•  
  •  
 

Abstract

Using Logistic Regression and Hedonic Price Model, this study aims to find the social-economic factors influencing the demand and willingness to pay (WTP) for clean water supply and proper sanitation. This study find that education and age of household head are the affecting factors. Also, it found that per capita expenditure affects the availability of access for sanitation and clean water for all household group. WTP for clean water and sanitation in urban is greater than in rural. In additions, WTP of non poor households are greater than poor household, except for urban area.

Bahasa Abstract

Dengan menggunakan Model Regresi Logistic dan Model Harga Hedonik, studi ini bertujuan untuk melihat faktor sosial ekonomi yang memengaruhi permintaan dan daya beli (willingness to pay/WTP) terhadap air bersih dan sanitasi. Studi ini menemukan faktor pendidikan dan usia kepala rumah tangga, serta pengeluaran per kapita memengaruhi ketersediaan akses sanitasi dan air bersih di seluruh kelompok rumah tangga. WTP untuk air bersih dan sanitasi di perkotaan secara umum lebih besar daripada perdesaan. Sementara itu, WTP untuk rumah tangga tidak miskin secara umum lebih tinggi dari rumah tangga miskin, kecuali untuk air bersih di perkotaan.

References

[1] Arimah, B.C. (1992). Hedonic Price and Demand for Housing Attributes in a Third World City: The Case of Ibadan, Nigeria. Urban Studies, June, 29, 639-651.

[2] Bappenas (2003). Kebijakan Nasional Pembangunan Air Minum dan Penyehatan Lingkungan Berbasis Masyarakat Tahun 2003. Jakarta: Proyek Penyusunan Kebijakan dan Rencana Kegiatan Air Bersih dan Penyehatan Lingkungan (WASPOLA).

[3] Badan Pusat Statistik. (2008). Survei Sosial Ekonomi Nasional. Jakarta: BPS.

[4] Brasington, D.M. & Hite, D. (2005). Demand for Environmental Quality: A Spatial Hedonic Analysis. Regional Science and Urban Economics 35, January, (1), 57-82.

[5] Fauzi, A. (2004). Ekonomi Sumber Daya Alam dan Lingkungan. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

[6] Freeman, M.A. (1993). The Measurement of Environmental and Resources Values: Theory and Methods. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.

[7] Fujita, M. (1989). Urban Economic Theory: Land Use and City Size. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[8] Gujarati, D.N. (2003). Basic Econometrics, 4th Edition. New York: McGraw Hill.

[9] Harahap, B.N. & Hartono, D. (2007). Analysis of Willingness to Pay and Determinant of Drinking Water and Sanitation Availability in Indonesia Using Hedonic Price Model Approach and Logistic Model. Working Paper in Economics and Development Studies No. 200712. Style Sheet.http:// www.equitablepolicy.org/wpaper/200712.pdf. (10 Oktober 2010).

[10] Hutton, G. & Haller, L. (2004). Evaluation of the Costs and Benefits of Water and Sanitation Improvements at the Global Level. Geneva: World Health Organization.

[11] James, D. (1994). The Application of Economic Techniques in Environmental Impact Assessment. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

[12] Malpezzi, S. (2002). Hedonic Pricing Models: A Selective and Applied Review. Prepared for: Housing Economics : Essays in Honor of Duncan Maclennan, Edited by Tony O'Sullivan and Kenneth Gibb. Oxford: Blackwell Science. Style Sheet. http://www.bus.wisc.edu/realestate/ documents/Hedonic%20Pricing%20Models% 20Survey%20for%20Maclennan.pdf. (7 Juli 2010).

[13] Metalia, M. (2004). Mengestimasi Willingness to Pay Pelanggan Rumah Tangga untuk Pelayanan Air Bersih dari PDAM: Aplikasi Survei Contingent Valuation di Kota Bandar Lampung Tahun 2000. Depok: Tesis Magister Ilmu Ekonomi Program Pascasarjana Fakultas Ekonomi UI.

[14] Montgomery, M.A. & Elimelech, M. (2007). Water and Sanitation in Developing Countries: Including Health in the Equation. Environmental Science & Technology, January, 41, (1), 17-24.

[15] Muylwijk, J. & Gender and Water Alliance. (2006).A Gender Approach to Sanitation, for Empowerment of Women, Men and Children. Paper presented at SACOSAN II 2005, September 2006. /http://www.genderandwater. org/content/download/6661/46614/file/ GenderSanitationMuylwijk.doc. (10 Oktober 2010).

[16] PBB & Bappenas. (2007). Laporan Pencapaian Millenium Development Goals Indonesia 2007. Jakarta: Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional.

[17] