•  
  •  
 

Jurnal Komunikasi Indonesia

Abstract

Abstract: This study explains young people's experience in Indonesia with their privacy management regarding sexting in dating relationships. The research uses Communication Privacy Management (CPM) Theory. This study uses qualitative research, collecting data by doing in-depth interviews with 10 informants of young adults who have sexting with their partners. Thematic analysis of the data finds that how informants perceive sexting, the function of sexting in their relationship, and the risk of sexting influence the way they carry out privacy management. The informants think it strengthens the connection and trust with their partners. However, they are fully aware of the risk of sexting: the text could easily leak to others, which could be harmful to their reputation. There are influences from gender and cultural context on what is called privacy and its risks. Therefore, they implement very complex privacy management, such as choosing the safest chat application; making rules about how the pictures or videos must not show a background that can be used to identify the sender of sexting; and keeping the passwords of all social media accounts owned by their partners. They also have their own 'language,' by using emoticons and codes, which are only understood by them and their partners. Hence, those who engage in sexting protect their privacy by establishing complex privacy boundaries that they mutually agree on.

References

Ahern, N. R., & Mechling, B. (2013). Sexting: Serious Problems for Youth. Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services, 51(7), 22–30. https://doi.org/10.3928/02793695-20130503-02

Anastassiou, A. (2017). Sexting and Young People: A Review of the Qualitative Literature. The Qualitative Report, 22(8), 2231-2239. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2017.2951

Bagley, L. A., & Kimberly, C. (2017). Technology Use and its Association with Romantic Relationships. In C. L. Scott & S. L. Blair (Eds.), Contemporary Perspectives in Family Research (Vol. 11, pp. 217–236). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1530-353520170000011010

Baxter, L., & Braithwaite, D. (2008). Engaging Theories in Interpersonal Communication: Multiple Perspectives. SAGE Publications, Inc.

https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483329529

Bennet, L. R., Hidayana, I. M. & Davies, S. G. (2018). Seksualitas di Indonesia: Politik Seksual, Kesehatan, Keragaman, dan Representasi. Jakarta: Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.

Bragard, E., & Fisher, C. B. (2022). Associations between sexting motivations and consequences among adolescent girls. Journal of Adolescence, 94(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/jad.12000

Burkett, M. (2015). Sex(t) Talk: A Qualitative Analysis of Young Adults’ Negotiations of the Pleasures and Perils of Sexting. Sexuality & Culture, 19(4), 835–863. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-015-9295-0

Chalfen, R. (2010). Commentary Sexting as Adolescent Social Communication: A call for attention. Journal of Children and Media, 4(3), 350–354.

https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2010.486144

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (Third edition). SAGE.

Drouin, M., & Landgraff, C. (2012). Texting, sexting, and attachment in college students’ romantic relationships. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(2), 444–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.10.015

Galovan, A. M., Drouin, M., & McDaniel, B. T. (2018). Sexting profiles in the United States and Canada: Implications for individual and relationship well-being. Computers in Human Behavior, 79, 19–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.10.017

Gordon-Messer, D., Bauermeister, J. A., Grodzinski, A., & Zimmerman, M. (2013). Sexting Among Young Adults. Journal of Adolescent Health, 52(3), 301–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.05.013

Griffin, E. A., Ledbetter, A., & Sparks, G. G. (2015). A first look at communication theory (Ninth Edition). New York: McGraw-Hill Education.

Hasinoff, A. A. (2016). How to have great sext: Consent advice in online sexting tips. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 13(1), 58–74.

https://doi.org/10.1080/14791420.2015.1077980

Hernandez, R. (2018). Understanding Sorority Women’s Privacy Management About Condom Use. Qualitative Health Research, 28(8), 1342–1353.

https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732318766506

Herrman, A. R., & Tenzek, K. E. (2017). Communication Privacy Management: A Thematic Analysis of Revealing and Concealing Eating Disorders in an Online Community. Qualitative Research Reports in Communication, 18(1), 54–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/17459435.2017.1294617

Kahlow, J. (2020). The influence of technology on privacy boundary management in young adults’ sexting relationships: A communication privacy management perspective.. In: R. Kalish, ed. Young adult sexuality in the digital age. Washington DC: APA PsycNet, pp. 73-93.

