Abstract
The obligation of graduate students, including Master of Management (MM) students, to publish in academic journal need to be approached wisely. Thus far, research conducted by MM students for their theses has been perceived as lacking practical contribution. This issue is also felt in business and management research in general. However, MM students are expected, in fact, to become profesionals who can offer solution to real problems faced by their organizations. The design science method could be an alternative for MM students to conduct research that is both close to practical application and still offers theoretical contribution.
This article aims to introduce the design science method in research. Started with a debate in academic research, the article then explains the position of design science in the existing polarization of research approaches. The article then details what and how to conduct design science research. Finally, the article presents a guideline in conducting design science research.
References
Denyer, D., Tranfield, D., & Van Aken, J. E. (2008). Developing design propositions through research synthesis. Organization Studies, 29(3), 393–413.
Fendt, J., & Kaminska-Labbé, R. (2011). Relevance and creativity through design-driven action research: Introducing pragmatic adequacy. European Management Journal, 29(3), 217–233.
Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
Gregor, S. (2010). Building theory in a practical science. In Information Systems Foundations: the Role of Design Science (Eds Gregor, S. and Hart, D.). Australian National University Press, Canberra, Australia (pp. 51–74).
Hevner, A. R., March, S. T., Park, J., & Ram, S. (2004). Design science in information systems research. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 28(1), 75–105.
Keskin, D., & Romme, G. (2020). Mixing oil with water: How to effectively teach design science in management education? Brazilian Administration Review, 17(1), 1-21.
Mozota, B. B. (2008). A Theoretical model for design in management science: The paradigm shift in the design profession, from management as a constraint to management as an opportunity. Design Management Journal, 3(1), 30-37
Pandza, K., & Thorpe, R. (2010). Management as design, but what kind of design? An appraisal of the design science analogy for management. British Journal of Management, 21(1), 171–186.
Pfeffer, J., & Sutton, R. I. (2005). Evidence-Based Management. Harvard Business Review, 84(1), 1-12.
Romme, A. G. L. (2003). Making a difference: Organization as design. Organization Science, 14(5), 558–573.
Tranfield, D. (2002). Future challenges for management research. European Management Journal, 20(4), 409–413.
Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207-222.
van Aken, J., Chandrasekaran, A., & Halman, J. (2016). Conducting and publishing design science research: Inaugural essay of the design science department of the Journal of Operations Management. Journal of Operations Management, 47(1), 1–8.
van Aken, J. E. (2004). Management research based on the paradigm of design science: The quest for field-tested and grounded technological rules. Journal of Management Studies 41(2): 219-246.
van Aken, J. E. (2005). Management research as a design science: Articulating the research products of mode 2 knowledge production in management. British Journal of Management, 16(1), 19-36.
van Aken, J. E., & Romme, G. (2009). Reinventing the future: Adding design science to the repertoire of organization and management studies. Organisation Management Journal, 6(1), 5-12.
Wang, M., Vogel, D., & Ran, W. (2011). Creating a performance-oriented e-learning environment: A design science approach. Information & Management, 48(7), 260–269.
Bahasa Abstract
Kewajiban mahasiswa pasca sarjana untuk melakukan publikasi di jurnal ilmiah, termasuk bagi mahasiswa magister manajemen (MM), perlu disikapi secara bijak. Selama ini, penelitian yang dilakukan mahasiswa MM untuk tesis dirasakan kurang memberi manfaat praktis. Isu yang sama juga dirasakan dalam penelitian di bidang bisnis dan manajemen secara umum. Padahal, mahasiswa MM diharapkan menjadi profesional yang dapat menawarkan solusi atas permasalahan real yang dihadapi organisasinya. Metode design science dapat menjadi jalan tengah bagi mahasiswa MM agar penelitian mereka dekat dengan dunia praktis sekaligus tetap menawarkan kontribusi teoretis.
Artikel ini bertujuan untuk memperkenalkan metode design science dalam penelitian. Diawali dengan perdebatan dalam penelitian akademik, artikel ini kemudian menguraikan posisi design science dalam perdebatan dan polarisasi pendekatan penelitian yang ada. Kemudian, artikel ini menguraikan secara lebih detail mengenai apa dan bagaimana melakukan penelitian design science. Terakhir, artikel ini juga mempresentasikan panduan dalam melakukan penelitian design science.
Recommended Citation
Stepanus, Mone
(2023)
"Pendekatan Design Science: Metode Penelitian Alternatif Bagi Mahasiswa Magister Manajemen,"
Jurnal Manajemen dan Usahawan Indonesia: Vol. 46:
Iss.
2, Article 5.
Available at:
https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/jmui/vol46/iss2/5
Included in
Business Administration, Management, and Operations Commons, Management Sciences and Quantitative Methods Commons