Background: Ulceration caused by chemical agents used in dental practice for in-office or home-used is a common event, resulting in discomfort and pain. Treatments for such conditions are still being developed, requiring extensive experiments both in vitro and in vivo studies. At present, a standardized experimental mouse model for mucosal ulceration caused by a chemical inducer to study the pathogenesis of ulceration and to develop medications for treatment of ulceration is still not available. The aim of this study was to create a chemically induced model of ulceration of the buccal mucosa of mice. Methods: An in vivo study model of ulceration using a total of 9 mice (Swiss Webster) was performed. All mice received 70% acetic acid application on the left buccal mucosa, while the right buccal mucosa received only saline. Clinical and histological observations of ulcer formation and healing were performed, including the presence of redness and swelling, ulcer diameter, bodyweight as well as epithelial disintegration, dilation of blood vessels, and infiltration of inflammatory cells. Results: Buccal mucosa application of 70% acetic acid generated ulcers on day 2, reached its peak on day 3 and recovered by day 14. The histological features of inflammation were also seen in the ulcer model, and the degree of inflammation was consistent with the day of ulcers. Conclusion: Chemical trauma by the administration of 70% acetic acid effectively induce ulceration on buccal mucosa in mice, and this method can be considered as a novel, reproducible, and clinically relevant model to study pathogenesis and therapeutic approach for treating oral mucosal ulceration.


  1. Hitomi S, Ujihara I, Ono K. Pain mechanism of oral ulcerative mucositis and the therapeutic traditional herbal medicine hangeshashinto. J Oral Biosci. 2019;61:12–5.
  2. Scully C, Shotts R. Mouth ulcers and other causes of orofacial soreness and pain. West J Med 2001;174:421–4.
  3. Lim YS, Kwon SK, Park JH, Cho CG, Park SW, Kim WK. Enhanced mucosal healing with curcumin in animal oral ulcer model. Laryngoscope. 2016;126:E68–73.
  4. Nodai T, Hitomi S, Ono K, Masaki C, Harano N, Morii A, et al. Endothelin-1 elicits TRP-mediated pain in an acid-ınduced oral ulcer model. J Dent Res 2018;97:901–8.
  5. Jayantini R, Suniarti DF, Sarwono AT. Efficacy of a standardized ethanol extract of roselle calyx in the treatment of oral mucosa ulceration (ın vivo). Asian J Pharm Clin Res. 2017;10:183–6.
  6. Cavalcante GM, de Paula RJS, de Souza LP, Sousa FB, Mota MRL, Alves APNN. Experimental model of traumatic ulcer in the cheek mucosa of rats. Acta Cir Bras. 2011;26:227–34.
  7. Idrus E, Pramatama IAM, Suniarti DF, Wimardhani YS, Yuniastuti M. Experimental model of thermally ınduced-tongue ulcer in mice. J Int Dent Med Res. 2019;12:929–34.
  8. De Barros Silva PG, de Code EBB, Freitas MO, de Lima Martin JO, Alves APNN, Sousa FB. Experimental model of oral ulcer in mice: Comparing wound healing in three immunologically distinct animal lines. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2018;22:444.
  9. El-Batal AI, Ahmed SF. Therapeutic effect of Aloe vera and silver nanoparticles on acid-induced oral ulcer in gamma-irradiated mice. Braz Oral Res. 2018;32:1–9.
  10. Builders PF, Kabele-Toge B, Builders M, Chindo BA, Anwunobi PA, Isimi YC, et al. Wound healing potential of formulated extract from hibiscus sabdariffa calyx. Indian J Pharm Sci. 2013;75:45–52.
  11. Vandamme T. Use of rodents as models of human diseases. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2014;6:2–9.
  12. Okabe S, Amagase K. An overview of acetic acid ulcer models: The history and state of the art of peptic ulcer research. Biol Pharm Bull 2005;28:1321–41.
  13. Amirshahrokhi K. Febuxostat attenuates ulcerative colitis by the inhibition of NF-κB, proinflammatory cytokines, and oxidative stress in mice. Int Immunopharmacol. 2019;76:105884.
  14. Oliveira NV de M, Souza BDS, Moita LA, Oliveira LES, Brito FC, Magalhaes DA, et al. Proteins from Plumeria pudica latex exhibit protective effect in acetic acid induced colitis in mice by inhibition of pro-inflammatory mechanisms and oxidative stress. Life Sci. 2019;15: 116535.
  15. Muñoz-Corcuera M, Esparza-Gómez G, González-Moles MA, Bascones-Martínez A. Oral ulcers: Clinical aspects, a tool for dermatologists, part II chronic ulcers. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2009;34;456–61.
  16. Yllmaz N, Nisbet O, Nisbet C, Ceylan G, Hosgor F, Dede OD. Biochemical evaluation of the therapeutic effectiveness of honey in oral mucosal ulcers. Bosn J Basic Med Sci. 2009;9:290–5.
  17. Velnar T, Bailey T, Smrkolj V. The wound healing process: An overview of the cellular and molecular mechanisms. J Int Med Res. 2009;37:1528–42.
  18. Fitzpatrick SG, Cohen DM, Clark AN. Ulcerated Lesions of the Oral Mucosa: Clinical and Histologic Review. Head Neck Pathol. 2019;13:91–102.
  19. Young A, Mcnaught C, Young A. The physiology of wound healing The physiology of wound healing. Wound Care. 2000;9:299–300.
  20. Guo S, DiPietro LA. Factors affecting wound healing. J Dent Res. 2010;89:219–29.



To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.