•  
  •  
 

Abstract

Education is one of the most fundamental of human capital. The right to education is written in UUD 1945 and policy of compulsory education has already been implemented, yet the mean years of schooling in Indonesia is still low. It is assumed that there is education inequality. Method of analysis used in this research is panel data regression model FEM with FGLS–SUR. The research finds that education inequality in Indonesia is classified as low inequality in the past 5 years and is effected significantly by gender equality, government budget, unemployment rate, and Gini ratio.

Bahasa Abstract

Pendidikan merupakan salah satu modal manusia yang sangat mendasar. Hak untuk memperoleh pendidikan diatur dalam UUD 1945 dan program wajib belajar sudah digalakkan pemerintah namun nyatanya rata-rata lama bersekolah penduduk Indonesia masih cukup rendah. Hal ini diduga akibat adanya ketimpangan capaian pendidikan penduduk. Metode analisis dalam penelitian ini menggunakan analisis data panel FEM dengan metode estimasi FGLS–SUR. Hasil penelitian menemukan bahwa ketimpangan pendidikan di Indonesia tergolong ke dalam kategori ketimpangan rendah selama 5 tahun terakhir dan dipengaruhi secara signifikan oleh kesetaraan gender, anggaran pemerintah, tingkat pengangguran, dan rasio Gini.

References

  1. Amin, A. M.,Wattimena, C. R. J., & Asani, R. N. C. P. (2019). Ketimpangan capaian pendidikan di Indonesia tahun 2008–2017 dan determinannya tahun 2017 (Skripsi, Politeknik Statistika STIS).
  2. Baloch, A., Noor, Z. M., Habibullah, M. S., & Bani, Y. (2017). The impact of gender equality on education inequality: A global analysis based on GMM dynamic panel estimation. International Journal of Economics and Management, 11(S3), 691-714.
  3. Bustomi, M. J. (2012). Ketimpangan pendidikan antar kabupaten/kota dan implikasinya di Provinsi Jawa Tengah. Economics Development Analysis Journal, 1(2), 10 p. doi: https: //doi.org/10.15294/edaj.v1i2.477.
  4. Chaudhry, I. S., & Rahman, S. (2009). The impact of gender inequality in education on rural poverty in Pakistan: an empirical analysis. European Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Sciences, 15(1), 174-188.
  5. Coady, D. & Dizioli, A. (2017). Income Inequality and education revisited: persistence, endogeneity, and heterogeneity. International Monetary Fund. IMF Working Paper WP/17/126. Diakses 28 Juni 2020 dari https: //www.imf.org/en/Publications/WP/Issues/2017/05/26/ Income-Inequality-and-Education-Revisited-Persistence- Endogeneity-and-Heterogeneity-44854.
  6. Hamzah, F., Rosyadi, & Kartika, M. (2017). Pengaruh pengeluaran pemerintah bidang pendidikan, gender gap dan pendapatan per kapita terhadap ketimpangan pendidikan dan ketimpangan pendapatan kabupaten /kota di Provinsi Kalimantan Barat. Jurnal Ekonomi Bisnis dan Kewirausahaan, 6(2), 77-96. doi: http: //dx.doi.org/10.26418/jebik.v6i2.22985.
  7. Kearney, M. S. & Levine, P. B. (2016). Income inequality, social mobility, and the decision to drop out of high school. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Economic Studies Program, The Brookings Institution, vol. 47(1 (Spring), pp. 333-396. Diakses 28 Juni 2020 dari https://www.brookings.edu/bpea-articles/ income-inequality-social-mobility-and-the-decision-todrop- out-of-high-school/.
  8. Mankiw, N. G. (2016). Macroeconomics (9th edition). Worth Publisher.
  9. Maozhong, L., & Hua, S. (2011). Educational inequality analysis: international comparison. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(16), 88-93.
  10. Mayer, S. E. (2010). The relationship between income inequality and inequality in schooling. Theory and Research in Education, 8(1), 5-20. doi: https: //doi.org/10.1177/1477878509356346.
  11. Mufidah Ch. (2004). Paradigma gender. Bayumedia Publishing.
  12. Rahayu, A. (2005). Ketimpangan pendidikan di Indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomi & Studi Pembangunan, 6(1), 21-40.
  13. Senadza, B. (2012). Education inequality in Ghana: gender and spatial dimensions. Journal of Economic Studies, 39(6), 724-739. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/01443581211274647.
  14. Sheehan, K. (2012). Does gender inequality in education affect educational outcomes? (Theses, University of Connecticut). Diakses 15 Januari 2020 dari https://opencommons.uconn. edu/srhonors_theses/251/.
  15. Sholikhah, N., Suratman, B., Soesatyo, Y., & Soejoto, A. (2014). Analisis faktor yang memengaruhi ketimpangan pendidikan. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 20(2), 176-182.
  16. The Citizen. (2017, September 12). How, unemployment, affecting, education. Diakses 29 Juni 2020 dari https://www.thecitizen.co.tz/magazine/ success/How-unemployment-is-affecting-education/ 1843788-4092328-12gwywj/index.html.
  17. Thomas, V., Wang, Y., & Fan, X. (2001). Measuring education inequality: Gini coefficients of education. Policy Research Working Paper, 2525. World Bank. Diakses 30 Mei 2020 dari https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/ 19738.
  18. Todaro, M. P. (2000). Pembangunan ekonomi di dunia ketiga. Erlangga.
  19. Todaro, M. P. & Smith, S.C. (2011). Pembangunan Ekonomi (Edisi kesebelas). Erlangga.
  20. Trabelsi, S. (2013). Regional inequality of education in Tunisia: An evaluation by the Gini Index. Région et Développement, 37, 98-117.

Download

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.