Pengaruh Ketidakmayoritasan Partai Politik Kepala Daerah di DPRD (Divided Government) terhadap Keterlambatan Penetapan APBD

Authors

Sigit Wahyu Kartiko, Direktorat Jenderal Perimbangan Keuangan, Kementerian Keuangan Republik IndonesiaFollow

Abstract

Why is APBD (Regional Budget) often enacted after the budgeted financial year has started? Is it because of political factor? The research would like to highlight the economic and political perspectives of divided government as one of the factors of the bad performance of the Regional Budget (APBD) enactment. By using logit regression equation model, a result obtained shows that government formations from Legislative General Elections 2004 and Direct Local Elections of the years 2005, 2006, and 2007, such as single minority party, minority coalition, majority coalition, and single majority party, influence the regional late budget of the year 2008-2009.

Bahasa Abstract

Mengapa Anggaran Pendapatan dan Belanja Daerah (APBD) sering ditetapkan setelah awal tahun anggaran yang baru? Apakah karena faktor politis? Studi ini ingin mengetengahkan perspektif ekonomi politik divided government sebagai salah satu faktor penyebab buruknya kinerja penetapan APBD. Dengan menggunakan model persamaan regresi logit diperoleh hasil bahwa formasi pemerintahan dari Pemilu Legislatif 2004 dan Pemilihan Kepala Daerah langsung tahun 2005, 2006, serta 2007 berupa single minority party, minority coalition, majority coalition, dan single majority party memengaruhi keterlambatan penetapan APBD sepanjang tahun 2008-2009.

References

[1] Andersen, A. L., Lassen, D.D., & Nielsen, L. H. W. (2010). Late Budgets. EPRU Working Paper Series, 2010-04. www.econ.ku.dk/eprn_epru/ Workings_Papers/wp-10-04.pdf (Accessed April 25, 2011).

[2] Bakry, L. (2009). Menelusuri Faktor-Faktor Penyebab Keterlambatan Penetapan Anggaran Pendapatan dan Belanja Daerah (APBD) Kabupaten/Kota. Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan 30, 94-104.

[3] Barczak, M. (2001). Squaring Off: Executive and Legislatures in Equador. In Elgie, Robert (Ed.). Divided Government in Comparative Perspective, pp. 41-62. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

[4] Buchanan, J. M. & Tullock, G. (1962). The Calculus of Consent: Logical Foundations of Constitutional Democrazy. Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan Press.

[5] Cummins, J. (2010). Applying Method to the Madness: An Empirical Analysis of California Bud- get Delays. Western Political Science Association 2010 Annual Meeting Paper. California: Department of Political Science. California State University, Fresno.

[6] Chen, D. & Huang, T. (1999). Divided Government: A New Approach to Taiwan's Local Politics. Issues & Studies, 35 (1), 1-35.

[7] Elgie, R. (2001). Divided Government in Comparative Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

[8] Eriyanto. (2007, November). Pilkada dan Terbaginya Kendali Partai pada Pemerintahan (Divided Government). Kajian Bulanan, 07. Lingkaran Survei Indonesia.

[9] Ferejohn, J. & Krehbiel, K. (1987). The Budget Process and the Size of the Budget. American Journal of Political Science, 31 (2), 296-320.

[10] Fiorina, M. P. (1992). An Era of Divided Government. Political Science Quarterly, 107 (3), 387-410.

[11] Indonesia, R. (2004). Undang-Undang Nomor 33 Tahun 2004 tentang Perimbangan Keuangan antara Pemerintah Pusat dan Daerah.

[12] Indonesia, R. (2009). Undang-Undang Nomor 27 Tahun 2009 tentang Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat, Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat, Dewan Perwakilan Daerah, dan Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Daerah.

[13] Indonesia, R. (2005). Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 55 Tahun 2005 tentang Dana Perimbangan.

[14] Indonesia, R. (2005). Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 56 Tahun 2005 tentang Sistem Informasi Keuangan Daerah.

[15] Indonesia, R. (2006). Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 58 Tahun 2006 tentang Pengelolaan Keuangan Daerah.

[16] Indonesia, R. (2006). Peraturan Menteri Keuangan (PMK) Nomor 46 Tahun 2006 tentang Tata Cara Penyampaian Informasi Keuangan Daerah.

[17] Indonesia, R. (2006). Permendagri Nomor 13 Tahun 2006 tentang Pedoman Pengelolaan Keuangan Daerah (Pedoman PKD).

[18] Indonesia, R. (2008). PMK 04/PMK.07/2008 disempurnakan menjadi PMK 21/PMK.07/2009 tentang Pelaksanaan Pertanggungjawaban Anggaran Transfer ke Daerah.

[19] Indonesia, R. (2010). Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 16 Tahun 2010 tentang Pedoman Penyusunan Peraturan Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Daerah tentang Tata Tertib Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Daerah.

[20] Klarner, C. E., Phillips, J. H., & Muckler, M. (2010). The Causes of Fiscal Stalemate. SSRN Working Paper. http://www.columbia.edu/ ~jhp2121/workingpapers/FiscalStalemate.pdf (Accessed April 25, 2011).

[21] Klesner, J. L. (2001). Divided Government in Me- xico's Presidentialist Regime: the 1997-2000 Experience. In Elgie, R. (Ed.). Divided Government in Comparative Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

[22] Lassen, D. D. & Andersen, A. L. (2010). Fiscal Governance and Electoral Accountability: Evidence from Late Budgets. APSA 2010 Annual Meeting Paper. Washington, DC: American Political Science Association.

[23] Laver, M. & Shepsle, K. A. (1991). Divided Government: America is Not "Exceptional". Governance, 4 (3), 250-269.

[24] Meyers, R. T. (1997). Late Appropriations and Government Shutdowns: Frequency, Causes, Consensus, and Remedies. Public Budgeting and Finance, 17, 25-38.

[25] Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

[26] Shugart, M. S. (1995, June). The Electoral Cycle and Institutional Sources of Divided Presidential Government. American Political Science Review, 89 (2), 327-343.

[27] Solthan, A. (2009, Desember). Dinamika Politik Lokal dalam Kebijakan Penyusunan APBD: Studi Kasus Kabupaten Bulukumba, Sulawesi Selatan. Analisis CSIS, 38 (4).

[28] Wangi, C. A. P. & Ritonga, I. T. (2010). Identifikasi Faktor-Faktor Penyebab Terjadinya Keterlambatan dalam Penyusunan APBD (Studi Kasus Kabupaten Rejang Lebong Tahun Anggaran 20082010). Makalah Simposium Nasional Akuntansi XIII Purwokerto 2010. http://blog.umy. ac.id/ervin/files/2012/05/ASP_22.pdf (Accessed April 25, 2011).

[29] Wu, C. & Huang, C. (2005). Divided Government in Taiwan's Local Politics: Public Evaluations of City/County Government Performance. Party Politics, 13 (6), 741-760. http://ppq.sagepub.com/ content/13/6/741.full.pdf+html (Accessed April 25, 2011).

Recommended Citation

Kartiko, Sigit Wahyu (2012) "Pengaruh Ketidakmayoritasan Partai Politik Kepala Daerah di DPRD (Divided Government) terhadap Keterlambatan Penetapan APBD," Jurnal Ekonomi dan Pembangunan Indonesia: Vol. 12: No. 2, Article 1.
DOI: 10.21002/jepi.v12i2.01
Available at: https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/jepi/vol12/iss2/1