•  
  •  
 

Abstract

This paper aims to show the dynamics of the Indonesian - Malaysian border area in Sebatik Island, East Kalimantan, Indonesia. Take into account as a background is the territorial dispute between Indonesia and Malaysia over the Ligitan and Sipadan Islands which were awarded to Malaysia by the decision of the ICJ (International Court of Justice) in 2002, which was followed by the dispute over the Ambalat sea block in 2005. Sebatik Island is geographically very strategic since it faces the disputed areas. Therefore the concerns of the Indonesian state with regard to the island pertain to issues of nation-state sovereignty and territorial security, which she tries to safeguard through intensive campaigns. Research conducted in Sebatik in 2009 showed how people willingly reinforced the state by incorporating its programs, despite their ambiguous position as people in a border area, which support they used subsequently in negotiating with the state for their own local purpose.

References

Amster, Matthew H. 2005. “The rhetoric of the state; Dependency and control in a Malaysian-Indonesian borderland key words”, Identities; Global Studies in Power and Culture 12/1 (January-March): 23–43.

Arsana, I Made Andi. 2005. “Ambalat; A spatial perspective”, (Http://geoboundaries.blogspot.com/2005/04/ambalat-spatial-perspective1.html, The university of New South Wales), accessed 20 February 2010.

Cribb, Robert. 2010. Digital atlas of Indonesian history. Nias (Nordic Institute of Asian Studies) Press.

Direktorat Jenderal (Ditjen) Penataan Ruang. 2003. Kebijakan dan strategi spasial pengembangan kawasan perbatasan Kalimantan-Serawak-Sabah. Jakarta: Departemen Pemukiman dan Prasarana Wilayah.

Das, Veena and Deborah Poole. 2004. “State and its margins; Comparative ethnographies”, in: Veena Das and Deborah Poole (eds), Anthropology in the margins of the State, pp. 2-32. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press.

Donnan, H. and D. Haller. 2000. “Liminal no more; The relevance of borderland studies”, Ethnologia Europaea 30(2): 7–22.

Donnan, Hastings and Thomas M. Wilson. 2003. “Territoriality, anthropology and interstitial; Subversion and support in European borderlands”, Focaal; European Journal of Anthropology 41: 9-20.

Eilenberg, Michael and Reed L. Wadley. 2009. “Borderland livelihood strategies; The socio-economic significance of ethnicity in cross-border labour migration, West Kalimantan, Indonesia”, Asia Pacific Viewpoint Vol. 50 No.1 (April): 58-73.

Horstmann, A. and R.L. Wadley. 2006. “Centering the margin in Southeast Asia”, in: A. Horstmann and R.L. Wadley (eds), Centering the margin; Agency and narrative in Southeast Asian borderlands, pp. 1–24. New York: Berghahn Books.

Martinez, Oscar J. 1994. Border people; Life and society in the U.S.-Mexico borderlands. Tucson: The University of Arizona Press.

Paasi, Anssi. 1999. “Boundaries as social practice and discourse; The FinnishRussian border”, Regional Studies 33/ 7: 669—680.

Patmasari, Tri , et al. 2008. “The Indonesian archipelagic baselines; Technical and legal issues and the changing of environment, Bakosurtanal”, (http:// www.gmat.unsw.edu.au/ablos/ABLOS08Folder/Session6-Paper2- Patmasari.pdf), accessed 20 January 2010.

Potter, Lesley. 2009. “Resource periphery, corridor, heartland: Contesting land use in the Kalimantan / Malaysia borderlands”, Asia Pacific Viewpoint Vol. 50 No. 1 (April): 88-106.

Sahlins, Peter. 1989. Boundaries; The making of France and Spain in the Pyrenees. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Schendel, W. van and I. Abraham (eds). 2005. Illicit flows and criminal things; States, borders, and the other side of globalization, tracking globalization. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Press.

Tirtosudarmo, Riwanto. 2007. Mencari Indonesia; Demografi politik pasca Soeharto. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia.

Download

Share

COinS