Journal of Materials Exploration and Findings
Abstract
The Fitness for Service (FFS) analysis is performed as a quantitative assessment to evaluate the integrity condition of a pipeline. Essentially, FFS assessment helps determine whether equipment components can operate safely despite existing deficiencies. This evaluation is carried out using the Finite Element Method (FEM). In the case of an underwater pipeline that experiences leak due to anchor pull at the flange connection, it undergoes plastic deformation and is lifted approximately 1 meter. As a mitigation step, inspection and repairs have been carried out by the company. Subsequently, modeling is performed to reconstruct the deformation process of the pipeline. Then, analyses are performed for Vortex Induced Vibration (VIV) and fatigue. The results of these analyses indicate that the pipeline is still in an acceptable condition, making it suitable for normal operation. Additionally, flow simulations are considered in the study, with various sensitivities to estimate the remaining service life of the pipeline. Based on sensitivity to flow conditions, the minimum estimated service life of the pipeline is 3 years.
References
A A Engineers 2007, API 579-1/ASME FFS-1 2007 Fitness-for-Service, API Publishing Services, Washington D.C.
A Committee 2021, ASME V Non Destructive Examination, ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel, New York, USA.
BBC 2018, ‘Indonesia declares state of emergency as oil spill spreads’, [Online], Available: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-43625611
D R Aldara, R S Dewi & A M Mulananda 2020, ‘Analisa kerusakan pipa bawah laut akibat dari kejatuhan jangkar’, Jurnal Techno Bahari, 1(October), pp.33-38.
DNV-GL 2017, DNVGL-RP-F105 Recommended Practice Free Spanning Pipelines, DNV-GL, Norway.
EcoWatch 2018, ‘Cracked undersea pipeline caused deadly oil spill in Indonesia’, [Online], Available: https://www.ecowatch.com/oil-pipeline-spill-indonesia-2556434833.html.
J Dong, X Chen, B Wang, W Guan, T Yang, Z Fan & J Pan 2013, ‘Fatigue analysis of free span for submarine pipeline’, ASME Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference: Volume 7 - Operations, Applications and Components.
N T S Board 2024, ‘Anchor strike of underwater pipeline and eventual crude oil release’, [Online], Available: https://www.ntsb.gov/investigations/AccidentReports/Reports/MIR2401.pdf
P W Bearman 2009, ‘Understanding and predicting vortex induced vibrations’, Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 634, pp.1-4.
R Waskito, K B Artana & E Pratiwi 2020, ‘Risk assessment of subsea pipeline using standard DNVGL-RP-RP-F107’, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 557, September
T A S of M Engineers 2021, ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code Section VIII Division 2, The American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York
Recommended Citation
Elriandri, Elriandri and Priadi, Dedi
(2025)
"Analysis of Leakage in Nearshore Pipelines Using Fitness for Service Method to ensure Mechanical Integrity Based on API-579 Level 3,"
Journal of Materials Exploration and Findings: Vol. 4:
Iss.
3, Article 2.
DOI: 10.7454/jmef.v4i3.1071
Available at:
https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/jmef/vol4/iss3/2
Included in
Chemical Engineering Commons, Chemicals and Drugs Commons, Computational Engineering Commons, Condensed Matter Physics Commons, Fluid Dynamics Commons, Materials Chemistry Commons, Materials Science and Engineering Commons, Mechanical Engineering Commons, Mining Engineering Commons, Natural Products Chemistry and Pharmacognosy Commons, Operations Research, Systems Engineering and Industrial Engineering Commons, Other Engineering Commons, Polymer Chemistry Commons, Risk Analysis Commons, Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics Commons
