Judicialization In and Around the South China Sea
This article examines why international legal dispute settlement procedures are traditionally less frequently resorted to in Southeast Asia, compared to other regions. It also analyzes why and how, since the beginning of this century, international legal cases, both judicial and arbitral, have been consistently used for settling maritime disputes in and around the South China Sea. Then, it presents prescriptive suggestions for further use of judicial and arbitral procedures. The method of analysis is based upon the examination and scrutiny of factual materials, including relevant international cases regarding the region, as well as interviews engaged by the author with officials and experts in the region. Universal trends and experience of judicial procedures will be deductively analyzed. The article first summarizes conditions and characteristics in the Asian region, particularly Southeast Asia, where the South China Sea is located. It, secondly, examines the factual basis for international legal cases involving the region, especially from the viewpoint as to how relevant States decided to resort to legal processes, as well as how judgments and awards affect ex post relations between parties. Finally, the article will examine more universal dimensions for the use of judicial or arbitral procedures, particularly factors and elements which encourage the State to resort to such procedures.
Books/Book chapters in edited books/Journal articles
Abbot, Kenneth W, et al, “The Concept of Legalization,” International Organization 54, no.3. (2000): 401-.
Ahman, Mohamman Zaki and Kelana, Amusafir, “An Inter-State Maritime Territorial Conflict, A study on Malaysia’s Conflict Resolution through Peaceful Means,” Jurnal Sosisohumaniora 7, no.2. (July 2005): 93-109.
Alexandra C Traviss, “Temple of Preah Vihear: Lessons on Provisional Measures,” Chicago Journal of International Law 13. (2012).
Alter, Karen K, “Do International Courts Enhance Compliance with International Law?” Review of Asian and Pacific Studies 25.(2018).
Anton, Donald, “The Timor Sea Treaty Arbitration: Timor-Leste Challenges Australian Espionage and Seizure of Documents,” ASIL Insights 18, no.6, (26 February 2014).
ASEAN Secretariat, ASEAN welcomes Cambodia-Thai firm commitment to avoid further clashes, Jakarta (22 February 2011).
Askandar, Kamarulzam an and Sukim, Cariervin, “Making Peace over a Disputed Territory in Southeast Asia: Lessons from the Batu Puteh/Pedra Branca Case,” Journal of Territorial and Maritime Studies 3, no.1. MacFarland and Company, January (2016): 65-85.
Banks, Nigel, “Settling the Maritime Boundaries between Timor-Leste and Australia in the Timor Sea,” Journal of World Energy Law and Business 11.(2018):387-.
Barnett, Michelle, “Cambodia v Thailand, A Case Study on the Use of Provisional Measures to Protect Human Rights in International Border Disputes,” Brooklyn Journal of International Law 38.(2012).
Basu, Prantnashree, “The Eastern Corridor and the Law of the Sea: Ensuring Sea-lane Security,” Occasional Papers (1 December 2020).
Beckman, Robert, “The UN Convention on the Law of the Sea and the Maritime Disputes in the South China Sea,” AJIL 107. (2013):142-.
――― and Bernard, Leonardo, “Disputed Area in the south China Sea, Prospects for Arbitration or Advisory Opinion,” in The South China Sea, A Crucible of Regional Cooperation or Conflict-Making Sovereignty Claims, edited by C Jenner et trans Truong Thuy, CUP, 2016.
Beckman, Robert C and Davenport, Tara, CLCS submissions and claims in the South China Sea (16 August 2011).
Beeson, Mark, “East Asia’s Institutional Inadequacies and Great Power Rivalry in the South China Sea,” in ed. US-China Competition and the South China Sea Dispute, edited by Huiyun Feng and Kai He, 134-. London: Routledge, 2018.
BenarNews (Jakarta, 5 October 2021).
Benda, Harry J, “The Structure of Southeast Asian History: Some Preliminary Observations,” Journal of Southeast Asian History 3, no. 3. (1962): 106-138.
