•  
  •  
 

Abstract

Walaupun hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa manfaat koreksi kesalahan pada tulisan siswa bertentangan satu dengan yang lain, pengajar bahasa tidak dapat berhenti mengoreksi kesalahan-keslahan karena siswa sendiri menginginkan pengajar mengoreksi kesalahan-kesalahan mereka (Walz 1982). Masalahnya adalah harapan siswa kerap kali berbeda dengan keyakinan pengajar tentang koreksi kesalahan (Diab 2006). Kajian ini ingin mengetahui keinginan para mahasiswa dan pengajar di Universitas di Indonesia tentang koreksi kesalahan tulisan mahasiswa. Sebuah kuesioner yang disusun berdasarkan kuesioner yang digunakan Leki (1991) dan kuesioner yang digunakan Diab (2006) digunakan untuk mengetahui keinginan pengajar dan mahasiswa tentang teknik koreksi dan keyakinan mereka tentang koreksi kesalahan tulisan yang effektif. Kuesioner ini dibagikan kepada mahasiswa dan pengajar di Indonesia. Jawaban pengajar dibandingkan dengan jawaban mahasiswa. Bila pengajar dan mahasiswa memahami tujuan dari teknik koreksi kesalahan tertentu dan setuju dengan penggunaannya, koreksi kesalahan diyakini akan sangat bermanfaat. Berdasarkan hasil kajian ini, beberapa implikasi bagi pengajaran bahasa di kelas dibahas.

References

Bartram, M. and Walton, R. 1991. Correction: a positive approach to language mistakes. London: Language Teaching Publications.

Brumfit, Christopher J. 1980. Problems and principles in English teaching. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

Corder, S. Pit. 1967. “The significance of learner’s Errors”, International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching Vol. 4: 161-170.

Corder, S. Pit. 1981. Error analysis and interlanguage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Diab, R. L. 2006. “Error correction and feedback in the EFL writing classroom: Comparing instructor and student preferences”, English Teaching Forum Vol. 44/1: 2-13, 38.

Ferris, Dana R. 1995. “Student reactions to teacher response in multi-draft composition classrooms”, TESOL Quarterly Vol. 29/1: 33-53.

Ferris, Dana R. 1997. “The influence of teacher commentary on student revision”, TESOL Quarterly Vol. 31/2: 315-339.

Ferris, Dana R. 1999. “The case for grammar correction in L2 writing classes: a response to Truscott (1996)”, Journal of Second Language Writing Vol. 8/1: 1-11.

Ferris, Dana R. 2004. “The ‘grammar correction’ debate in L2 writing: where are we, and where do we go from here? (and what do we do in the meantime …?)”, Journal of Second Language Writing Vol. 13/1: 49-62.

Hendrickson, James M. 1981. Error analysis and error correction in language teaching. Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Language Centre. (Occasional Paper nr. 10).

Horwitz, E.K. 1988. “The beliefs about language learning of beginning University Foreign Language students”, Modern Language Journal Vol. 72/3: 283-294.

Kern, R.G. 1995. “Students’ and teachers’ beliefs about language learning”, Foreign Language Annals Vol. 28/1: 71-92.

Lee, Icy. 1997. “ESL learners’ performance in error correction in writing: some implications for teaching”, System Vol. 25/4: 465-477.

Leki, I. 1990. “Coaching from the margins: issues in written response”, in: Barbara Kroll (ed.), Second language writing: research insights for the classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Leki, I. 1991. “The preferences of ESL students for error correction in collegelevel writing classes”, Foreign Language Annals Vol. 24/3: 203-218.

Makino, Taka-Yoshi. 1993. “Learner self-correction in EFL written compositions”, ELT Journal Vol. 47/4: 337-341.

Radecki, Patricia M. and John M. Swales. 1986. “ESL student reaction to written comments on their work”, System Vol. 13/3: 355-365.

Raimes, Ann. 1983. “Anguish as a second language? Remedies for composition teachers”, in: A. Freedman, I. Pringle, and J. Yalden (eds), Learning to write: first language/second language, pp. 258-272. New York: Longman.

Robb, T., S. Ross, and Shortreed, I. 1986. “Salience of feedback on error and its effect on EFL writing quality”, TESOL Quarterly Vol. 20/1: 83-95.

Schulz, R.A. 1996. “Focus on form in the foreign language classroom: students’ and teachers’ views on error correction and the role of grammar”, Foreign Language Annals Vol. 29/3: 343-364.

Schulz, R.A. 2001. “Cultural differences in student and teacher perceptions concerning the role of grammar instruction and corrective feedback: USAColumbia”, Modern Language Journal Vol. 85/2: 244-258.

Truscott, J. 1996. “The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes”, Language Learning Vol. 46/2: 327-369.

Walz, Joel C. 1982. Error correction techniques for the foreign language classroom. Washington: Center for Applied Linguistics.

Download

Share

COinS