•  
  •  
 

ORCID ID

Irem Dilaver: 0000-0002-9962-7908

Busra Parlak Somuncu: 0000-0002-0271-7019

Murat Topbas: 0000-0003-4047-4027

Kubra Sahin: 0000-0003-4569-7000

Medine Gozde Ustundag: 0000-0001-6089-9829

Cansu Agrali Gundogmus: 0000-0003-2911-9665

Gamze Can: 0000-0002-7065-649X

Nazim Ercument Beyhun: 0000-0002-4664-9070

Abstract

Background: Pregnancy is an important process that affects the body’s daily water requirements through various mechanisms. Adequate fluid intake also plays a critical role in pregnancy. This research aimed to determine levels of water/fluid intake and influencing factors among pregnant women presenting to a university hospital in Trabzon, Türkiye.

Methods: A total of 1,082 pregnant women were included in this cross-sectional research. A questionnaire was used during the face-to-face interviews to collect data. SPSS version 23.0 software was employed during data analysis, and logistic regression was applied to identify factors that affect adequate daily fluid intake.

Results: The pregnant women in this study consumed a daily mean amount of water amounting to 1.8 ± 0.9 liters and had a mean fluid intake of 2.3 ± 0.9 liters. Results showed that daily fluid intake was inadequate in 557 (51.5%) participants. At the same time, logistic regression analysis revealed higher rates of sufficient daily fluid intake among pregnant women who were informed about water intake by their physicians and women with higher total monthly household incomes.

Conclusions: Fluid intake was lower than the recommended amount for pregnant women in approximately half of the study’s participants. High levels of education, household income, and information about water intake provided by a physician were identified as important factors related to adequate daily fluid intake.

References

  1. Armstrong LE, Johnson EC. Water intake, water balance, and the elusive daily water requirement. Nutrients. 2018;10:1928.
  2. Gandy J. Water intake: Validity of population assessment and recommendations. Eur J Nutr. 2015;54 Suppl 2:11–6.
  3. Ferreira-Pêgo C, Guelinckx I, Moreno LA, Kavouras SA, Gandy J, Martinez H, et al. Total fluid intake and its determinants: Cross-sectional surveys among adults in 13 countries worldwide. Eur J Nutr. 2015;54 Suppl 2:35–43.
  4. EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition, and Allergies (NDA). Scientific opinion on dietary reference values for water. EFSA J. 2010;8:1459.
  5. Soma-Pillay P, Nelson-Piercy C, Tolppanen H, Mebazaa A. Physiological changes in pregnancy. Cardiovasc J Afr. 2016;27:89–94.
  6. Zhou Y, Zhu X, Qin Y, Li Y, Zhang M, Liu W, et al. Association between total water intake and dietary intake of pregnant and breastfeeding women in China: A cross-sectional survey. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19:172.
  7. Alman BL, Coffman E, Siega-Riz AM, Luben TJ; National Birth Defects Prevention Study. Associations between maternal water intake and birth defects in the national birth defects prevention study (2000-2005). Birth Defects Res. 2017;109:193–202.
  8. Mulyani EY, Hardinsyah, Briawan D, Santoso BI. Hydration status of pregnant women in West Jakarta. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2017;26:S26–30.
  9. Karaşahin KE, Alanbay İ. Water and pregnancy. Turkish J Occup Environ Med Saf. 2017;2(1): 227–9.
  10. Institute of Medicine, Food and Nutrition Board, Panel on Dietary Reference Intakes for Electrolytes and Water, Standing Committee on the Scientific Evaluation of Dietary Reference Intakes. Dietary reference intakes for water, potassium, sodium, chloride, and sulfate. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2004.
  11. Republic of Türkiye Ministry of Health. Türkiye beslenme ve sağlık araştırması (TBSA) [Türkiye nutrition and health survey (TBSA)]. Ankara: Republic of Türkiye Ministry of Health, 2019. Turkish.
  12. Martinez H. Fluid consumption by Mexican women during pregnancy and first semester of lactation. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:603282.
  13. Zhu Y, Olsen SF, Mendola P, Halldorsson TI, Rawal S, Hinkle SN, et al. Maternal consumption of artificially sweetened beverages during pregnancy, and offspring growth through 7 years of age: A prospective cohort study. Int J Epidemiol. 2017;46:1499–508.
  14. Petherick ES, Goran MI, Wright J. Relationship between artificially sweetened and sugar-sweetened cola beverage consumption during pregnancy and preterm delivery in a multi-ethnic cohort: Analysis of the Born in Bradford cohort study. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2014;68:404–7.
  15. Azad MB, Sharma AK, De Souza RJ, Dolinsky VW, Becker AB, Mandhane PJ, et al. Association between artificially sweetened beverage consumption during pregnancy and infant body mass index. JAMA Pediatr. 2016;170:662–70.
  16. Mayer-Davis E, Leidy H, Mattes R, Naimi T, Novotny R, Schneeman B, et al. Beverage consumption during pregnancy and birth weight: A systematic review [Internet]. Alexandria (VA): USDA Nutrition Evidence Systematic Review; 2020.
  17. Goran MI, Plows JF, Ventura EE. Effects of consuming sugars and alternative sweeteners during pregnancy on maternal and child health: Evidence for a secondhand sugar effect. Proc Nutr Soc. 2019;78:262–71.
  18. Bardosono S, Prasmusinto D, Hadiati DR, Purwaka BT, Morin C, Pohan R, et al. Fluid intake of pregnant and breastfeeding women in Indonesia: A cross-sectional survey with a seven-day fluid specific record. Nutrients. 2016;8:651.
  19. Malisova O, Protopappas A, Nyktari A, Bountziouka V, Antsaklis A, Zampelas A, et al. Estimations of water balance after validating and administering the water balance questionnaire in pregnant women. Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2014;65:280–5.
  20. Lee KW, Shin D, Song WO. Total water intake from beverages and foods is associated with energy intake and eating behaviors in Korean adults. Nutrients. 2016;8:617.
  21. Brooks CJ, Gortmaker SL, Long MW, Cradock AL, Kenney EL. Racial/ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in hydration status among US adults and the role of tap water and other beverage intake. Am J Public Health. 2017;107:1387–94.
  22. Zhang N, Morin C, Guelinckx I, Moreno LA, Kavouras SA, Gandy J, et al. Fluid intake in urban China: Results of the 2016 Liq.In7 national cross-sectional surveys. Eur J Nutr. 2018;57:77–88.
  23. Aydın EK. Son trimestirdeki primipar ve multipar gebelerin beslenme ve kilo durumlarının değerlendirilmesi [Evaluation of nutrition and weight status of primipar and multipar pregnant women in the last trimester] [thesis]. Erzurum: Atatürk University; 2014. Turkish.
  24. Bookari K, Yeatman H, Williamson M. Informing nutrition care in the antenatal period: Pregnant women's experiences and need for support. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:4856527.
  25. Arrish J, Yeatman H, Williamson M. Australian midwives and provision of nutrition education during pregnancy: A cross-sectional survey of nutrition knowledge, attitudes, and confidence. Women Birth. 2016;29:455–64.
  26. Lee A, Newton M, Radcliffe J, Belski R. Pregnancy nutrition knowledge and experiences of pregnant women and antenatal care clinicians: A mixed methods approach. Women Birth. 2018;31:269–77.

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.