Benson, Simon A, “Fragmentation or Coherence? Does International Dispute Settlement Achieve Comprehensive Justice?” International Journal of Law and Public Administration 3, no.1. (2020).
Boyle, Alan E, “Dispute Settlement and the Law of the Sea Convention: Problems of Fragmentation and Jurisdiction,” International and Comparative Law Quarterly 46 (1997):37.
Brown, Christopher, “A Comparative and Critical Assessment of Estoppel in International Law,” University of Miami Law Review 50. (1996).
Chemillier-Gendreau, Monique, A propos de l’effectivité en droit international (2016).
“China Fires Ballistic Missiles around Taiwan after Nancy Pelosi’s Trip,” Financial Times (4 August 2022).
Ching, Chang,”Is there no South China Sea Air Defence Identification Zone? “(23 November 2020).
Chong Ja Ian, “ASEAN’s Non-Intervention and the Myanmar Conundrum,” ASEAN Focus, Jakarta, (2021): 6.
CNN Indonesia (Jakarta, 13 Sep. 2021).
Copeland, Carla S, “The Use of Arbitration to Settle Territorial Disputes,” Fordham Law Review 67. (1999):3074-.
D’Amoto, Anthony, “Consent, Estoppel, and Reasonableness: Three Challenges to Universal International Law,” Virginia Journal of International Law1 10. (1969):1.
Daulay, Zainul, “Soverignty over Pulau Ligitan and Pulau Sipadan (Indonesia/Malaysia), ” Law Reform, Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum & Pembangunan, II, no.1. (February 2021):119-.
de Bouyon Matignon, Luis, Estoppel in Public International Law (2019). Chesterman, Simon, “Asia’s Ambivalence about International Law and Institutions: Past, Present and Future,” European Journal of International Law 27, no.4.(2017): 945-.
de Brabandere, Weric, International Dispute Settlement, From Practice to Legal Discipline, Cambridge University Press, 2018.
de Tréglodé, Benoît, “Maritime Boundary Delimitation and Sino-Vietnamese Cooperation in the Gulf of Tonkin (1994-2016),” China Perspectives, Centre d’étude française sur la Chine contemporaine (2016).
Dispute Settlement Procedures of the Draft OECD Multilateral Investment Agreement, Journal of World Trade (1999).
Distefano, Giovanni, “La notion de titre juridique et les différends territoriaux dans l’ordre international,” Editions A, Paris: Pedone, 1995.
―――, “Border Disputes and their Resolution according to International Law : the Qatar-Bahrain Case,” Emirates Lecture Series 59, Abu Dhabi: Emirates Centre for Strategic Studies and Research, 2005.
Dolven, Ben, et al, “Maritime Territorial Disputes in East Asia, Issue for Congress,” Congressional Research Paper (14 May 2014).
Dörr, Dieter, “The Background of the Theory of Discovery,” American Indian Law Review 38, no.2. (2014).
Downs, George W, “Enforcement and the Evolution of Cooperation,” Michigan Journal of International Law 19, no.2. (1998):319.
Fangyin, Zhou, “Between Assertiveness and Self-restraint: Understanding China’s South China Sea Policy,” International Affairs 92, no.4. (2016):869-.
Fravel, M Tailor, “China’s Strategy in the South China Sea,” Contemporary Southeast Asia 33, no.3. (2011):292-.
Frederick, Shane,et al, “Time Discounting and Time Preference: A Critical Review,” Journal of Economic Literature 40, no.2. (June 2002):351-.
French, Duncan, “Case Note, In the Matter of South China Sea Arbitration: Republic of Philippines v People’s Republic of China,” Environmental Law Review (2016).
Gao, Zhinguo and Jia, Bing Bing, “The Nine-Dash Line in the South China Sea: History, Status, and implications,” 107 AJIL 107. (2013): 8-.
Ginsburg, Tom and McAdams, Richard H, “Adjudicating in Anarchy: An Expressive Theory of International Dispute Resolution,” William & Mary Law Review 45, no.4. (2003-2004):1229-.
