Abstract
Currently, animal protein consumption in Indonesia is still low. The consumption of animal protein is one of the keys to improving public health. This study aims to analyze the consumption of animal protein shown by consumption of meat, chicken, fish and milk commodities in households in Indonesia. Fifth Indonesia Family Life Survey (IFLS) data applied by model of Almost Ideal Demand System (AIDS). The results found that the own-price elasticity has a negative sign in accordance with the law of demand. Cross-price elasticity values vary from one another. Expenditure elasticity has positive sign indicates that all commodities are normal goods.
Bahasa Abstract
Saat ini konsumsi protein hewani di Indonesia masih relatif rendah. Padahal konsumsi protein hewani menjadi salah satu kunci untuk meningkatkan kesehatan masyarakat. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis konsumsi protein hewani yang ditunjukkan oleh konsumsi komoditas daging, daging ayam, ikan-ikanan, dan susu pada rumah tangga Indonesia. Penelitian ini menggunakan data Indonesian Family Life Survey (IFLS) 5 yang diaplikasikan dengan model Almost Ideal Demand System (AIDS). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa koefisien elastisitas harga sendiri memiliki tanda negatif sesuai dengan hukum permintaan. Nilai elastisitas harga silang bervariasi satu sama lain. Elastisitas pengeluaran bertanda positif menunjukkan bahwa seluruh komoditas merupakan barang normal.
References
[1] Adekunmi, A. O., Ayinde, J. O., & Ajala, A. O. (2017). An assessment of protein consumption patterns among rural dwellers in Osun State, Nigeria. Ife Journal Agriculture, 29(1), 84–94.
[2] Alexandri, C., Pauna, B., & Luca, L. (2015). An estimation of food demand system in Romania – Implications for population’s food security. Procedia Economics and Finance, 22, 577–586. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00263-4
[3] Budiwinarto, K. (2011). Penerapan model Almost Ideal Demand System ( AIDS ) pada pola konsumsi pangan rumah tangga nelayan di Kecamatan Tambak Kabupaten Banyumas. Smooting, 6(1), 27–39. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.2311/.v6i1.877.
[4] Deaton, A.,&Muellbauer, J. (1980).Analmost ideal demand system. The American Economic Review, 70(3), 312–326.
[5] Farooq, U., Young, T., & Iqbal, M. (1999). An investigation into the farm households consumption patterns in Punjab, Pakistan. The Pakistan Development Review, 38(3), 293–305.
[6] Fujii, E. T., Khaled, M., & Mak, J. (1985). An almost ideal demand system for visitor expenditures. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 19(2), 161–171.
[7] Okrent, A. M., & Alston, J. M. (2011). Demand for food in the United States: A review of literature, evaluation of previous estimates, and presentation of new estimates of demand. Giannini Foundation Monograph, 48. Giannini Foundation of Agriculutural Economics, University of California. Diakses 13 Maret 2018 dari https://s.giannini.ucop.edu/uploads/giannini public/ 54/99/54994570-7739-4f54-99d7-91dd4aca3762/ 48-fooddemand.pdf.
[8] Sekretariat Ditjen PKH. (2017). Konsumsi Periode Tahun 2016. Newsletter Data Makro Edisi: 01/konsumsi/03/2017. Sekretariat Ditjen PKH, Bagian Evaluasi dan Layanan Rekomendasi. Direktorat Jenderal Peternakan dan Kesehatan Hewan, Kementerian Pertanian. Diakses 26 Maret 2018 dari http://ditjenpkh.pertanian.go.id/userfiles/File/ Konsumsi1 Periode 2016.pdf?time=1501058657531.
[9] Setiawan, N. (2006). Perkembangan konsumsi protein hewani di Indonesia: Analisis hasil Survey Sosial Ekonomi Nasional 2002-2005. Jurnal Ilmu Ternak, 6(1), 68–74. doi:https://doi.org/10.24198/jit.v6i1.2270.
[10] Varian, H. R. (2010). Intermediate microeconomics: A modern approach [8th Ed.]. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
[11] Wahyuni, D., Purnastuti, L., & Mustofa. (2016). Analisis elastisitas tiga bahan pangan sumber protein hewani di Indonesia. Jurnal Economia, 12(1), 43–53. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/economia.v12i1.9544.
Recommended Citation
Umaroh, Rodhiah and Vinantia, Anggita
(2018)
"Analisis Konsumsi Protein Hewani pada Rumah Tangga Indonesia,"
Jurnal Ekonomi dan Pembangunan Indonesia: Vol. 18:
No.
3, Article 2.
DOI: 10.21002/jepi.2018.13
Available at:
https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/jepi/vol18/iss3/2