•  
  •  
 

Abstract

Multicultural society as a way of being-with-others needs a certain form of public reasoning. Unfortunately, the current yet dominant form of public reasoning is infiltrated by biases from occidental culture. This mode of reasoning does nothing but uproot participants from their cultural identity for the sake of universal consensus. Multicultural society, however, consists of identities which are embedded in the individuals' cultural tradition. This sociological fact demands a richer form of rationality that does not deny the multiplicity of cultural values and embedded identities. We need a form of public reasoning which emphasizes cultural understanding rather than abstract consensus. We might call it a multicultural, contextualized and other-regarding form of public reason.

References

Bennet, David. 1998. “Introduction”, in: David Bennet (ed.), Multicultural states; Rethinking differences and identity, p. 2. London: Routledge.

Berlin, Isaiah. 1969. Four essays on liberty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Crowder, George. 2002. Liberalism and value pluralism. London: Continuum.

Delanty, Gerard. 1997. “Habermas and occidental rationalism; The politics of identity, social learning, and the cultural limits of moral universalism“, Sociology Theory 15(1): 30-59.

Habermas, Jurgen. 1984. The theory of communicative action Vol. 1. Translated by Thomas McCarthy. Boston: Beacon Press.

Habermas, Jurgen. 1999. Moral consciousness and communicative action. Translated by Christian Lenhardt. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Korsgaard, Christine M. 2002. The sources of normativity. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Levine, George et al. 1989. “Speaking for the Humanities“, American Council of Learned Societies Occasional Paper No. 7 (45 pp.).

Mulhern, Francis. 2000. Culture/Metaculture. London: Routledge.

Nussbaum, Martha. 2000. Women and human development; The capabilities approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Parekh, Bhikhu. 2000. Rethinking multiculturalism; Cultural diversity and political theory. London: Macmillan Press.

Rawls, John. 2001. Justice as fairness; A restatement. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Searle, John, 1993. “Rationality and realism; What is at stake?“, Daedalus Vol. 122 (4): 55-83.

Taylor, Charles. 1995. Philosophical arguments. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Download

Share

COinS