Gnanasagaran, Angaindrankumar, “Pedra Branca Dispute Reveals Disconnect between Malaysia and Singapore,” The ASEAN Post (12 January 2021).
Gonzales, Robin, The Spratly Islands Disputes: International Law, Conflicting Claims, and Alternative Frameworks for Dispute Resolution, University of Nevada, 2014.
Government of China, Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Wang Wenbin’s Regular Press Conference (8 August 2022).
Guzman, Andrew T,” International Tribunals: Rational Choice Analysis,” Article (2008).
―――, The Cost of Credibility: Explaining Resistance to Inter-Space Dispute Resolution Mechanism (2001).
Hayton, Bill, “How to Solve the South China Sea Disputes,“ ISEAS 25, Singapore: Yusof Ishak Institute (2022).
Heine-Geldern, R, “Conception of State and Kingship in Southeast Asia,” Data Paper 18, Cornell University (1956).
Helfer, Laurence R and Slaughter, Anne-Marie, “Why States Create International Tribunals: A Response to Professors Posner and Yoo,” California Law Review 93. (2005):3-.
Hendrapati, Marcel, “Implication of the ICJ Decision respecting Sipadan Ligitan case towards basepoints and maritime delimitation,” International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research 14, no.1. (UJSBAR, 2014): 374-.
Henry, Etienne, “Alleged Acquiescence of the International Community to Revisionist Claims of International Customary Law, with Special Reference to the Just Contra Bellum Regime,” Melbourne Journal of International Law 18, no.2. (2017).
Hernandez, Juan Pablo, “The Legality of Espionage in International Law,” The Treaty Examiner, issue 1, (April 2020):31-.
Hohen, Marcelo,” Original Title in the Light of the ICJ Judgment on Sovereignty over Pedera Branca/Pulau Batu Putech, Middle Rocks and South Ledge,” Journal of the History of International Law 15. (2013):151-171.
Huh, Sokyon, “Title to Territory in the Post-colonial Era, Original Title and Terra Nullius in the ICJ Judgments on Cases concerning Ligitan/Sipadan, 2003 and Pedra Branca, 2008,” European Journal of International Law 26, no.3. (2016).
International Court of Justice, Handbook, Maubeuge, 2014.
Ishizuka, Chisa, “Jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice under Compromissory Clauses of Multilateral Treaties: Some Relationships between Court Judicial Policy and Parties’ Judicial Strategies,” Hitotsubashi Journal of Law and International Studies 1, Tokyo (2002):355-.
Jenne, Nicole, “Managing Territorial Disputes in Southeast Asia: Is There More Than the South China Sea?” Journal of Current Southeast Asia Affair 3. (2017): 35-61.
Jenner, C and Trans Truong Thuy eds, The South China Sea, A Crucible of Regional Cooperation or Conflict-Making Sovereignty Claims, CUP, 2016.
Joint Press Statement; Eight Meeting of the Malaysia-Singapore Joint Technical Committee on the Implementation of the International Court of Justice Judgment on Pedra Branca, Middle Rocks and South Ledge (22 January 2020).
Joshi, Manoj, “The South China Sea Disputes, Territorial Claims, Geopolitics, and International Law, Occasional Papers,” Nikkei Asian Review (8 August 2016).
Juong, Wendy N, “Following the Path of Oil: The Law of the Sea or Realpolitik-What Good Does law Do in the South China Sea Territorial Conflicts?” Fordham International Law Journal 30, no.4.(2006):5-.
Klein, Natalie, “The Vicissitudes of Dispute Settlement under the Law of the Sea Convention,” International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law 32, Leiden (2017):332-.
―――, “Land and Sea: Resolving Contested Lands and Disappearing Land Disputes under the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea,” University of New South Wales Law Research Series, Sydney (2019).
―――, “The Timor Sea Conciliation and Lessons for Northeast Asia in Resolving Maritime Boundary Disputes,” Journal of Territorial and Maritime Studies 6.(2019):30-.
