"Increasing caesarean section rates" by Neset Gumusburun and Ergun Mendes
  •  
  •  
 

ORCID ID

Neset Gumusburun: 0000-0003-4746-5414

Ergun Mendes: 0000-0003-4350-6055

Abstract

Background: Although cesarean section is a life-saving procedure in certain situations, it may result in complications for maternal and infant health when conducted, especially for nonmedical purposes. The civil war in Syria has significantly modified the demographic and ethnic structure of Turkey, which has affected the number and type of births occurring here. In this study, we aimed to determine the effect of the increasing Syrian refugee patient population on primary cesarean section rates in Kilis/Turkey.

Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, pregnant women who gave birth at the State Hospital in the Kilis province in Turkiye between 2010 and 2021 were assigned to two groups: Syrian refugees and Turkish women, based on their ethnicity. The numbers, types, and rates of deliveries were separately studied for each group.

Results: A total of 39,537 deliveries took place at our hospital. The 12-year total cesarean section rate was determined to be 25.5%, with the total primary cesarean section rate of 8.8%. While the most common cesarean indication was previous cesarean section, the most common primary cesarean indication was fetal distress.

Conclusions: The tendency of Syrian patients to vaginal delivery, probably owing to cultural factors, has reduced the rate of primary cesarean section in Turkey.

