in Contracts: A Proposal to Reform the UNCITRAL Model Law.” The Journal of the Institute for Transnational Arbitration 4, no. 2 (2022): 1-30.

Perez, Antonio F. “The International Recognition of Judgments: The Debate between Private and Public Law Solutions.” Berkeley Journal of International Law 19, (2001): 44-89.

Salgado, Jaimee , “Shall We Dance? How Arbitral Tribunals and National Judiciaries Can Move in Tandem to Stop Corruption While Not Stepping on the Other’s Toes,” Fordham International Law Journal Vol. 48, no. 109 (2024), 109-151.

Sitorus, Winner. “Judicial control of foreign arbitral awards in Indonesia.” Indonesian Journal of International Law 14, no. 4, Article 6 (2017): 543-576.

Books and Book Chapters

Baizeau, Domitille and Hayes, Tessa. “The Arbitral Tribunal’s Duty and Power to Address Corruption Sua Sponte” in International Arbitration and the Rule of Law: Contribution and Conformity ICCA Congress series No. 19, edited by Andrea Menaker, -- The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2017.

Born, Gary B. International Commercial Arbitration, 3rd ed. The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2021.

Graves, Jack & Davydan, Yelena. “Competence-Competence and Separability—American Style,” in International Arbitration and International Commercial Law: Synergy, Convergence, and Evolution edited by Stefan Kröll et al, 157-178. The Hague: Kluwer International Law, 2011.

George A. Bermann, “Recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards,” in International Arbitration and Private International Law, Bermann, edited by George A. Bermann, 1-79. Leiden: Brill Publishing, 2017.

Ho Chi Minh City University of Law, Giáo trình Tư pháp quốc tế - Phần chung [Textbook of Private International Law - General Part]. Ho Chi Minh City: National University Press, 2010.

Kim, Sae Youn. & Minkkinen, Marieke. “An Asian Perspective on the Enforcement of Annulled Awards” in International Arbitration and the Rule of Law: Contribution and Conformity, ICCA Congress series No. 19, edited by Andrea Menaker, eds, 382-421. The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2017.

Tosun, Huseyin Alper. “The United States, Arbitration and Public Policy” in Dissertation on Public Policy Concepts in International Arbitration, edited by Huseyin Alper Tosun, 57-81. University of California: the California Digital Library, 2019.

UNCITRAL Secretariat. UNCITRAL Secretariat Guide on the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards. Vienna: United Nations Publication, 2016.

Legal Documents

France. The Code of Civil Procedure.

Glencore International A.G. and C.I. Prodeco S.A. v. Republic of Colombia (2019), ICSID Case No. ARB/16/6, Final Award of 27 August 2019.

High People’s Court in Hanoi, Decision No. 84/2017/KDTM-PT (2017).

ICC Case No. 14470, Final Award (2013), Collection of ICC Arbitral Awards, Vol. VI (2013) 945.

Metal-Tech Ltd. v. Republic of Uzbekistan (2013), ICSID Case No. ARB/10/3, Final Award of 4 October 2013.

Nam Dinh Provincial People’s Court, Decision No. 02/2017/VKDTM-ST (2017)

Paris Court of Appeal. Sté M. Schneider Schältegerätebau und Elektroinstallationen GmbH v. Sté CPL Industries Ltd. (2009)

Singapore. The High Court of Singapore: John Holland Pty Ltd v Toyo Engineering Corp [2001] 1 SLR(R) 443.

The High Court of Singapore, Galsworthy Ltd of the Republic of Liberia v Glory Wealth Shipping Pte Ltd (2011) 1 SLR 727,

The Court of Appeal of Singapore, AJU v AJT [2011] SGCA 41,

The International Commercial Court of Singapore: CKG v CKH [2021] 5 SLR 84.

The High Court of Singapore: Beijing Sinozonto Mining Investment Co Ltd v Goldenray Consortium (Singapore) Pte Ltd [2013] SGHC 248.

The People’s Court of Nam Dinh Province, Decision No. 02/2017/VKDTM-ST (2017).

The People’s High Court of Hanoi, Decision No. 84/2017/KDTM-PT (2017)

Vietnam. The Code of Civil Procedure. Act No. 92/2015/QH13 of 2015.

Vietnam. Decision No. 453/QD-CTN of 28 Jul. 1995.

Web Sources

French Court of Cassation. “Cour de Cassation, Chambre civile 1, du 6 janvier 1987, 84-17.274, Publié au bulletin.” Accessed 22 December 2024, https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/juri/id/JURITEXT000007017771.

