•  
  •  
 

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to estimate the influence of family involvement through business ownership (own capital) and the involvement of family members (family workers) in companies/micro and small enterprises in Indonesia on the productivity of their business. Based on previous studies, family involvement can decrease and increase productivity. With relatively small capital, less qualified workforce and low technology productivity of micro and small industries that employ family members within the company will tend to be lower because they will be more avoiding risky changes. The role of innovation can be proven as moderate in the research is expected to improve the productivity of micro and small industries in Indonesia.

Bahasa Abstract

Penelitian ini membahas tentang pengaruh keterlibatan keluarga melalui kepemilikan usaha (modal sendiri) dan keterlibatan anggota keluarga (pekerja keluarga) dalam perusahaan/usaha mikro dan kecil di Indonesia terhadap produktivitas usahanya. Berdasarkan penelitian terdahulu keterlibatan keluarga dapat menurunkan dan meningkatkan produktivitas. Dengan modal yang relatif kecil, tenaga kerja yang kurang berkualitas dan teknologi yang rendah, produktivitas industri mikro dan kecil yang mempekerjakan anggota keluarga dalam perusahaannya akan cenderung lebih rendah karena perusahaan akan lebih menghindari perubahan yang cenderung berisiko. Peran inovasi dapat dibuktikan sebagai moderasi dalam penelitian diharapkan mampu meningkatkan produktivitas industri mikro dan kecil di Indonesia.

References

[1] Astrachan, J. H., & Shanker, M. C. (2003). Family businesses’ contribution to the US economy: A closer look. Family Business Review, 16(3), 211-219. doi: https: //doi.org/10.1177%2F08944865030160030601.

[2] Barbera, F., & Moores, K. (2013). Firm ownership and productivity: A study of family and non-family SMEs. Small Business Economics, 40(4), 953-976. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-011-9405-9.

[3] Barth, E., Gulbrandsen, T., & Schønea, P. (2005). Family ownership and productivity: The role of ownermanagement. Journal of Corporate Finance, 11(1-2), 107-127. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2004.02.001.

[4] BPS. (2014a). Profil Industri Mikro dan Kecil 2014. Badan Pusat Statistik.

[5] BPS. (2014b). Survei Industri Mikro dan Kecil Tahunan Tahun 2014. Badan Pusat Statistik.

[6] Carney, M. (2005). Corporate governance and competitive advantage in family-controlled firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(3), 249-265. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1540-6520.2005.00081.x.

[7] Daily, C. M., & Thompson, S. S. (1994). Ownership structure, strategic posture, and firm growth: An empirical examination. Family Business Review, 7(3), 237-249. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1994.00237.x.

[8] Damiani, M., Pompei, F., & Ricci, A. (2014). Enterprise-level bargaining and labour productivity of Italian family firms: A quantile regression analysis. MPRA Paper No. 60380. Munich Personal RePEc Archive. Diakses 12 Januari 2018 dari https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/60380/.

[9] Demsetz, H., & Lehn, K. (1985). The structure of corporate ownership: Causes and consequences. Journal of Political Economy, 93(6), 1155-1177. doi: https://doi.org/10.1086/261354.

[10] Dyer, W. G. (1988). Culture and continuity in family firms. Family Business Review, 1(1), 37-50. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1741-6248.1988.00037.x.

[11] Eddleston, K. A., & Kellermanns, F. W. (2007). Destructive and productive family relationships: A stewardship theory perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(4), 545-565. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2006.06.004.

[12] European Commission. (2009). Overview of family business-relevant issues: research, networks, policy measures and existing studies. European Commission Enterprise and Industry Directorate-General. Diakses 12 Januari 2018 dari www.ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/ sme/promoting-entrepreneurship/family-business/ family business expert group report en.pdf.

[13] Ford, L. R., & Seers, A. (2006). Relational leadership and team climates: Pitting differentiation versus agreement. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(3), 258-270. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.02.005.

[14] Gomez-Mejıa, L. R., Haynes, K. T., Nunez-Nickel, M., Jacobson, K. J., & Moyano-Fuentes, J. (2007). Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family-controlled firms: Evidence from Spanish olive oil mills. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(1), 106-137. doi: https: //doi.org/10.2189%2Fasqu.52.1.106.

[15] Habbershon, T. G., & Williams, M. L. (1999). A resource based framework for assessing the strategic advantages of family firms. Family Business Review, 12(1), 1-25. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1741-6248.1999.00001.x.

[16] Habbershon, T. G., Williams, M., & MacMillan, I. C. (2003). A unified systems perspective of family firm performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(4), 451-465. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00053-3.

[17] Hayton, J. C., & Kelley, D. J. (2006). A competency based framework for promoting corporate entrepreneurship. Human Resource Management, 45(3), 407-427. doi: https: //doi.org/10.1002/hrm.20118.

[18] Kellermanns, F.W., Eddleston, K. A., Sarathy, R., & Murphy, F. (2012). Innovativeness in family firms: A family influence perspective. Small Business Economics, 38(1), 85-101. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-010-9268-5.

[19] Lansberg, I. (1988). The succession conspiracy. Family Business Review, 1(2), 119-143. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741- 6248.1988.00119.x.

[20] Marins, L. M. (2008). The challenge of measuring innovation in emerging economies’ firms: A proposal of a new set of indicators on innovation. UNU-MERIT Working Papers, 044. Maastricht: UNU-MERIT, Maastricht Economic and Social Research and Training Centre on Innovation and Technology. Diakses 12 Mei 2018 dari https://cris.maastrichtuniversity.nl/portal/files/1160458/ guid-9858a7e0-2f82-4655-9595-eb36c3069d84-ASSET1.0.

[21] Martikainen, M., Nikkinen, J., & V¨ahamaa, S. (2009). Production functions and productivity of family firms: Evidence from the S&P 500. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 49(2), 295-307. doi: https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2007.11.001.

[22] Morck, R., & Yeung, B. (2003). Agency problems in large family business groups. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27(4), 367-382. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111%2F1540-8520.t01- 1-00015.

[23] Palia, D., & Lichtenberg, F. (1999). Managerial ownership and firm performance: Are-examination using productivity measurement. Journal of Corporate Finance, 5(4), 323-339. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0929-1199(99)00009-7.

[24] Rutherford, M. W., Kuratko, D. F., & Holt, D. T. (2008). Examining the link between “familiness” and performance: Can the F-PEC untangle the family business theory jungle? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(6), 1089-1109. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1540-6520.2008.00275.x.

[25] Upton, N., Teal, E. J., & Felan, J. T. (2001). Strategic and business planning practices of fast growth family firms. Journal of Small Business Management, 39(1), 60-72. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/0447-2778.00006.

[26] Zahra, S. A. (2005). Entrepreneurial risk taking in family firms. Family Business Review, 18(1), 23-40. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2005.00028.x.

Download

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.