Koehler, K. (2020). “It’s None of Your Damn Business”: Communication Among Newlyweds Regarding Family Expansion Preferences, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA: South Dakota State University ProQuest Dissertations Publishing 28001495.

Krieger, M. A. (2017). Unpacking “Sexting”: A Systematic Review of Nonconsensual Sexting in Legal, Educational, and Psychological Literatures. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 18(5), 593–601. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838016659486

Lenhart, A. (2009). Teens and Sexting. Washington DC: Pew Research Center.

Lippman, J. R., & Campbell, S. W. (2014). Damned If You Do, Damned If You Don’t…If You’re a Girl: Relational and Normative Contexts of Adolescent Sexting in the United States. Journal of Children and Media, 8(4), 371–386.

https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2014.923009

Livingstone, S., & Görzig, A. (2014). When adolescents receive sexual messages on the internet: Explaining experiences of risk and harm. Computers in Human Behavior, 33, 8–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.12.021

Lounsbury, K., Mitchell, K. J. & Finkelhor, D. (2011). The True Prevalence of "Sexting", New Hampshire: Crimes Against Children Research Center University of New Hampshire.

McDaniel, B. T., & Drouin, M. (2015). Sexting Among Married Couples: Who Is Doing It, and Are They More Satisfied? Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 18(11), 628–634. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2015.0334

Mori, C., Cooke, J. E., Temple, J. R., Ly, A., Lu, Y., Anderson, N., Rash, C., & Madigan, S. (2020). The Prevalence of Sexting Behaviors Among Emerging Adults: A Meta-Analysis. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 49(4), 1103–1119.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-020-01656-4

Parker, T. S., Blackburn, K. M., Perry, M. S., & Hawks, J. M. (2013). Sexting as an Intervention: Relationship Satisfaction and Motivation Considerations. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 41(1), 1–12.

https://doi.org/10.1080/01926187.2011.635134

Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (Fourth edition). SAGE Publications, Inc.

Petronio, S. (2002). Boundaries of Privacy. Albany, New York: State University of New York Press.

Petronio, S. (2004). Road to Developing Communication Privacy Management Theory: Narrative in Progress, Please Stand By. Journal of Family Communication, 4(3), 193–207. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327698jfc0403&4_6.

Petronio, S. (2013). Brief Status Report on Communication Privacy Management Theory. Journal of Family Communication, 13(1), 6–14.

https://doi.org/10.1080/15267431.2013.743426

Petronio, S., & Child, J. T. (2020). Conceptualization and operationalization: Utility of communication privacy management theory. Current Opinion in Psychology, 31, 76–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.08.009

Ringrose, J., Harvey, L., Gill, R., & Livingstone, S. (2013). Teen girls, sexual double standards and ‘sexting’: Gendered value in digital image exchange. Feminist Theory, 14(3), 305–323. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700113499853

Santrock, J. W. (2011). Life-span development (13th ed). McGraw-Hill Higher Education.

Silva, R. B. R., Teixeira, C. M., Vasconcelos-Raposo, J., & Bessa, M. (2016). Sexting: Adaptation of sexual behavior to modern technologies. Computers in Human Behavior, 64, 747–753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.07.036

Suler, J. (2004). The Online Disinhibition Effect. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 7(3), 321–326. https://doi.org/10.1089/1094931041291295

Walker, S., Sanci, L., & Temple-Smith, M. (2013). Sexting: Young Women’s and Men’s Views on Its Nature and Origins. Journal of Adolescent Health, 52(6), 697–701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.01.026

Walrave, M., Ponnet, K., Van Ouytsel, J., Van Gool, E., Heirman, W., & Verbeek, A. (2015). Whether or not to engage in sexting: Explaining adolescent sexting behaviour by applying the prototype willingness model. Telematics and Informatics, 32(4), 796–808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2015.03.008

West, R. L., & Turner, L. H. (2018). Introducing communication theory: Analysis and application (Sixth edition). McGraw-Hill Education.

Wolak, J., & Finkelhor, D. (2011). Sexting: A typology.

Wolak, J. & Finkelhor, D. (2011). Sexting: A typology. Durham, New Hampshire: Crimes against Children Research Center.

Ybarra, M. L., & Mitchell, K. J. (2014). “Sexting” and Its Relation to Sexual Activity and Sexual Risk Behavior in a National Survey of Adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health, 55(6), 757–764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.07.012

Download

Share

COinS