Journal of Materials Exploration and Findings
Abstract
Fuel transfer operations at Fuel Terminal ‘X’ constitute a critical stage in the energy supply chain, where complex interactions among human, technical, and environmental factors generate inherent risks of fire and explosion. The flammable nature of fuel oil, coupled with the possibility of vapor or liquid releases outcoming by tool failures, connection leaks, or control system malfunctions, underscores the need for robust and proactive risk management strategies. This study aims to evaluate and mitigate these risks by applying Quantitative Risk Assessment (QRA). The assessment utilized the Parts Count method to foercast generic component failure rates and Fault Tree Analysis (FTA) to classify potential failure pathways that could head to hazardous fuel release scenarios. Consequences were modeled with SAFETI software, enabling a detailed examination of thermal radiation spread by fires, overpressures by blasts, and the determination of risk exposure zones for human populations in the vicinity. Further application of control systems like gas leak detectors, flame detectors, and the automatic/manual shutdown and isolation systems reduced the IRPA to an acceptable risk level. These findings emphasize the importance of combining quantitative risk modelling and systematic safety barriers to improve the operational safety. It is anticipated that these results will support the preparation of risk assessment protocols and safety policy guidelines for fuel handling facilities in the oil and gas sector.
References
AIChE (n.d.), LOPA Data, viewed 1 July 2025, https://www.aiche.org/ccps/resources/tools/lopa.
Ale, B J M, Hartford, D N D & Slater, D 2015, ‘ALARP and CBA all in the same game’, Safety Science, vol. 76, pp. 90–100, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2015.02.012.
API RP 752 2009, Management of Hazards Associated with Location of Process Plant Permanent Buildings, American Petroleum Institute, Washington, D.C.
Buncefield Major Incident Investigation Board 2008, The Buncefield Incident: The final report of the Major Incident Investigation Board, Volume 1, Crown copyright, ISBN 978 0 7176 6270 8.
Construction Week Online 2025, How flame detection can enhance workplace safety, viewed 1 July 2025, https://www.constructionweekonline.com/business/insights/flame-detection-safe-workplace.
Crowl, D A & Louvar, J F 2020, Chemical Process Safety: Fundamentals with Applications, 4th edn, Pearson.
detikNews 2010, Depo Pertamina Mataram Terbakaar, 2 Orang Terluka, viewed 2 May 2025, https://news.detik.com/berita/d-1280773/depo-pertamina-mataram-terbakaar-2-orang-terluka.
Durukan, O, Akyuz, E, Destanoğlu, O, Arslanoğlu, Y & Sezer, Ş I 2024, ‘Quantitative HAZOP and D-S evidence theory-fault tree analysis approach to predict fire and explosion risk in inert gas system on-board tanker ship’, Ocean Engineering, vol. 308, 118274.
Ericson, C A II 2015, Hazard Analysis Techniques for System Safety, 2nd edn, Wiley.
Fuentes-Bargues, J L, González-Cruz, M C, González-Gaya, C & Balart-Pérez, M P 2017, ‘Risk Analysis of a Fuel Storage Terminal Using HAZOP and FTA’, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 14, no. 7, p. 704, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14070704.
Gewee 2024, The Critical Role of Flame Detectors in Industrial Production, viewed 1 July 2025, https://www.geweedetector.com/the-critical-role-of-flame-detectors-in-industrial-production/.
Gexcon 2024, How to do a Quantitative Risk Assessment (QRA), viewed 1 July 2025, https://www.gexcon.com/blog/how-to-do-a-quantitative-risk-assessment-qra/.
Gupta, P, Hurburgh, C R, Bowers, E L & Mosher, G A 2022, ‘Application of fault tree analysis: Failure mode and effect analysis to evaluate critical factors influencing non-GM segregation in the US grain and feed supply chain’, Cereals and Grains, https://doi.org/10.1002/cche.10601.
Inteccon (n.d.), Improve industrial safety with a gas detector, viewed 1 July 2025, https://inteccon.com/blog/gas-detector/.
IOGP (International Association of Oil & Gas Producers) 2010, IOGP Data Directory No 434: Release Frequency Data.
ISO (International Organization for Standardization) 2018, Risk management — Guidelines, ISO 31000:2018, 2nd edn, viewed 10 May 2025, https://standards.iteh.ai/catalog/standards/sist/aac269d2-3e9b-4fd1-b678-1df56c39129d/iso-31000-2018.
Juwari, J, Anugraha, R P, Zanata, M, Leksono, N A, Hamid, M D & Cahyono, T 2024, ‘Quantitative risk assessment and risk reduction of worst-case accident scenario at fuel storage terminal’, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, vol. 88, 105272.
Kompas 2023, Fire at Pertamina Plumpang Depot, viewed 10 May 2025, https://www.kompas.com/tren/read/2023/03/04/094213065/5-fakta-kebakaran-depo-pertamina-plumpang?page=all.
Mannan, M S 2014, Lee's Loss Prevention in the Process Industries: Hazard Identification, Assessment and Control, Butterworth-Heinemann.
NTNU (n.d.), Risk Metrics, viewed 1 July 2025, https://www.ntnu.edu/ross/risk/risk-metrics.
ORS Consulting 2023, QRA - Personnel Risk Metrics, viewed 1 July 2025, https://www.ors-consulting.com/qra-personnel-risk-metrics.
Petrohab 2024, Averting Industrial Disasters: How Safety Shutdown Systems Work in Hazardous Areas, viewed 1 July 2025, https://petrohab.com/averting-industrial-disasters-how-safety-shutdown-systems-work-in-hazardous-areas/.
Spouge, J 1999, A Guide to Quantitative Risk Assessment for Offshore Installations, DNV Technica, ISBN I 870553 365.
Tauseef, S M, Abbasi, T, Suganya, R & Abbasi, S A 2017, ‘A critical assessment of available software for forecasting the impact of accidents in chemical process industry’, International Journal of Engineering, Science and Mathematics, vol. 6, no. 7, pp. 1–10.
Technocontrol Corp. (n.d.), Safety Shutdown Systems in Process Control, viewed 1 July 2025, https://technocontrolcorp.com/safety-shutdown-systems-in-process-control/.
U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration 2017, Process Safety Management for Petroleum Refineries: Lessons Learned from the Petroleum Refinery Process Safety Management National Emphasis Program, OSHA 3918-08.
UK HSE 2001, Reducing Risks, Protecting People: HSE's Decision-Making Process, Health and Safety Executive.
Uniphos 2024, The Crucial Role of Gas Detection in Industrial Safety, viewed 1 July 2025, https://uniphos-envirotronic.com/the-crucial-role-of-gas-detection-in-industrial-safety/.
Yang, W, Du, B, He, C & Sterpone, L 2017, ‘Reliability assessment on 16 nm ultrascale+ MPSoC using fault injection and fault tree analysis’, Microelectronics Reliability, vol. 78, pp. 112–121, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microrel.2017.05.007.
Recommended Citation
Sulistyawan, Angga Wahyu and Yuliusman, Yuliusman
(2025)
"Fire and Explosion Hazard Risk Analysis of Fuel Transfer Activities at Fuel Terminal “X” Utilizing the Quantitative Risk Analysis (QRA) Method,"
Journal of Materials Exploration and Findings: Vol. 4:
Iss.
2, Article 5.
DOI: 10.7454/jmef.v4i2.1097
Available at:
https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/jmef/vol4/iss2/5






