•  
  •  
 

Abstract

In the communication of pain, language matters. Telling someone to feel pain is not just a description of one’s pain, it is – as philosopher Ludwig Wittgenstein informs us – also asking for recognition of that pain. This requires a shared language which communicates it. Do we need a new language which can communicate and recognize the pain of the colonial past more effectively? Commencing with the recent apology for waging “a colonial war” in Indonesia by the Dutch prime minister, this article suggests an intervention in post-colonial recognition politics by exploring the idea of the multi-voicedness. Multi-voicedness (Meerstemmigheid) has become a catchword in current public and scholarly debates about the Dutch colonial past and its legacy, in which decades of recognition politics have tended to privilege clear-cut binary identities favouring certain voices above others. There is little conceptual clarity around what the term multi-voicedness entails and even less about its utility in post-colonial discourse. Although commonly associated with juxtaposing different perspectives, this article argues that introducing the lens of multi-voicedness – more specifically the idea of the dialogical self (Hubert J.M. Hermans 2004) – into the recognition discourse, contributes to a better understanding of transnational recognition politics. Capturing the diaspora’s multi-voicedness permits wider scrutiny of what is otherwise a too simplified identity and generation question implicated in post-colonial recognition politics. It will be argued that recognition claims, although supposedly part of an emancipatory struggle, are silencing the multi-voicedness of entangled Indonesian-Dutch family history, the driver for the fight for justice in the first place.

References

Ahmed, Sara. 2017. Living a feminist life. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Ahmed, Sara. 2021. Complaint! Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Appiah, Kwame Anthony. 2018. The lies that bind; Rethinking identity. HighBridge Audio.

Birney, Alfred. 2020. The interpreter from Java. Tallinn: Apollo. [First edition 2016.]

Arendt, Hannah. 1958. The human condition. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Aveling, Emma-Louise, Alex Gillespie, and Flora Cornish. 2015. “A qualitative method for analysing multivoicedness”, Qualitative Research 15(6): 670-687.

Bossenbroek, Martin. 2001. De meelstreep; Terugkeer en opvang na de Tweede Wereldoorlog. Arnheim: Bert Bakker.

Bouwmeester, Thomas. 2018. “Feelings as traces of colonialism; The online debate about compensation for the Indo-European community in the Netherlands analyzed through the sociology of emotions”. MPhil thesis, University of Humanistic Studies, Utrecht.

Bussemaker, Herman Th. 2014. Indisch verdriet; Strijd om erkenning. Amsterdam: Boom.

Cribb, Robert. 1991. Gangsters and revolutionaries; The Jakarta people’s militia and the Indonesian revolution 1945-1949. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press.

Captain, Esther. 2014. “Harmless Identities; Representation of racial consciousness among three generations Indo-Europeans”, in: Philomena Essed and Isabel Hoving, Dutch racism, pp. 53-70. Leiden: Brill. [Thamyris/Intersecting: Place, Sex and Race Vol. 27.]

Coulthard, Glen. S. 2007. ‘’Subjects of the empire”, Contemporary Political Theory 6: 437-460.

Das, Veena. 2006. “Language and body; Transactions in the construction of pain” (Chapter 3), in: Verena Das, Life and Words; Violence and the descent into the ordinary, pp. xx. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Doornbos, Julia and Ana Dragojlovo. 2022. “’The past should not affect the children’; Intergenerational hauntings in the homes of Indo-Europeans families”, Gender, Place and Culture 29(8): 1141-1161.

Freriks, Kester. 2018. Tempo Doeloe; Een omhelzing. Amsterdam: Athenaeum.

Hermans, Hubert, and Agnieszka Hermans-Konopka. 2010. Dialogical self theory; Positioning and counter-positioning in a globalizing society. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Hermans, Hubert J.M. 2004. “Introduction; The dialogical self in a global and digital age”, Identity; An International Journal of Theory and Research 4(4): 297-320. [Https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532706xid0404_1.]

Honneth, Axel. 1996. Struggle for recognition; The moral grammar of social conflicts. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Immler, Nicole. 2012. “‘Too little, too late’? Compensation and family memory; Negotiating Austria’s holocaust past”, Memory Studies 5(3): 270-281. [Https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1750698012443468.]

Immler, Nicole. 2017. Thematische collectie; Narrated (in)justice. [DANS, https://doi.org/10.17026/dans-ze8-yg84.]

Immler, Nicole. 2018. “Hoe koloniaal onrecht te erkennen? De Rawagede-zaak laat de kansen en grenzen van rechtsherstel zien” (How can colonial injustice be acknowledged? The Rawagede case shows the possibilities and limits of reparation), BMGN – Low Countries Historical Review 133(4): 57-87. [Https://doi.org/10.18352/bmgn-lchr.10613.]

Immler, Nicole and Stef Scagliola. 2020. “Seeking justice for the mass execution in Rawagede. Probing the concept ‘entangled history’ in a postcolonial setting”, Rethinking History; The Journal of Theory and Practice 24(1): 1-28. [Https://doi.org/10.1080/13642529.2019.1693134.]