Koh, Tommy, Lecture on International Law, Southeast Asia Lecture Hall, Foreign Policy Community of Indonesia, Jakarta, 8 August 2022 (online lecture).
――― and Lin, Jolene, Speeches, “The Land Reclamation Case: Thoughts and Reflections,” Singapore Yearbook of International Law (2006).
Kopela, Sophia, “Historic Titles and Historic Rights in the Law of the Sea in the light of the South China Sea Arbitration,” Ocean Development and International Law 48. (2017).
Koskenniemi, Martti and Leino, Päivi, “Fragmentation of International Law ? Postmodern Anxieties,” Leiden Journal of International Law 15.(2002):553-.
Lesaffer, Randall, “Argument from Roman Law in Current International Law: Occupation and Acquisitive Prescription,” European Journal of International Law 16, no.1.(2005).
Li, Zhenni, “International Intertemporal Law,” California Western International Journal 48, no.2. (2018) :342-.
Ling, Bing, “China’s Attitude to the International Legal Order in the Xi Era: The Case of the South China Sea,” Japan Institute of International Affairs (2018).
Loperla, Sophia, “The Legal Value of Silence as State Conduct in the Jurisprudence of International Tribunal,” Australian Year Book of International Law 29. (2011).
“Malaysia accepts Ruling on Pedra Branca, says Mahathir,” The Straits Times (25 June 2029).
Masuo, Chisako, Chugoku no Kodo-Genri (China’s Behavioral Principles, Japanese language, translated by the author, Tokyo: Chuko-Shinsho, 2019.
Merrills, J G, International Dispute Settlement, Cambridge: Grotius, 2002.
Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Singapore, Transcript of Press Conference by Foreign Minister Prof S Jayakumar and Mah Bow Tan (9 October 2003).
Mitchel, Martin D, “The South China Sea, A Geographical Analysis,” Journal of Geography and Geology 8, no. 3, Canadian Centre of Science and Education (2016):1.2.
Morales, Neil Jerome, “Philippines turns up heat on China over boats massing in South China Sea,” The Jakarta Post (6 April 2021).
Nakatani, Kazuhiro, “The South China Sea Arbitration Award and the Rule of Law in the Seas” (Japanese language, title translated by the author) International Affairs 659 (2017).
Natalegawa, Marty, Does ASEAN Matter? A View from Within, Singapore: ISEAS, 2018.
National Institute for South China Sea Studies, A Legal Critique of the Award of the Arbitral Tribunal in the Matter of the South China Sea Arbitration (2020).
Nguyen Thi Lan Anh, “UNCLOS and Maritime Security in the South China Sea,” IPCS Issue Brief, no. 133. (2009): 171-.
Ovchar, Alexander, “Estoppel in the Jurisprudence of the ICJ, A Principle Promoting Stability Threats to Undermine it,” Bond Law Review 21. (2009).
Pair, Lara M, Judicial Activism in the ICJ Charter Interpretation, ILSA Journal of International & Comparative Law 8. (2001).
Panda, Ankit, “Is China Really About to Announce a South China Sea Air Defence Identification Zone? Maybe, but Maybe Not,” The Diplomat (1 June 2016).
Pauker, Guy J; Golay, F H, and Enloe, C H, Diversity and Development in Southeast Asia, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1977.
Paul, Sonial, “Timor Leste prods Australia on long-stalled gas project,” The Jakarta Post (8 September 2022): 5.
Paulus, Andreas, “International Adjudication,” in The Philosophy of International Law, edited by Samantha Besson and John Tasioulas, OUP, 2012.
Position Paper of the Government of the People’s Republic of China on the Matter of Jurisdiction in the South China Sea Arbitration initiated by the Republic of the Philippines (7 December 2014).
Pluvier, J M, Southeast Asia from Colonialism to Independence, OUP, 1974.
Posner, Eric A, “Is the International Court of Justice Biased?” John M Olin Law & Economics Working Paper, no.234, Chicago (2004).
