•  
  •  
 

Abstract

This paper presents spatial linkages on calculations of spill-over and feed-back effects of World input-output tables, which is aggregated specifically into six-Asian countries includes China, Indonesia, India, Japan, Korea, and Taiwan, plus Australia, United States, and the Rest of the World. The results showed that, firstly output multipliers in six Asian countries tend to increase during 2000–2014, indicating a consistent economic growth. Secondly, except China, output multipliers occurred in other countries tend to increase. Thirdly, in 2000, the United States and Japan were two countries receiving highest output spill-over. However, in year 2014, most of output spill-over moved to China. India and Indonesia received only small part of spill-over from other countries. Fourthly, the highest feed-back effect occurred in China and Japan. The smallest feed-back effect occurred in India and Indonesia. China had smallest spill-over effect but received the highest feed-back effect.

Bahasa Abstract

Artikel ini menyajikan hasil analisis keterkaitan spasial di enam negara Asia, berdasarkan perhitungan efek limpahan dan efek balik pada tabel input-output dunia, yang diagregasikan untuk enam negara Asia, yang meliputi Cina, Indonesia, India, Jepang, Korea, dan Taiwan ditambah Australia, Amerika Serikat, dan the Rest of the World. Hasil analisis memperlihatkan bahwa, pertama, pengganda output di enam negara Asia cenderung meningkat dalam waktu 2000–2014. Ini merupakan indikasi pertumbuhan ekonomi yang konsisten. Kedua, kecuali di Cina, efek limpahan juga cenderung meningkat. Ketiga, tahun 2000, negara yang paling besar menikmati limpahan adalah Amerika Serikat dan Jepang, tetapi tahun 2014, limpahan terbesar beralih ke Cina. Keempat, efek balik yang terbesar terjadi di Cina dan Jepang. Efek balik terkecil terjadi di India dan Indonesia. Cina mempunyai efek limpahan terkecil tetapi menerima efek balik terbesar.

References

[1] Andreosso-O’Callaghan, B., & Yue, G. (2004). Intersectoral linkages and key sectors in China, 1987–1997. Asian Economic Journal, 18(2): 165–183. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8381.2004.00188.x.

[2] Baldwin, R., & Lopez-Gonzalez, J. (2015). Supply-chain trade: A portrait of global patterns and several testable hypotheses. The World Economy, 38(11), 1682–1721. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.12189.

[3] Beyers, W. B. (1976). Empirical identification of key sectors: some further evidence. Environment and Planning A, 8(2), 231–236. doi: https://doi.org/10.1068%2Fa080231.

[4] Cai, J., Leung, P., Pan, M., & Pooley, S. (2005). Economic linkage impacts of Hawaii’s longline fishing regulations. Fisheries Research, 74(1–3), 232–242. doi: https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2005.02.006.

[5] Cai, J., & Leung, P. (2004). Linkage measures: A revisit and a suggested alternative. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 16(1), 63–83. doi: https: //doi.org/10.1080/0953531032000164800a.

[6] Cochrane, S. G. (1990). Input-output linkages in a frontier region of Indonesia. International Regional Science Review, 13(1–2), 183–203. doi: https: //doi.org/10.1177%2F016001769001300112.

[7] Costinot, A., & Rodr´ıguez-Clare, A. (2018). The US gains from trade: Valuation using the demand for foreign factor services. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 32(2), 3–24.

[8] Dhingra, S., Huang, H., Ottaviano,G., Pessoa, J. P., Sampson, T., & Van Reenen, J. (2017). The costs and benefits of leaving the EU: Trade e ects. CEP Discussion Paper, 1478. Centre for Economic Performance - London School of Economics and Political Science. Diakses 23 Maret 2018 dari http: //eprints.lse.ac.uk/83612/.

[9] Dietzenbacher, E. (2002). Interregional multipliers: looking backward, looking forward. Regional Studies, 36(2), 125–136. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400220121918.

[10] Dietzenbacher, E., & Van der Linden, J. A. (1997). Sectoral and spatial linkages in the EC production structure. Journal of Regional Science, 37(2), 235–257. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4146.00053.

[11] Foster-McGregor, N., Stehrer, R., & de Vries, G. J. (2013). Offshoring and the skill structure of labour demand. Review of World Economics, 149(4), 631–662. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10290-013-0163-4.

[12] Guccione, A., Gillen,W. J., Blair, P. D., & Miller, R. E. (1988). Interregional feedbacks in input-output models: The least upper bound. Journal of Regional Science, 28(3), 397–404. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9787.1988.tb01090.x.

[13] Hewings, G. J. D. (1982). The empirical identification of key sectors in an economy: a regional perspective. The Developing Economies, 20(2), 173–195. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1049.1982.tb00444.x.

[14] Hewings, G. J., Fonseca, M., Guilhoto, J., & Sonis, M. (1989). Key sectors and structural change in the Brazilian economy: a comparison of alternative approaches and their policy implications. Journal of Policy Modeling, 11(1), 67–90. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0161-8938(89)90025-2.

[15] Hoen, A. R. (2002). Identifying linkages with a cluster-based methodology. Economic Systems Research, 14(2), 131–146. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09535310220140933.

[16] ISWGNA. (2018). Handbook on supply, use and input-output tables with extensions and applications. Statistics Division - Department of Economic and Social A airs - United Nations. Diakses 22 Maret 2018 dari https://unstats.un.org/ unsd/nationalaccount/docs/SUT IOT HB wc.pdf.