References

  1. Aksakal İ. Türkiye'deki Suriyeli sığınmacılar: Türk toplumsal yapısı ve ulus devlet politikasına etkisi [Syrian refugees in Turkey: Its Impact on Turkish social structure and nation state policy]. Kafkas Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Derg. 2022;30:671–90. Turkish.
  2. Fransen S, de Haas H. Trends and patterns of global refugee migration. Popul Dev Rev. 2022;48:97–128.
  3. Kurtuldu K, Şahin E. Göçün kadın yaşamı ve sağlığı üzerine etkileri [The effects of immigration on women life and health]. Ordu Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Çalışmaları Derg. 2018;1:37–46. Turkish.
  4. Sung S, Mikes BA, Mahdy H. Cesarean section. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024.
  5. Dahlke JD, Mendez-Figueroa H, Maggio L, Sperling JD, Chauhan SP, Rouse DJ. The case for standardizing cesarean delivery technique: Seeing the Forest for the Trees. Obstet Gynecol. 2020;136:972–80.
  6. Mekonnen BD, Asfaw AA. Predictors of successful vaginal birth after a cesarean section in Ethiopia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023;23:65.
  7. Betran AP, Ye J, Moller AB, Souza JP, Zhang J. Trends and projections of caesarean section rates: Global and regional estimates. BMJ Glob Health. 2021;6:e005671.
  8. Al-Husban N, Elmuhtaseb MS, Al-Husban H, Nabhan M, Abuhalaweh H, Alkhatib YM, et al. Anesthesia for cesarean section: Retrospective comparative study. Int J Womens Health. 2021;13:141–52.
  9. Antoine C, Young BK. Cesarean section one hundred years 1920-2020: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly. J Perinat Med. 2020;49:5–16.
  10. Filiz M. Türkiye’de Sezaryen Ameliyatlarına Yönelik Politikaların Analizi [Investigation of study on the cesarean operation carried out in Turkey]. Artvin Çoruh Üniversitesi Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler Derg. 2020;6:74–83. Turkish.
  11. Jenabi E, Khazaei S, Bashirian S, Aghababaei S, Matinnia N. Reasons for elective cesarean section on maternal request: A systematic review. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020;33:3867–72.
  12. Kiremitli S, Kiremitli T, Yılmaz N. Hastanemizde son bir yıl içerisinde yapılan acil ve elektif sezaryen doğum sonuçlarının değerlendirilmesi [Evaluation of the results of emergency and elective cesarean deliveries performed in our hospital in the last year]. Jinekoloji-Obstetrik ve Neonatoloji Tıp Derg. 2022;19:1121–6. Turkish.
  13. Morton R, Burton AE, Kumar P, Hyett JA, Phipps H, McGeechan K, et al. Cesarean delivery: Trend in indications over three decades within a major city hospital network. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020;99:909–16.
  14. Penn Z, Ghaem-Maghami S. Indications for caesarean section. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2001;15:1–15.
  15. Zaigham M, Varallo J, Thangaratinam S, Nicholson W, H A Visser G. Global disparities in caesarean section rates: Why indication-based metrics are needed. PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024;4:e0002877.
  16. Amanak K. Gebelerin Vajinal ve Sezaryen Doğuma Yönelik Görüşleri: Nitel Bir Çalışma [About pregnant women views of cesarean and vaginal delivery: A qualitative study]. Sakarya Üniversitesi Holistik Sağlık Derg. 2022;5:122–40. Turkish.
  17. Umar BU, Haque M. Growing concern over rising caesarean section rates: Is it a problem for low-and middle-income countries only? Adv Hum Biol. 2022;12:93–100.
  18. Iglesias-Benavides J, Cedeño-Morales VM, Guerrero-González G, Guzmán-López A. Labor trials in 300 patients with a previous cesarean section. Med Univ. 2017;19:166–9.
  19. Bülbül M. Primer sezaryen doğum oranını etkileyen faktörler [Factors affecting primary cesarean delivery rate]. Uludağ Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Derg. 2021;47:111–5. Turkish.
  20. Başara BB, Çağlar İS, Aygün A, Özdemir TA, Kulali B, Yentür GK, et al. T.C. Sağlık Bakanlığı Sağlık İstatistikleri Yıllığı 2020 [Ministry of Health of the Republic of Turkey Health Statistics Yearbook 2020]. Ankara: Ministry of Health of the Republic of Turkey; 2020. Turkish.
  21. Mazzoni A, Althabe F, Liu NH, Bonotti AM, Gibbons L, Sánchez AJ, et al. Women's preference for caesarean section: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. BJOG. 2011;118:391–9.
  22. Etcheverry C, Betrán AP, de Loenzien M, Kaboré C, Lumbiganon P, Carroli G, et al. Women's caesarean section preferences: A multicountry cross-sectional survey in low- and middle-income countries. Midwifery. 2024;132:103979.
  23. Akhter S, Schech S. Choosing caesareans? The perceptions and experiences of childbirth among mothers from higher socio-economic households in Dhaka. Health Care Women Int. 2018;39:1177–92.
  24. Elaraby S, Altieri E, Downe S, Erdman J, Mannava S, Moncrieff G, et al. Behavioural factors associated with fear of litigation as a driver for the increased use of caesarean sections: A scoping review. BMJ Open. 2023;13:e070454.
  25. Takegata M, Smith C, Nguyen HAT, Thi HH, Thi Minh TN, Day LT, et al. Reasons for increased caesarean section rate in Vietnam: A qualitative study among Vietnamese mothers and health care professionals. Healthcare (Basel). 2020;8:41.
  26. Güney M, Uzun E, Oral B, Sarikan İ, Bayhan G, Mungan T. Kliniğimizde 2001-2005 yılları arasında sezaryan oranı ve endikasyonları [Cesarean section rates and indications at our clinic between 2001 and 2005]. Uzmanlık Sonrası Eğitim ve Güncel Gelişmeler Derg. 2006;3:249–54. Turkish.
  27. Çağlayan EK, Mustafa K, Gürel Y. Kliniğimizde üç yıllık sezaryen oranı ve endikasyonları [Cesarean section rate and indications in our clinic to theree years]. J Exp Clin Med. 2010;27:50–3. Turkish.
  28. Gourounti K. Cochrane review finds that use of cardiotocograph on admission to the labour ward, rather than intermittent auscultation of the fetal heart rate, may increase risk of caesarean in low-risk women. Evid Based Nurs. 2012;15:106–7.
  29. Tekirdağ Aİ, Cebeci R. Eğitim hastanesinde sezaryen oranları. Jinekoloji Obstetrik Pediatri ve Pediatrik Cerrahi Derg. 2010;2:21–6. Turkish.
  30. Ferreira ÉK, de Almeida MF, Alencar GP, da Silva ZP. Live births of immigrant mothers in Brazil: A population-based study. J Migr Health. 2022;5:100108.
  31. Cho GJ, Kim HY, Ko HS, Cho HJ, Hong SY, Noh E, et al. Pregnancy outcomes of immigrant women living in Korea: A population-based study. PLoS One. 2022;17:e0278193.
  32. Hetherington E, Adhikari K, Scime NV, Metcalfe A. Cesarean deliveries among immigrant and Canadian-born women in a representative community population in Canada: A retrospective cohort study. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2022;44:148–56.
  33. AlArab N, Nabulsi D, El Arnaout N, Dimassi H, Harb R, Lahoud J, et al. Reproductive health of Syrian refugee women in Lebanon: A descriptive analysis of the Sijilli electronic health records database. BMC Womens Health. 2023;23:81.
  34. Kukrer S. Comparison of delivery characteristics and obstetric outcomes of Syrian refugee pregnancies after a decade. Ann Med Res. 2023;30:14–20.

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International License.

Download

Plum Print visual indicator of research metrics
PlumX Metrics
  • Usage
    • Downloads: 107
    • Abstract Views: 45
  • Mentions
    • News Mentions: 1
see details

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.