•  
  •  
 

Journal of Materials Exploration and Findings (JMEF)

Abstract

High temperature hydrogen attack (HTHA) is a commonly observed harm component in carbon steels exposed to high temperature and pressure in a hydrogen-rich environment. Hydrogen together with carbon responds to produce methane. The formation of methane bubbles in steel can lead to loss of fracture toughness and lead to intergranular cracking. The main challenge of this problem lies in early warning systems that can detect these bubble clusters before they reach the advanced stage. Several advanced ultrasonic inspections have been developed over the years due to the challenges of inspecting materials for defects and discontinuities. These cover time-of-flight diffraction (ToFD), phased array ultrasonic testing (PAUT), total focusing method (TFM), multi-mode total focusing method (MTFM), and others. However, these ultrasonic techniques used are typically used to detect all possible material defects. This paper briefly discusses the advantages and disadvantages of these techniques. MTFM has been successfully applied to characterize isolated or clustered signs, whether tilted or not, using high-frequency probes. The defects grouped in this paper are believed to be methane bubbles or HTHA. ToFD defect screening before aims to save time and money.

References

[1] Martin, M.L., Dadfarnia, M., Orwig, S., Moore, D. and Sofronis, P., 2017. A microstructure-based mechanism of cracking in high temperature hydrogen attack. Acta Materialia, 140, pp.300-304.

[2] Lesage, J.C., Marvasti, M. and Farla, O., 2021. Vector coherence imaging for enhancement of small omni-directional scatterers and suppression of geometric reflections. NDT & E International, 123, p.102502.

[3] Sarbayev, M., Yang, M. and Wang, H., 2019. Risk assessment of process systems by mapping fault tree into artificial neural network. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 60, pp.203-212.

[4] Hartoyo, F., 2022. The Optimization Of Failure Risk Estimation On The Uniform Corrosion Rate With A Non-Linear Function. Journal of Materials Exploration and Findings (JMEF), 1(1), p.3.

[5] Engelhart, M.D. and Moughamian, H., 1971. Book Reviews : Book Reviews. Educ. Psychol. Meas., 31(4), pp.1029-1029.

[6] Hartoyo, F., Irianti, G.P., Fatriansyah, J.F., Ovelia, H., Mas' ud, I.A., Digita, F.R., Fauzi, A. and Anis, M., 2023. Weibull distribution optimization for piping risk calculation due to uniform corrosion using Monte Carlo method. Materials Today: Proceedings.

[7] Veiga, J.L.B.C., De Carvalho, A.A., Da Silva, I.C. and Rebello, J.M.A., 2005. The use of artificial neural network in the classification of pulse-echo and TOFD ultra-sonic signals. Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, 27, pp.394-398.

[8] Jasiūnienė, E., Mažeika, L., Samaitis, V., Cicėnas, V. and Mattsson, D., 2019. Ultrasonic non-destructive testing of complex titanium/carbon fibre composite joints. Ultrasonics, 95, pp.13-21.

[9] Ye, J., Ito, S. and Toyama, N., 2018. Computerized ultrasonic imaging inspection: From shallow to deep learning. Sensors, 18(11), p.3820.

[10] Forsyth, D.S., 2009. Nondestructive testing of corrosion in the aerospace industry. In Corrosion control in the aerospace industry (pp. 111-130). Woodhead Publishing.

[11] Shewmon, P.G., 1985. Hydrogen attack of pressure-vessel steels. Materials Science and Technology, 1(1), pp.2-11.

[12] Van der Burg, M.W.D. and Van der Giessen, E., 1996. Non-uniform hydrogen attack cavitation and the role of interaction with creep. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 220(1-2), pp.200-214.

[13] Poorhaydari, K., 2019. Failure of a hydrogenerator reactor inlet piping by high-temperature hydrogen attack. Engineering Failure Analysis, 105, pp.321-336.

[14] Dhaneswara, D., Suharno, B., Ariobimo, R.D.S., Sambodo, D.B. and Fatriansyah, J.F., 2018. Effect of Coating Layer of Sand Casting Mold in Thin-Walled Ductile Iron Casting: Reducing the Skin Effect Formation. International Journal of Metalcasting, 12, pp.362-369.

[15] Zhou, B., Tian, T.T., Zhu, G., Zhao, J.B. and Liu, D.H., 2022. An ultrasonic testing method for wall thickness of turbine blades. Measurement, 198, p.111357.

[16] Andria, G., Attivissimo, F. and Giaquinto, N., 2001. Digital signal processing techniques for accurate ultrasonic sensor measurement. Measurement, 30(2), pp.105-114.

[17] Marció, B.S., Nienheysen, P., Habor, D. and Flesch, R.C., 2019. Quality assessment and deviation analysis of three-dimensional geometrical characterization of a metal pipeline by pulse-echo ultrasonic and laser scanning techniques. Measurement, 145, pp.30-37.

[18] Mayworm, R.C., Alvarenga, A.V. and Costa-Felix, R.P.B., 2021. A metrological approach to the time of flight diffraction method (ToFD). Measurement, 167, p.108298.