――― and Yoo, John C, “Judicial Independence in International Tribunals,” California Law Review 93, no.1.(2005):3-.
Ramon, Adrianus Adityo Vito, “Completing the Jigsaw: The Recent Development of the Maritime Boundaries in the Timor Sea,” Indonesian Journal of International Law 15, no.4. (31 July 2018): 4-.
Raustiala, Kal, “Compliance & Effectiveness in International Regulatory Cooperation,” Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law 32. (2000):387-.
Raymond, Mark and Welch, David A, “What’s Really Going on in the South China Sea?” Journal of Current Southeast Asia Affairs 4, no.2. (2022):214-.
Reichner, Paul, “The South China Sea Arbitration and Beyond: China’s Approach to the Law of the Sea and the Rule of Law,” Japan Review 3, no. 2. Tokyo (Autumn 2019):4-.
Rossi, Christopher R, “Treaty of Tordesillas Syndrome: Sovereignty Ad Absurdum and the South China Sea Arbitration,” Cornell Int’l Law Journal 50. (2017): 231-. Schofield, Clive, “What’s at Stake in the South China Sea? Geographical and Geopolitical Considerations,” Faculty of Law, Humanities, and the Arts Papers 1229. University of Wollonggong, 2012.
Shany, Yuval, “No Longer a Weak Department of Power? Reflections on the Emergence of a New International Judiciary,” European Journal of International Law 20.(2009):1-.
Simmons, Beth A, “Capacity, Commitment, and Compliance, International Institutions and Territorial Disputes,” Journal of Conflict Resolution 46.(2002):829-.
Singapore Government Agency, Joint Press Statement on the 5th Malaysia-Singapore Joint Technical Committee Meeting on the Implementation of the ICJ Judgment on Pedra Branca, Middle Rocks and South Ledge, 29-30 November 2010 (2 December 2010).
Statement of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People’s Republic of China on the Award of 12 July 2016 of the Arbitral Tribunal in the South China Sea Arbitration established at the Request of the Republic of the Philippines (12 July 2016).
Storey, Ian and Lin Cheng-yi eds, The South China Sea Dispute, Navigating Diplomatic and Strategic Tensions, Singapore: Yusof Ishak Institute, 2016.
Strangio, Sebastian, “Chinese FM Pledges Progress on South China Sea Code of Conduct,” The Diplomat (13 July 2022).
―――, “After 12 Years, Indonesia and Vietnam Agree on EEZ Boundaries,” The Diplomat (23 December 2022).
Stuart Kaye, “The Timor Gap Treaty; Creative Solutions and International Conflict,” Sydney Law Review 16. (1994):732-.
Sulmasy, Glenn and Yoo, John, “Counterintuitive: Intelligence Operations and International Law,” Michigan Journal of International Law 28, no.3. (2007): 625-.
Talmon, Stefan, “The South China Sea Arbitration: Observations on the Award on Jurisdiction and Admissibility,” Chinese Journal of International Law (2016):309-.
Tamada, Dai, “The Timor Sea Conciliation: The Unique Mechanism of Dispute Settlement,” European Journal of International Law 33, no.1. (2020).
Tanaka, Yoshifumi, “Passing of Sovereignty, The Malaysia/Singapore Territorial Dispute before the ICJ,” Hague Justice Journal 3, no.2. (2008).
Thayer, Carlyle, “ASEAN, China and the Code of Conduct in the South China Sea,” SAIS Review of International Affairs 23, no.2. (Summer-Fall 2013);75-.
Treves, Tullio, “Fragmentation of International Law: The Judicial Perspective,” Agenda International XVI, no.27. (2009):213-.
Tseng, Katherine Hui-Yi, Rethinking South China Sea Disputes, the Untold Dimensions and Great Expectations, Oxford: Routledge, 2017.
Tseng, Peter, “The Peaceful Non-Settlement of Disputes: Article 4 of CMATS in Timor-Leste v Australia,” Melbourne Journal of International Law 18. (2017):349-.
