Social Media in the Anticorruption Movement: Social Network Analysis on the Refusal of the “Koruptor Boleh Nyaleg” Decision on Twitter

Authors

Chairun Nisa Zempi
Rahayu Rahayu

Abstract

This article aims to reveal the social network of an anticorruption movement via social media by showing the key actors, exchange of messages, and dynamics of the inter-temporal communication network. The anticorruption movement seems to be developing in line with increasing public awareness and the support of information and communications technology. By applying social network analysis on Twitter with the hashtag #koruptorkoknyaleg, study results indicated that a social network was formed in order to facilitate public voices pertaining to the issue of corruption. Actors possessing a track record in fighting against corruption in Indonesia became pioneers in establishing a social network. The research findings also indicated that the social network structure was dynamic. Although the social network seems to facilitate the spread of the anticorruption movement, it has limitations in altering political decisions relating to cases of corruption.

References

Alamsyah, W., Abid, L., & Sunaryanto, A. (2019, April 18). Laporan Tren Penindakan Kasus Korupsi Tahun 2018. Jakarta. Retrieved from https://antikorupsi.org/sites/default/files/laporan_tren_ penindakan_kasus_korupsi_2018.

Amelia. L., Purbolaksono. A., Syahayani. Z., (2017). Indonesia 2017. The Indonesian Institute : Jakarta.

Astuti. P. (2013). Politik Korupsi: Kendala Sistemik Pemberantasan Korupsi di Indonesia. Politika: Jurnal Ilmu Politik, 2(1), 5-17.

Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., & Grimes, J. M. (2010). Using ICTs to Create a Culture of Transparency : E-Government and Social Media as Openness and Anti-corruption Tools for Societies. Government Information Quarterly, 27(3), 264–271.

Bargh, J. A., McKenna, K. Y., & Fitzsimons, G. M. (2002). Can You See the Real Me? Activation and Expression of the “True Self” on the Internet. Journal of Social Issues, 58(1), 33-48.

Burford, A. (2012). Social Media and Political Participation: the Case of the Muslim Council of Britain. Retrieved from http://digitool.library.colostate.edu/exlibris/dtl/d3_1/apache_media/L2V4bGlicmlzL2R0bC9kM18xL2FwYWNoZV9tZWRpYS8xODY2OTE=.

Castells. M., (2007) Communication, Power and Counter-power in the Network Society. International Journal of Communication 1, 238-266 .

Castells. M. (2011). A Network Theory of Power. Internasional Journal Communication, 5, 773-778 .

Cuervo-Cazurra. A. (2006). Who Cares about Corruption?. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(6), 807-822.

Devito, J. (2011). Komunikasi Antarmanusia. Tangerang: Karisma Publishing Group.

Djamarah, B., Syaiful. (2004). Pola Komunikasi Orang Tua & Anak Dalam Keluarga. Jakarta: Reneka Cipta.

Eriyanto. (2014). Analisis Jaringan Komunikasi. Jakarta : Kencana.

Frolova I., Antonova I., Khamitova L., Zakirova L., C. L. (2017). Studies the Social Media on Corruption Issues through Content Analysis. Revista ESPACIOS, 38(49), 167–173.

Galuh. I., G. (2016). Media Sosial sebagai Strategi Gerakan Bali Tolak Reklamasi. Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 13(1), 73-92.

Gazali, E. (2014). Learning by Clicking: An Experiment with Social Media Democracy in Indonesia. International Communication Gazette, 76(4–5), 425–439.

Golbeck. J., (2013). Analyzing the social Web. Morgan Kaufmann : Waltham.

Hacker, K. L., & van Dijk, J. (Eds.). (2000). Digital Democracy: Issues of Theory and Practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Harris, T.E., & Nelson, M.D. (2008). Applied Organizational Communication. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Holt, K., Shehata, A., Strömbäck, J., & Ljungberg, E. (2013). Age and the Effects of News Media Attention and Social Media use on Political Interest and Participation: Do Social Media Function as Leveller?. European Journal of Communication, 28(1), 19–34.

