•  
  •  
 

Abstract

This experimental phonetic research deals with the prosodies of directive speech in Javanese. The research procedures were: (1) speech production, (2) acoustic analysis, and (3) perception test. The data investigated are three directive utterances, in the form of statements, commands, and questions. The data were obtained by recording dialogues that present polite as well as impolite speech. Three acoustic experiments were conducted for statements, commands, and questions in directive speech: (1) modifications of duration, (2) modifications of contour, and (3) modifications of fundamental frequency. The result of the subsequent perception tests to 90 stimuli with 24 subjects were analysed statistically with ANOVA (Analysis of Variant). Based on this statistic analysis, the prosodic characteristics of polite and impolite speech were identified.

References

Austin, J.L. 1984. How to do things with words. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.

Brown, P. and S.C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness; Some universals in language usage. Revised version. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [First edition 1978.]

Cruttenden, Alan. 1997. Intonation. Second Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [First edition 1986.]

Errington, J. Joseph. 1985. Language and social change in Java; Linguistic reflexes of modernization in a traditional royal polity. Ohio: Ohio University.

Errington, J. Joseph. 1988. Structure and style in Javanese; A semiotic view of linguistic etiquette. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

Grice, H.P. 1991. “Logic and Conversation”, in: Steven Davis (ed.), Pragmatics; A reader, pp. 305-315. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Gunarwan, Asim. 2007. Pragmatik; Teori dan kajian Nusantara. Jakarta: Penerbit Universitas Atma Jaya.

‘t Hart, J., R. Collier, and A. Cohen. 1990. A perceptual study of intonation; An experimental-phonetic approach to speech melody. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Heuven, Vincent J. van. 1994. “Introducing prosodic phonetics”, in: Cecilia Odé and Vincent J. van Heuven (eds), Experimental studies of Indonesian prosody, pp. 1-26. Leiden: Vakgroep Talen en Culturen van Zuidoost-Azië en Oceanië, Rijkuniversiteit te Leiden.

Heuven, Vincent J. van, and Ellen van Zanten. 2007. Prosody in Indonesian languages. Utrecht: Landelijke Onderzoekschool Taalwetenschap (LOT).

Leech, G.N. 1983. Principles of pragmatics. London: Longman.

Nooteboom, Sieb. 1999. “The prosody of speech; Melody and rhythm”, in: William J. Hardcastle and John Laver (eds), The handbook of phonetics sciences, pp. 640-673. Oxford: Blackwell.

Poedjosoedarmo, Soepomo, 1979. Tingkat tutur bahasa Jawa. Jakarta: Pusat Pembinaan dan Pengembangan Bahasa, Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Rahyono, F.X. 2002 “Representamen kebudayaan Jawa; Teknik komparatif referensial pada teks Wedhatama”, Wacana, Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Budaya 4/1 (April): 14-33.

Rahyono, F.X. 2003. “Intonasi ragam bahasa Jawa Keraton Yogyakarta; Kontras deklarativitas, interogativitas, dan imperativitas”. Disertasi, Universitas Indonesia, Depok.

Rahyono, F.X. 2005. “Kearifan dalam bahasa; Sebuah tinjauan pragmatis terhadap profil kebahasaan media massa pada Masa Pascaorde Baru”, Jurnal Makara; Seri Sosial Humaniora 9/2 (Desember): 46-56.

Searle, John R. 1991. “Indirect speech acts”, in: Steven Davis (ed.), Pragmatics; A reader pp. 265-277. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Thomas, Jenny. 1996. Meaning in interaction; An introduction to pragmatics. London: Longman.

Yule, G. 1996. Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Download

Share

COinS