United Nations, Division for Ocean Affairs and the Law of the Sea, Ocean & Law of the Sea, Declarations and statements, New York, updated 12 February 2022.
―――, “Security Council urges permanent ceasefire after recent Thai-Cambodia clashes,” UN News (14 February 2011).
United States Department of State, Bureau of Ocean and International Environmental and Scientific Affairs, “People’s Republic of China: Maritime Claim in the South China Sea,” Limits in the Sea, no.150, (January 2022).
United States Energy Information Administration, “The South China Sea is an important world energy trade route, Major Crude Oil Trade Flows in the South China Sea (2011),” Today in Energy (4 April 2013).
VnExpress (Hanoi, 10 June 2022).
Watts, Sir Arthur, “Enhancing the Effectiveness of Procedures of International Dispute Settlement,” Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law 5. (2012):1-39.
Wong, Audrey, “More than Peripheral: How Provinces Influence China’s Foreign Policy,” The China Quarterly (23 October 2017):20.
Yano, Toru, Japan’s Southeast Asia Policy, In Search of Mutual Trust, Tokyo: Simul International, 1978 (Japanese language).
Yeo, Mike, “Analysis: Can China Enforce a South China Sea Air-Defence Identification Zone?” Singapore: Yusof Ishak Institute (18 June 2016).
Yiallourides, Constantinos, Disputed Waters and Seabed Resources in Asia and Europe, Maritime Disputes and International Law, London and New York: Routledge, 2019.
Young, Ernest A, “Judicial Activism and Conservative Politics,” University of Colorado Law Review 73, no.4. (2002):1139-.
Zhang, Feng, “Chinese Thinking on the South China Sea and the Future of Regional Security” in US-China Competition and the South China Sea Disputes edited by Feng, Huiyun and He, Kai, 48-. London and New York: Routledge, 2018.
Ministry of Commerce, People’s Republic of China, Spokesman’s Remarks (16 November 2020). Accessed 31 March 2021, http://english.mofcom.gov.cn/article/newsrelease/policyreleasing/202011/20201103017259.shtml. International Court of Justice, List of All Cases, Accessed 31 March 2021, https://www.icj-cij.org/en/list-of-all-cases.
Davenport, Tara, “Compulsory Conciliation under UNCLOS: Prospects for Future Use, Centre for International Law,” University of Singapore. Accessed 6 October 2022, https://cil.nus.edu.sg/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Compulsory-Conciliation-under-UNCLOS-Prospects-for-Future-Use-Dr-Tara-Davenport.pdf.
Interview with a legal expert, 15 November 2016 (file with the author).
Interview with a governmental official, 15 May 2017(file with the author).
Interview with a governmental expert, 23 November 2018 (file with the author).
Interview with a governmental official, 15 January 2021 (file with the author).
Interview with a governmental official of a Southeast Asian country, 10 February 2021 (file with the author).
Interview with a governmental official, 20 February 2021 (file with the author).
Interview with a governmental official, 22 April 2022 (file with the author).
Charter of the United Nations. 1 UNTS 15 (entered into force 24 October 1945).
Statute of the International Court of Justice. 33 UNTS 993 (entered into force 24 October 1945).
Agreement Establishing Certain Seabed Boundaries in the Area of Timor and Arafura Seas. 974 UNTS 319 (signed 9 October 1972).
Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. 1155 UNTS 331 (entered into force 27 January 1980).
Treaty between Australia and the Republic of Indonesia on the Zone of Cooperation in an Area between the Indonesian Province of East Timor and Northern Australia. 29 ILM 475 (signed 11 December 1989, entered into force 9 February 1991).
Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes, in The Results of the Uruguay Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations, The Legal Texts (Geneva: GATT Secretariat, 1994), 404-.
United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). 1833 UNTS 397 (entered into force 14 November 1994).
Japan-Singapore Economic Partnership Agreement (entered into force 30 November 2002). Available at .
Timor Sea Treaty between the Government of East Timor and the Government of Australia. 2258 UNTS 3 (signed 20 May 2002, entered into force 2 April 2003).