[17] Johnson, R. C. (2014). Five facts about value-added exports and implications for macroeconomics and trade research. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 28(2), 119–142. doi: 10.1257/jep.28.2.119.

[18] Koopman, R.,Wang, Z., &Wei, S. J. (2014). Tracing valueadded and double counting in gross exports. American Economic Review, 104(2), 459–494.

[19] Los, B., Timmer, M. P., & de Vries, G. J. (2015). How global are global value chains? A new approach to measure international fragmentation. Journal of Regional Science, 55(1), 66–92. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/jors.12121.

[20] Midmore, P., Munday, M., & Roberts, A. (2006). Assessing industry linkages using regional input–output tables. Regional Studies, 40(3), 329–343. doi: https: //doi.org/10.1080/00343400600631673.

[21] Miller, R. E. (1966). Interregional feedback effects in input-output models: some preliminary results. Papers of the Regional Science Association, 17(1), 105–125. doi: https: //doi.org/10.1007/BF01982512.

[22] Miller, R. E. (1986). Upper bounds on the sizes of interregional feedbacks in multiregional input-output models. Journal of Regional Science, 26(2), 285–306. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9787.1986.tb00821.x.

[23] Miller, R. E., & Blair, P. D. (1990). Input-output analysis: Foundations and extensions. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.

[24] Muchdie. (2011). Spatial structure of the island economy of Indonesia: A new hybrid procedure for generation inter-regional input-output tables. Germany: Lambert Academic Publishing.

[25] Muchdie. (2017). Spatial multipliers and linkages in Indonesian economy: An inter-island input-output analysis. International Journal of Advanced Research, 5(7), 409-421. doi: 10.21474/IJAR01/4733.

[26] Muchdie, & Imansyah, M. H. (1995). Sektor-sektor unggulan dalam perekonomian Indonesia pada pembangunan jangka panjang kedua: Penerapan analisis input-output. In Marjaldi L., et al. (Eds.), Proceeding of the Indonesian Students’ First Scientific Paper Competition and Second National Seminar. Melbourne: Perhimpunan Pelajar Indonesia Australia.

[27] Muchdie, M., & Kusmawan, M. (2018). Sector-specific and spatial-specific multipliers in the USA economy: World input-output analysis. American Journal of Economics, 8(2), 83–92. doi: 10.5923/j.economics.20180802.03.

[28] Muchdie, M., & Sumarso, S. (2018). Sector-specific and spatial-specific multipliers in Japanese economy: World input-output analysis. International Journal of Development and Sustainability, 7(2), 651–665.

[29] Rashid, A. (2004). Sectoral linkages; identifying the key growth stimulating sector of the Pakistan economy. MPRA Paper No. 27210. Munich Personal RePEc Archive. Germany: Munich University Library. Diakses 21 Maret 2018 dari https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/27210/1/ MPRA paper 27210.pdf.

[30] Rueda-Cantuche, J. M., Neuwahl, F., & Delgado, L. (2012). The adjustment capacity of the European economy examined with an input-output based key sector analysis. In R. K. Benson (Ed.), Economic performance (pp. 1–44). Nova Science Publishers.

[31] Saito, M., Ruta, M., & Turunen, J. (2013). Trade interconnectedness: The world with global value chains. Policy Paper. International Monetary Fund. Diakses 26 April 2018 dari https://www.imf. org/en/Publications/Policy-Papers/Issues/2016/12/31/ Trade-Interconnectedness-The-World-with-Global-Value- Chains-PP4800.

[32] Sonis, M., Hewings, J. D., & Guo, J. (2000). A new image of classical key sector analysis: minimum information decomposition of the Leontief inverse. Economic Systems Research, 12(3), 401–423. doi: https: //doi.org/10.1080/09535310050120952.

[33] Sonis, M., Guilhoto, J. J., Hewings, G. J., & Martins, E. B. (1995). Linkages, key sectors, and structural change: some new perspectives. The Developing Economies, 33(3), 243–246. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1049.1995.tb00716.x.

[34] Timmer, M. P., Los, B., Stehrer, R., & de Vries, G. J. (2013). Fragmentation, incomes and jobs: an analysis of European competitiveness. Economic Policy, 28(76), 613–661. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0327.12018.

[35] Timmer, M. P., Los, B., Stehrer, R. & de Vries, G. J. (2016). An anatomy of the global trade slowdown based on the WIOD 2016 release. GGDC Research Memorandum, 162. Groningen Growth and Development Centre (GGDC) - University of Groningen. Diakses 26 Maret 2018 dari https://www.rug.nl/research/portal/en/publications/ an-anatomy-of-the-global-trade-slowdown-based-on-thewiod- 2016-release(579eee44-ca82-48b2-946a-cb84f363057d) .html.

[36] Timmer, M. P., Dietzenbacher, E., Los, B., Stehrer, R., & de Vries, G. J. (2015). An illustrated user guide to the world input–output database: the case of global automotive production. Review of International Economics, 23(3), 575–605. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/roie.12178.

[37] Wang, Z., Wei, S. J., & Zhu, K. (2013). Quantifying international production sharing at the bilateral and sector levels. NBER Working Paper, 19677. National Bureau of Economic Research. Diakses 26 Maret 2018 dari https://www.nber.org/papers/w19677.

[38] WIOT. (2016). World Input-Output Tables. World Input- Output Database (WIOD). Diakses 26 Maret 2018 dari http://wiod.org/database/wiots16.

Download

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.