Jha, C. K., & Sarangi, S. (2014). Social Media, Internet, and Corruption. Economics Working Paper Series, Louisiana State University.

ICW (2019, April 8). Evaluasi DPR 2014-2019. Periode Minim Prestasi, Penuh Kontroversi. Retrieved from https://antikorupsi.org/sites/default/files/siaran_pers_icw_-_evaluasi_dpr_2014-2019_0.

Kang, R., Brown, S., & Kiesler, S. (2013, April). Why do People Seek Anonymity on the Internet?: Informing Policy and Design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 2657-2666). ACM.

Lim, M. (2013). Many Clicks but Little Sticks: Social Media Activism in Indonesia. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 43(4), 636–657.

Loader, B. D. (2008). Social Movements and New Media. Sociology Compass, 2(6), 1920–1933.

McLuhan, M. (1994). Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.

Meyer. D.S., & Tarrow. S., (1998). The Social Movement Society: Contentious Politics for a New Century. United State : Rowman & littlefield publishers.

Myers, D. J. (1994). Communication Technology and Social Movements: Contributions of Computer Networks to Activism. Social Science Computer Review, 12(2), 250–260.

Natachia, D.A. (2017). Buzzer dan Jaringannya Analisis Jaringan Hyperlink akun Twitter @panca66 dalam Pilkada 2015 di Tangerang Selatan. Unpublished Master Thesis, Gadjah Mada University.

Reda. K., Tantipathananandh. C., Johnson. A., Leigh J., & Berger-Wolf. T. (2011). Visualizing the Evolution of Community Structures in Dynamic Social Networks. Eurographics / IEEE Symposium on Visualization 2011 (EuroVis 2011). 30 (3).

Setiyono, B. & McLeod, R.H. (2010) Civil Society Organisations' Contribution to the Anti-Corruption Movement in Indonesia. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 46:3, 347-370.

Setyawan. F.A. (2018, Mei 24). KPK Dukung KPU Larang Eks Koruptor Jadi Caleg. CNN Indonesia. Retrieved from https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20180524072634-32-300842/kpk-dukung-kpu-larang-eks-koruptor-jadi-caleg.

Simarmata. M.H. (2017). Peranan e-Government dan Media Sosial untuk Mewujudkan Budaya Transparansi dan Pemberantasan Korupsi. Jurnal.KPK: Integritas, 3 (2).

Starke, C., & Naab, T. K. (2016). Free to Expose Corruption : The Impact of Media Freedom, Internet Access , and Governmental Online Service Delivery on Corruption. International Journal of Communication, 10, 4702–4722.

Stein. L., (2009). Social Movement Web Use in Theory and Practice: A Content Analysis of US Movement Websites. New media & Society, 11(5), 749–771.

Sulistyo, P. B., & Azmawati, A. A. (2016). The Roles of Facebook in Creating New Anti Corruption Social Movement Through Online Community In Indonesia. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 6(7), 33-37.

Talpau, A. (2014). Social Media - A New Way Of Communication. Eucalyptus Plantations: Research , Management And Development, 7(2), 211–219.

Van Dijk, J. (2006). The Network Society: Social Aspects of New Media. London: Sage Publications.

Wasserman. S., & Faust. K., (1999). Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. United Kingdom : Cambridge University Press.

Weller. K., Bruns. A., Burgess. J., Mahrt. M., & Puschmann. C., (2014). Twitter and Society. New York : Peter Lang Publishing.

Recommended Citation

Zempi, Chairun Nisa and Rahayu, Rahayu (2019) "Social Media in the Anticorruption Movement: Social Network Analysis on the Refusal of the “Koruptor Boleh Nyaleg” Decision on Twitter," Jurnal Komunikasi Indonesia: Vol. 8: No. 2, Article 1.
DOI: 10.7454/jki.v8i2.11195
Available at: https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/jkmi/vol8/iss2/1