•  
  •  
 

ORCID ID

Aishah Alsolami : 0000-0002-3442-8705

Hanan Alkorashy : 0000-0002-1073-8813

Mysara Alfaki : 0000-0001-5458-8047

Ahmed Alkarani : 0000-0002-1117-5581

Abstract

Background: Healthcare organizations have a dynamic work-environment that changes constantly. This study aimed to explore whether there is a relationship between work-environment uncertainty and nurses’ readiness to participate in organizational change.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted at two tertiary hospitals. The sample size was 222 nurses. A self-report questionnaire was adopted, translated to Arabic, and used for collecting data; it consists of three scales, personal data sheet, organizational readiness for implementing change scale, and perceived environmental uncertainty in hospitals scale. Descriptive statistics t-test and analysis of variance were used to analyze the data.

Results: The level of agreement with the change efficacy statements with the total mean percentage of nurses’ readiness for organizational change (change efficacy) was 67.0%, and it was slightly higher than the commitment statements, in which the total mean percentage of nurses’ readiness for organizational change (change commitment) was 64.2%. In addition, one of the work-environment uncertainty dimensions, which is the individual attribute (need for information), positively correlated with the organizational readiness to change.

Conclusions: The organizational readiness to implement organizational change is high. Environmental complexity was highly perceived among nurses as one of the work-environment uncertainty dimensions. An organizational environment considering employee characteristics must be developed to improve their knowledge, skills, and attitude to adapt to change and uncertainty.

References

  1. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Saudi Vision 2030-Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Riyadh: Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, 2016.
  2. Ministry of Health of Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Statistical Yearbook. Riyadh: Ministry of Health of Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, 2018.
  3. Cullen KL, Edwards BD, Casper WC, Gue KR. Employees’ adaptability and perceptions of change-related uncertainty: Implications for perceived organizational support, job satisfaction, and performance. J Bus Psychol. 2014;29:269–80.
  4. Hatch MJ. Organization theory: Modern, symbolic, and postmodern perspectives. United Kingdom: Oxford University Press; 2018.
  5. Rubinstein S, Martin-Rios C, Erhardt N, Gittell JH, George VP. Organizational responses to uncertainty in the airline industry: Changes in patterns of communication networks. J Air Transp Manag. 2016;57:217–27.
  6. Giardina M. Toxic workplaces override wellness efforts: Stanford professor. New York: Employee Benefit News (EBN), 2014.
  7. Choi M, Ruona WEA. Individual readiness for organizational change and its implications for human resource and organization development. Hum Resour Dev Rev. 2011;10:46–73.
  8. Shea CM, Jacobs SR, Esserman DA, Bruce K, Weiner BJ. Organizational readiness for implementing change: A psychometric assessment of a new measure. Implement Sci. 2014;9:7.
  9. Salyer J. Development and psychometric evaluation of an instrument to measure staff nurses' perception of uncertainty in the hospital environment. J Nurs Meas. 1996;4:33–48.
  10. Kellar SP, Kelvin EA. Munro's statistical methods for health care research. Pennsylvania: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2012.
  11. Deloitte. Global health care outlook: Battling costs while improving care. United Kingdom: Deloitte, 2016.
  12. Watts L, Schoder M, Hodgson D. The experiences of human service managers in contexts of change and uncertainty. Aust Soc Work. 2018;71:306–18.
  13. Prasad B, Junni P. CEO transformational and transactional leadership and organizational innovation: The moderating role of environmental dynamism. Manag Decis. 2016;54:1542–68.
  14. Kovacic Z, Di Felice LJ. Complexity, uncertainty and ambiguity: Implications for European Union energy governance. Energy Res Soc Sci. 2019;53:159–69.
  15. Andargeery SY. Factors associated with turnover intention among newly graduated nurses [dissertation]. Milwaukee: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee; 2019.
  16. Yang Q, Pan J. Control under times of uncertainty: The relationship between hospital competition and physician-patient disputes. Int J Equity Health. 2017;16:205.
  17. Russell KP. The art of clinical supervision: Strategies to assist with the delivery of student feedback. Aust J Adv Nurs. 2019;36:6–13.
  18. Storkholm MH, Savage C, Tessma MK, Salvig JD, Mazzocato P. Ready for the triple aim? Perspectives on organizational readiness for implementing change from a Danish obstetrics and gynecology department. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;19:517.
  19. Almuqati JM, Althomali SH, Alfaki M, Alkarani AS. Relationship between transparency, strategic understanding, and organisation readiness to change among healthcare providers working in the Ministry of Health. Biosci Res. 2022;19:1615–24.
  20. Christensen SS, Wilson BL, Edelman LS. Can I relate? A review and guide for nurse managers in leading generations. J Nurs Manag. 2018;26:689–95.
  21. Paradis E, Sutkin G. Beyond a good story: From Hawthorne Effect to reactivity in health professions education research. Med Educ. 2017;51:31–9.

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.