French Court of Cassation. “Cour de cassation, civile, Chambre civile 1, 12 février 2014, 10-17.076, Publié au bulletin.” accessed 23 April 2025, https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/juri/id/JURITEXT000028604051/.

French Court of Cassation. “Cour de cassation, Pourvoi No. 17/17981.” accessed 14 January 2025, https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/juri/id/JURITEXT000045421983.

Leslie Chew. “Public Policy — The Ride of the Unruly Steed on the Highway of International Arbitration.” accessed 22 December 2024, https://v1.lawgazette.com.sg/2003-12/Dec03-col2.htm.

Margaret Moses. “Public Policy: National, International and Transnational.” Accessed 14 January 2025, https://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2018/11/12/public-policy-national-international-and-transnational/.

Ministry of Justice of Vietnam and UNDP. “Báo cáo đánh giá, so sánh quy định pháp luật Việt Nam về công nhận và cho thi hành phán quyết trọng tài với Luật mẫu UNCITRAL, đề xuất khả năng áp dụng Luật mẫu tại Việt Nam [Assessment Report Comparing Vietnamese Law on Recognition and Enforcement of Arbitral Awards with the UNCITRAL Model Law, Proposing the Possibility of Applying the Model Law in Vietnam].” Accessed 22 December 2024, https://moj.gov.vn/tttp/tintuc/Lists/NghienCuuTraoDoi/Attachments/61/B%C3%A1o%20c%C3%A1o%20nghi%C3%AAn%20c%E1%BB%A9u%20c%E1%BB%A7a%20chuy%C3%AAn%20gia%20%C4%91%E1%BB%99c%20l%E1%BA%ADp.pdf

Ministry of Justice. “Cơ sở dữ liệu về công nhận và cho thi hành bản án, quyết định của tòa án nước ngoài, quyết định của trọng tài nước ngoài tại Việt Nam được Bộ Tư pháp công bố vào ngày 25 tháng 9 năm 2020 [Database on Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Court Judgments and Decisions, Foreign Arbitral Awards in Vietnam published by the Ministry of Justice on 25 September 2020].” Accessed 22 October 2024, https://moj.gov.vn/tttp/Pages/dlcn-va-th-tai-Viet-Nam.aspx.

Paris Court of Appeal. “Sté Gulf Leaders for Management and Services Holding Company v. SA Crédit Foncier de France, No. 12/17681.” accessed 22 October 2024, https://jusmundi.com/en/document/decision/fr-credit-foncier-de-france-v-gulf-leaders-for-management-and-services-holding-company-arret-de-la-cour-dappel-de-paris-pole-1-chambre-1-12-17681-tuesday-4th-march-2014.

Paris Court of Appeal. “Congo v. SA Commissions Import Export, No. 13/03410.” accessed 14 January 2025, https://jusmundi.com/fr/document/decision/fr-commission-import-export-s-a-c-la-republique-du-congo-arret-de-la-cour-dappel-de-paris-pole-1-chambre-10-23-09300-thursday-19th-september-2024.

Singapore. International Arbitration Act 1994 (“IAA”), amended in 2021. Available at https://sso.agc.gov.sg/act/iaa1994.

Singapore. Arbitration Act 2001 (“AA”), enacted in 2001, amended in 2020 Accessed 22 December 2024, https://sso.agc.gov.sg/Act/AA2001.

The High Court of Singapore. “Singapore / 29 September 1995 / Singapore, High Court / Re An Arbitration Between Hainan Machinery Import and Export Corp and Donald & McArthy Pte Ltd / [1995] SGHC 232, Originating Summons No 1056 of 1994.” accessed 22 October 2024, https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=4167&opac_view=6.

Truong Nhat Quang et al. “Bản Án của Tòa Án và Phán Quyết của Trọng Tài Nước Ngoài tại Việt Nam [Foreign Court Judgments and Arbitral Awards in Vietnam].” accessed 22 October 2024, https://ykvn-law.com/vi/ban-an-cua-toa-an-va-phan-quyet-cua-trong-tai-nuoc-ngoai-tai-viet-nam/.

United Nations Commission On International Trade Law. “Status: Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (New York, 1958) (the “New York Convention”).” accessed 22 December 2024 https://uncitral.un.org/en/texts/arbitration/conventions/foreign_arbitral_awards/status2.

Other Sources

Interview with Mr. Fred Burke from Baker Mckenzie in Vietnam, Managing Partner, 09 June 2015.

Download

Share

COinS