[19] Baby, S., Balasubramanian, T., Pardikar, R.J., Palaniappan, M. and Subbaratnam, R., 2003. Time-of-flight diffraction (TOFD) technique for accurate sizing of cracks embedded in sub-cladding. Insight-Non-Destructive Testing and Condition Monitoring, 45(9), pp.600-604.

[20] Kröning, M., Bulavinov, A., Reddy, K.M., von Bernus, L. and Joneit, D., 2007, April. Sampling phased array: a new technique for signal processing and ultrasonic imaging. In Nondestructive Characterization for Composite Materials, Aerospace Engineering, Civil Infrastructure, and Homeland Security 2007 (Vol. 6531, pp. 322-333). SPIE.

[21] Felice, M.V., Velichko, A. and Wilcox, P.D., 2014. Accurate depth measurement of small surface-breaking cracks using an ultrasonic array post-processing technique. Ndt & E International, 68, pp.105-112.

[22] Zhang, J., Drinkwater, B.W., Wilcox, P.D. and Hunter, A.J., 2010. Defect detection using ultrasonic arrays: The multi-mode total focusing method. NDT & e International, 43(2), pp.123-133.

[23] Perrot, V., Polichetti, M., Varray, F. and Garcia, D., 2021. So you think you can DAS? A viewpoint on delay-and-sum beamforming. Ultrasonics, 111, p.106309.

[24] Holmes, C., Drinkwater, B.W. and Wilcox, P.D., 2005. Post-processing of the full matrix of ultrasonic transmit–receive array data for non-destructive evaluation. NDT & e International, 38(8), pp.701-711.

[25] Wijesinghe, C.J. and Khandelwal, B., 2021. Impact of alternative fuel properties on combustion instabilities, noise, and vibrations. In Aviation Fuels (pp. 219-236). Academic Press.

[26] Kumar, A., 2020. Phased array ultrasonic imaging using angle beam virtual source full matrix capture-total focusing method. NDT & E International, 116, p.102324.

[27] Pitkänen, J. and Oy, P., 2006. SAFT-is it a tool for improved sizing in ultrasonic testing. Olkiluoto, Finnland, ECNDT.

[28] Olofsson, T. and Stepinski, T., 2009. Frequency-domain SAFT for the Ultrasonic Inspection of Coarse Grained Metals. In 7th International Conference on NDE in Relation to Structural Integrity for Nuclear and Pressurized Components, Yokohama.

[29] Ge, L., Li, Q., Wang, Z., Li, Q., Lu, C., Dong, D. and Wang, H., 2023. High-resolution ultrasonic imaging technology for the damage of concrete structures based on total focusing method. Computers and Electrical Engineering, 105, p.108526.

[30] Zhang, J., Barber, T., Nixon, A. and Wilcox, P., 2017, February. Investigation into distinguishing between small volumetric and crack-like defects using multi-view total focusing method images. In AIP conference proceedings (Vol. 1806, No. 1, p. 040003). AIP Publishing LLC.

[31] Safari, A., Zhang, J., Velichko, A. and Drinkwater, B.W., 2018. Assessment methodology for defect characterisation using ultrasonic arrays. NDT & E International, 94, pp.126-136.

[32] Wilcox, P.D., Croxford, A.J., Budyn, N., Bevan, R.L., Zhang, J., Kashubin, A. and Cawley, P., 2020. Fusion of multi-view ultrasonic data for increased detection performance in non-destructive evaluation. Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 476(2243), p.20200086.

[33] Array, P. and Detector, F. Confidence You Can See Innovative TFM TFM Images with.

[34] da Cruz Payão Filho, J., Maia, V.P., Passos, E.K.D., Gonzaga, R.S. and Juliano, D.R., 2022. Probability of detection of discontinuities by ultrasonic phased array inspection of 9% Ni steel joints welded with alloy 625 as the filler metal. Ultrasonics, 119, p.106582.

[35] Ciorau, P., 2005. Contribution to detection and sizing linear defects by conventional and phased array ultrasonic techniques. Journal of Nondestructive Testing, 10(9), pp.233-239.

[36] Camacho, J., Atehortua, D., Cruza, J.F., Brizuela, J. and Ealo, J., 2018. Ultrasonic crack evaluation by phase coherence processing and TFM and its application to online monitoring in fatigue tests. Ndt & E International, 93, pp.164-174.

[37] Budyn, N., Croxford, A.J., Bevan, R.L., Zhang, J. and Wilcox, P.D., 2021. Characterisation of small embedded two-dimensional defects using multi-view Total Focusing Method imaging algorithm. NDT & E International, 119, p.102413.

[38] Holmes, C., Drinkwater, B. and Wilcox, P., 2004. The post-processing of ultrasonic array data using the total focusing method. Insight-Non-Destructive Testing and Condition Monitoring, 46(11), pp.677-680.

[39] Olympus NDT., 2016. Phased array probes and wedges. p. 32.

Download

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.