Treaty between Australia and the Democratic Republic of Timor-Leste on Certain Maritime Arrangements in the Timor Sea. 2483 UNTS 359 (signed 12 January 2006, entered into force 27 June 2006).
Japan-Cambodia Investment Agreement. (signed 14 June 2007). Available at .
Charter of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations. 2624 UNTS 223 (entered into force 15 December 2008).
China, Note Verbales submitted in the proceedings of continental shelf extension in the UN Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf, UN Document CML/2/2009(9 February 2009), CML/17/2009 (New York, 7 May 2009), CML/18/2009 (New York, 7 May 2009), CML/8/2011 (New York, 14 April 2011).
Indonesia, Note Verbale No.480/POL-703/VII/10 (8 July 2010).
Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership. (RCEP, signed 15 November 2021). Available at .
Agreement between the Government of the Republic of Indonesia and the Government of the Commonwealth of Australia establishing Certain Seabed Boundaries. (signed 18 May 1971), Available at
China. The Exclusive Economic Zone and Continental Shelf Act (1998).
Island of Palmas, Netherlands/United States (1928), 2 RIAA 829.
Legal Status of Eastern Greenland, Denmark v Norway (1933), PCIJ Ser.A/B no. 53.
Colombian-Peruvian asylum, Judgment (1950), ICJ Reports, 1950
Minquieres et des Ecrehos, France /Royaume-Uni (1953), ICJ Report, 1953
Temple of Preah Vihear, Merits, between Cambodia and Thailand (1962), ICJ Reports, 1961
West Sahara, Advisory Opinion (1975), ICJ Reports, 1975
Gulf of Maine case, ICJ Reports, 1984
Burkina Faso/Mali Frontier Dispute judgment, (1986), ICJ Reports, 1986
Southern Bluefin Tuna cases (1999), ITLOS (1999)280, 23 RIAA 1
Maritime Delimitation and Territorial Question between Qatar and Bahrain (2001), ICJ Reports, 2001
Sovereignty over Pulay Ligitan and Pulay Sipadan, Indonesia v Malaysia, Merits (2002), ICJ Reports, 2002
Land Reclamation by Singapore in and around the Straits of Johor, Malaysia v Singapore, Decision (2005), Reports of International Arbitral Awards (RIAA) XXVII
Sovereignty over Pedra Branca/Pulau Batu Pujtech, Middle Rocks and South Ledge, Malaysia v Singapore, Judgment (2008), ICJ Reports, 2008
Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary between Bangladesh and Myanmar in the Bay of Bengal, Bangladesh/Myanmar (12 March 2012), ITLOS, Case no. 16
Request for Interpretation of the Judgment of 15 June 1962 in the Case concerning the Temple of Preah Vihear, Cambodia v Thailand, Judgment (2013), ICJ Reports, 2013
Whaling in the Antarctic case (2014), ICJ Reports, 2013; ICJ Reports, 2014.
Seizure and Detention of Certain Documents and Data, Timor-Leste v Australia, Provisional Measures, Order (2014), ICJ Reports, 2014
Railway Land, Malaysia/Singapore (2014), PCA, 2012-01
Arctic Sunrise Arbitration (2014), PCA, 2014-02
Chagos Marine Protected Area Arbitration (2015), PCA, 2011-03
South China Sea Arbitration, The Republic of the Philippines v The People’s Republic of China, Award (2016), Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA), 2016-1 Application for Revision of the Judgment of 23 May 2008 in the Case concerning Sovereignty over Pedra Branca/Pulau Batu Puteh, Middle Rocks and South Ledge (Malaysia v Singapore), ICJ, filed in the Registry of the Court (2 February 2017).
Timor Sea Conciliation, Timor-Leste v Australia (2018), PCA, 2016-10.
"Judicialization In and Around the South China Sea,"
Indonesian Journal of International Law: Vol. 21:
1, Article 1.
Available at: https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/ijil/vol21/iss1/1