Pendanaan dalam Pencapaian Akses Universal Air Minum di Indonesia

Authors

Ratria Anggraini Sudarsono, Program Studi Magister Perencanaan dan Kebijakan Publik Universitas IndonesiaFollow
Nurkholis Nurkholis, Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas IndonesiaFollow

Abstract

RPJMN 2015–2019 mandates universal access of drinking water in 2019. This study analyzes the policy using panel data regression. Random Effect Model (REM ) shows funding, per capita Gross Regional Domestic Product (GRDP ), and population density explain the water coverage of 23.57%, while the rest are explained by variables outside the model. Gross Regional Domestic Product (PDRB) per capita has the biggest impact on coverage, followed by Population Density. On funding, central government’s budget significantly has the highest impact, followed by local government’s budget (APBD), while others aren’t significant. Investment has positive effect, but high per capita investment may not provide high coverage. The coverage in 2019 based on unit-cost calculation is 80.21%, universal access target isn’t reached.

Bahasa Abstract

RPJMN 2015–2019 mengamanatkan pencapaian akses universal air minum tahun 2019. Penelitian ini menganalisis pencapaian kebijakan tersebut menggunakan regresi data panel. Random Effect Model (REM) menunjukkan variabel pendanaan, PDRB per kapita, dan kepadatan penduduk mampu menjelaskan variabel cakupan air minum sebesar 23,57%, sementara sisanya dijelaskan variabel di luar model. Variabel PDRB per kapita berpengaruh terbesar pada cakupan air minum, diikuti kepadatan penduduk. Untuk pendanaan, APBN signifikan memberikan pengaruh tertinggi pada cakupan air minum, diikuti APBD. Investasi berpengaruh positif, namun tingginya investasi per kapita belum tentu memberikan tambahan cakupan air minum tinggi.

References

[1] Banerjee, S., Skiling, H., Foster, V., Briceno-Garmendia, C., Morella, E., & Chfadi, T. (2008). Ebbing Water, Surging Deficits: Urban Water Supply in Sub-Saharan Africa [Africa Infrastructure Country Diagnostic]. Background Paper, 12. Washington, DC: The World Bank. Diakses 23 Oktober 2017 dari https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/ 7835.

[2] Banerji, B. (2013). Institutional analysis of municipal water reforms: Framework and application to Jakarta, Indonesia. Dissertation. The George Washington University.

[3] BPPSPAM. (2015). Buku kinerja PDAM tahun 2015. Jakarta: Badan Peningkatan Penyelenggaraan Sistem Penyediaan Air Minum.

[4] BPS. (2017). Persentase rumah tangga menurut provinsi dan sumber air minum layak, 1993-2016. Badan Pusat Statistik.

[5] Indonesia, R. (2009a). Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 29 Tahun 2009 Tentang Pemberian Jaminan dan Subsidi Bunga oleh Pemerintah Pusat dalam Rangka Percepatan Penyediaan Air Minum.

[6] Indonesia, R. (2009b). Peraturan Menteri Pekerjaan Umum Nomor: 21/PRT/M/2009 tentang Pedoman Teknis Kelayanan Investasi Pengembangan Sistem Penyediaan Air Minum oleh Perusahaan Daerah Air Minum (PDAM).

[7] Indonesia, R. (2014). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 23 Tahun 2014 Tentang Pemerintahan Daerah.

[8] Indonesia, R. (2015a). Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 122 Tahun 2015 Tentang Sistem Penyediaan Air Minum.

[9] Indonesia, R. (2015b). Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 2 Tahun 2015 tentang Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Menengah Nasional (RPJMN) 2015-2019.

[10] Indonesia, R. (2015c). Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 38 Tahun 2015 Tentang Kerjasama Pemerintah dengan Badan Usaha dalam Penyediaan Infrastruktur.

[11] Johns Hopkins University. Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health and the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies. (2008). The Johns Hopkins and Red Cross Red Crescent Public health guide in emergencies (2nd edition). Diakses 23 Oktober 2017 dari https://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/ Forward.pdf.

[12] Mankiw, N. G. (2006). Macroeconomics (8th edition). USA: Harvard University.

[13] Marson, M., & Savin, I. (2015). Ensuring sustainable access to drinking water in Sub Saharan Africa: Conflict between financial and social objectives. World Development, 76, 26–39. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.06.002.

[14] Owolabi, F. N. (2005). Impacts of water supply utility privatization on urban households and the environment in Benin. Thesis. State University of New York.

[15] Sambu, D. (2011). Water reforms in Kenya: A historical challenge to ensure universal water access and meet the Millennium Development Goals. Dissertation. Graduate College, University of Oklahoma.

[16] UNSD. (2017). SDG Indicators: Metadata repository. United Nations Statistics Division. Diakses 23 Oktober 2017 dari https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/metadata.

[17] van Ginneken, M., Netterstrom, U., & Bennett, A. (2011). More, better, or different spending? Trends in public expenditure on water and sanitation in Sub-Saharan Africa. Water Papers, 67321-AFR. Washington, DC: Water Unit, Transport, Water and ICT Department, Sustainable Development Vice Presidency - The World Bank. Diakses 23 Oktober 2017 dari http://documents. worldbank.org/curated/en/998971468004159245/ More-better-or-different-spending-Trends-in-publicexpenditure- on-water-and-sanitation-in-Sub-Saharan- Africa.

Recommended Citation

Sudarsono, Ratria Anggraini and Nurkholis, Nurkholis (2020) "Pendanaan dalam Pencapaian Akses Universal Air Minum di Indonesia," Jurnal Ekonomi dan Pembangunan Indonesia: Vol. 20: No. 1, Article 1.
DOI: 10.21002/jepi.2020.01
Available at: https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/jepi/vol20/iss1/1