Immler, Nicole. 2020. “Het slavernijverleden als erfenis”, Wijsgerig Perspectief, (Themanummer: Generaties) 1: 24-33. [Https://www.filosofie.nl/het-slavernijverleden-als-erfenis/.]

Immler, Nicole. 2021. “What is meant by ‘repair’ when claiming reparations for colonial wrongs? Transformative Justice for the Dutch Slavery Past”, Slaveries & Post-Slaveries 5. [Https:// doi.org/10.4000/slaveries.5089.]

Koinova, Maria and Dzeneta Karabegovic. 2016. “Diasporas and transitional justice; Transnational activism from local to global levels of engagement”, Global Networks. [Https://doi.org/10.1111/glob.12128.]

Legêne, Susan. 2014. “Mallaby’s car; Colonial subjects, imperial actors, and the representation of human suffering in postcolonial exhibitions”, Open Arts Journal 3: 97-111. [Http://dx.doi.org/10.5456/issn.2050-3679/2014s16sl.]

Legêne, Susan. 2017. “The European character of the intellectual history of Dutch Empire”, BMGN – Low Countries Historical Review 132(2): 110–120. [DOI:10.18352/bmgn-lchr.10344.]

Limpach, Rémy. 2017. De brandende kampongs van General Spoor. Amsterdam: Boom.

Meijer, Hans. 2005. Indische rekening; Indië, Nederland en de backpay-kwestie. Amsterdam: Boom.

Molendijk, Tine. 2018. “Moral injury en erkenning; Eenduidige verhalen over oorlog tegenover tegenstrijdige uitzendervaringen”, in: Daniël Muller and Erwin Kamp (eds), Moral injury; Verborgen littekens van het innerlijke strijdveld, pp. 89-101. Delft: Eburon.

Oostindie, Gert. 2015. “Soldaat in Indonesië, 1945–1950; Getuigenissen van een oorlog aan de verkeerde kant van de geschiedenis” (Soldiers in Indonesia, 1945-1950; Witnesses to a war on the wrong side of history). Amsterdam: Prometheus/Bert Bakker.

Raben, Remco. 2017. “Wie spreekt voor het koloniale verleden? Een pleidooi voor transkolonialisme” (Who speaks for the colonial past? A plea for transcolonialism). [Oration, University of Amsterdam, 28 September 2016.]

Rothberg, Michael. 2019. The implicated subject; Beyond victims and perpetrators. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.

Schaafsma, Juliette, Marieke Zoodsma, and Thia Sagherian-Dickey. 2021. “Closing chapters of the past? Rhetorical strategies in political apologies for human rights violations across the world”, Journal of Human Rights 20(5): 582-597. [DOI: 10.1080/14754835.2021.1977919.]

Scagliola, Stef. 2012. “Cleo’s “unfinished business”; Coming to terms with Dutch war crimes in Indonesia’s war of Independence”. Journal of Genocide Research 3(4): 419-439. [DOI:10.1080/14623528.2012.719374.]

Scagliola, Stef. 2002. Last van de oorlog; De Nederlandse oorlogsmisdaden in Indonesië en hun verwerking. (Burden of war; Dutch war crimes in Indonesia and their processing). Amsterdam: Balans.

Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. 1988. “Can the subaltern speak?”, in: Cary Nelson and Lawrence Grossberg (eds), Marxism and the interpretation of culture, pp. 271-316. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.

Steijlen, Fridus. 2010. “Het Gebaar”, in: M. de Keijzer and M. Plomp, Het blijft gevoelig; Hoe wij ons de Tweede Wereldoorlog herinneren, pp. 190-199. Amsterdam: Prometheus.

Swirc, Maurice. 2022. De Indische doofpot; Waarom Nederlandse oorlogsmisdaden in Indonesië nooit zijn vervolgd. Amsterdam: Arbeiderspers.

Taylor, Charles. 1994. “The politics of recognition”, in: Amy Gutman (ed.), Multiculturalism; Examining the politics of recognition, pp. 25-73. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Torpey, John. 2006. “Modes of repair; Reparations and citizenship at the dawn of the new millennium”, in: D.E. Davis, Political power and social theory 18, pp. 207-226. Bingley: Emerald Books.

Wekker, Gloria. 2016. White innocence; Paradoxes of colonialism and race. Durham and London: Duke University Press.

Wiebelhaus-Brahm, Eric. 2016. “Exploring variation in diasporas’ engagement with transitional justice processes”, Journal of Peacebuilding & Development 11(3): 23-36.

Withuis, Jolande. 2002. Erkenning; Van oorlogstrauma naar klaagcultuur. Amsterdam: De Bezige Bij.

Zalc, Claire and Tal Bruttmann. 2016. Microhistories of Holocaust. Oxford/New York, NY: Berghahn books. [War and Genocide Series Vol. 24.]

Download

Share

COinS