•  
  •  
 

Jurnal Komunikasi Indonesia

Abstract

As a part of daily activities, the concept of reading is often used without referring to its conceptual meaning. The meaning of reading is simplified, to be only associated with the activity of scanning textual literatures. This simplified meaning does not only occur in the context of popular conversation, but can also be found in academic literature. By utilizing the literature review method, this conceptual article seeks to find a more relevant definition of reading that can explain the activity of reading in a communication perspective, especially related to the development of communication technology. Result of this study shows that the concept of reading in the field of communication is not limited to written script reading. In communication perspective, reading is more properly seen as an activity of scanning codes, symbols, and other forms of representation that contain patterns, including written scripts. Data and information can be seen as messages, while the five senses and technology as an extension of the sensory system,can be seen as sensors that receive the messages.

References

Aamodt, A., & Nygård, M. (1995). Different roles and mutual dependencies of data, information, and knowledge - An AI perspective on their integration. Data and Knowledge Engineering, 16, 191–222.

Ackoff, R. L. (1989). From Data to Wisdom. Journal of Applied System Analysis, 16, 3–9.

Baskarada, S. (2012, September). Towards a Semiotic Information Position Framework for Network Centric Warfare.Paper presented at the16th International Command and Control Research and Technology Symposia (ICCRTS), Québec City, Canada.

Baškarada, S., & Koronios, A. (2013). Data, information, knowledge, wisdom (DIKW): A semiotic theoretical and empirical exploration of the hierarchy and its quality dimension. Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 18(1), 5–24.

Beynon-Davies, P. (2007). Informatics and the Inca. International Journal of Information Management, 27, 306–318.

Beynon-Davies, P. (2009a). Neolithic informatics: The nature of information. International Journal of Information Management, 29, 3–14.

Beynon-Davies, P. (2009b). Significant threads: The nature of data. International Journal of Information Management, 29, 170–188.

Beynon-Davies, P. (2009c). The “language” of informatics: The nature of information systems. International Journal of Information Management, 29, 92–103.

Bleeker, E. (2010). On Reading in the Digital Age. Amsterdam: Stichting Lezen.

Bryman, A. (2016). Social Research Methods (5th ed.). Oxford: OXFORD University Press.

Chen, H., Chiang, R. H. L., & Storey, V. C. (2012). Business intelligence and analytics: From big data to big impact. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 36(4), 1165–1188.

Day, R. R., & Bamford, J. (1998). Extensive reading in the second language classroom. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.

Deely, J. (1990). Basics of Semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Fischer, S. R. (2004). A History of Reading.London:Reaktion Books Ltd.

Giffard, A. (2009). Des Lectures Industrielles. In: Bernard Stiegler, Alain Giffard, & Christian Faure,Pour en finir avec la mécroissance. Paris: Flammarion.

Jennex, M. E. (2017). Big data, the internet of things, and the revised knowledge pyramid. Data Base for Advances in Information Systems, 48(4), 69–79.

Jennings, F. G. (1965).This Is Reading. New York:Bureau of Publications Teachers College Columbia University.

Jesson, J., Matheson, L., Lacey, F. (2011). Doing your Literature Review: Traditional and Systematic Techniques.New York: SAGE Publications Ltd.

Kock, N. F., McQueen, R. J., & Corner, J. L. (1997). The nature of data, information and knowledge exchanges in business processes: Implications for process improvement and organizational learning. The Learning Organization, 4, 70–80.

Lasswell, H. (1948). The structure and function of communication in society. New York: Harper & Bros.

Mangen, A. (2008). Hypertext fiction reading: Haptics and immersion. Journal of Research in Reading, 31(4), 404–419.

McAfee, A., & Brynjolfsson, E. (2012). Big data: The management revolution. Harvard Business Review, 90(10), 60–68.

McLuhan, M. (1964). McLuhan Understanding Media:The Extensions of Man. New York: Signet Books.

Mugambi. (1996). Religion and Social Construction of Reality. Doctoral Dissertation. University of Nairobi, Kenya.

Patel, M. F., & Jain, P. M. (2008). English Language Teaching. Jaipur: Sunrise Publishers & Distributors.

Rowley, J. (2007). The wisdom hierarchy: Representations of the DIKW hierarchy. Journal of Information Science, 33, 163–180.

Ruben, B. D., & Stewart, L. P. (2006). Communication and Human Behavior (5th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education.

Shannon, C. E., & Weaver, W. (1949). The Mathematical Theory of Communication.Illinois: University of IllinoisPress.

Simanowski, R. (2015). Digital Art and Meaning. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Tuomi, I. (2000). Data Is More Than Knowledge: Implications of the Reversed Knowledge Hierarchy for Knowledge Management and Organizational Memory. Journal of Management Information Systems, 16(3), 103–117.

Wolf, M. (2007). Proust and the Squid: The Story and Science of the Reading Brain. Cambridge: Icon Books.

Download

Share

COinS