Equipment Criticality Analysis to Determine Asset Integrity Management System Scheme in Supporting Production Optimization Scenarios in the Aeging Field

Authors

Donny Andryanto, Departement Metallurgical and Materials, Faculty of Engineering Universitas IndonesiaFollow
Donanta Dhaneswara, Departement Metallurgical and Materials, Faculty of Engineering Universitas IndonesiaFollow

Abstract

This research investigates the production decline and cost increase in the X&Y oil and gas fields from 2022 to 2023. Production fell by 34%, while production costs per barrel rose by 79%. To address these issues, a series of optimization processes are proposed. These aim to restructure and enhance the production facilities to reduce current production costs. The optimizations include reducing pressure at the PPP Platform in 2024. Additional steps include shutting down CPP-ORF 14” pipelines and most processes at CPP 2 Platform by 2027 to convert it into an accommodation platform. Further, the plan involves optimizing the release of two FSO units and directing oil production to ORF via a 16” pipeline by 2028. This study also emphasizes the need for Asset Integrity Management to implement optimization scenarios. This measure aims to reduce maintenance costs, ensure plant integrity, and update maintenance programs based on equipment criticality assessments.

References

American Petroleum Institute 2006, Pressure Vessel Inspection Code: In-service inspection, rating, repair, and alteration API 510, API Publishing Service, Washington D.C.

American Petroleum Institute 2014, API 510 Pressure Vessel Inspection Code: In-service inspection, rating, repair, and alteration, 10th edn, API Publishing Service, Washington D.C.

American Petroleum Institute 2016, API RP 581: Risk-Based Inspection Methodology, 3rd edn, API Publishing Service, Washington D.C.

Arunraj, N S & Maiti, J 2007, ‘Risk-based maintenance—Techniques and applications’, Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 142, no. 3, pp. 653–661.

ASME 2021, ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section VIII Division 1, ASME Publishing, New York.

Bakker, S J, Kleiven, A, Fleten, S-E & Tomasgard, A 2018, ‘Mature offshore oil field development: Solving a real options problem using stochastic dual dynamic integer programming’, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Dept of Industrial Economics and Technology Management.

Bakker, S J, Kleiven, A, Fleten, S-E & Tomasgard, A 2018, ‘Mature offshore oil field development: Solving a real options problem using stochastic dual dynamic integer programming’, Department of Industrial Economics and Technology Management, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway.

Bhatia, K, Khan, F, Patel, H & Abbassi, R 2019, ‘Dynamic risk-based inspection methodology’, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, vol. 62, 103974.

Chien, C H, Chen, C H & Chao, Y J 2009, ‘A strategy for the risk-based inspection of pressure safety valves’, Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol. 94, no. 4, pp. 810–818.

Geary, W 2002, ‘Risk based inspection: a case study evaluation of offshore process plant’, Health and Safety Laboratory, Sheffield, UK.

Haladuick, S & Dann, M R 2016, ‘Genetic algorithm for inspection and maintenance planning of deteriorating structural systems: Application to pressure vessels’, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Calgary, Canada.

Hu, J & Zhang, L 2017, ‘Risk based opportunistic maintenance model for complex mechanical systems’, College of Mechanical and Transportation Engineering, China University of Petroleum, Beijing.

Karthikeyan, K M B, Balasubramanian, T, Bruce, A R & Premkumar, P 2016, ‘Pressure vessel design by design by analysis route’, St. Joseph’s College of Engineering, Mechanical Department, India.

Kraidi, L, Shah, R, Matipa, W & Borthwick, F 2021, ‘An investigation of mitigating the safety and security risks allied with oil and gas pipeline projects’, Journal of Pipeline Science and Engineering, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 349–359, doi:10.1016/j.jpse.2021.08.002.

Liao, K, Qin, M, He, G, Chen, S, Jiang, X & Zhang, S 2023, ‘Improvement of integrity management for pressure vessels based on risk assessment – A natural gas separator case study’, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, vol. 83, art. no. 105087, doi:10.1016/j.jlp.2023.105087.

Long, D A & McCavit, J 2011, ‘Minimize mechanical integrity budget battles’, Chemical Engineering Progress, vol. 107, no. 2, pp. 27–33.

Sharma, R & Pachauri, A 2023, ‘A review of pressure vessels regarding their design, manufacturing, testing, materials, and inspection’, Materials Today: Proceedings, doi:10.1016/j.matpr.2023.03.258.

Shishesaz, M R, Bajestani, M N, Hashemi, S J & Shekari, E 2013, ‘Comparison of API 510 pressure vessels inspection planning with API 581 risk-based inspection planning approaches’, International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, vol. 111–112, pp. 202–208.

Wakiru, J, Muchiri, P N, Pintelon, L & Chemweno, P 2019, ‘A cost-based failure prioritization approach for selecting maintenance strategies for thermal power plants: a case study context of developing countries’, Society for Reliability Engineering, Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM) & Lulea University of Technology.

Wang, Y, et al. 2022, ‘Remaining lifetime assessment of 141,000-hour service-aged forge 91-pipe 91 steel header welds with novel in-situ digital image correlation’, Materials & Design, vol. 222.

Wasim, M & Djukic, M B 2022, ‘External corrosion of oil and gas pipelines: A review of failure mechanisms and predictive preventions’, Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, vol. 100, p. 104467, doi:10.1016/j.jngse.2022.104467.

Yacine, B, Mébarek, D & Hefaidh, H 2020, ‘Contribution to the ageing control of onshore oil and gas fields’, Petroleum, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 311–317, doi:10.1016/j.petlm.2019.11.006.

Recommended Citation

Andryanto, Donny and Dhaneswara, Donanta (2025) "Equipment Criticality Analysis to Determine Asset Integrity Management System Scheme in Supporting Production Optimization Scenarios in the Aeging Field," Journal of Materials Exploration and Findings: Vol. 4: Iss. 3, Article 1.
DOI: 10.7454/jmef.v4i3.1067
Available at: https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/jmef/vol4/iss3/1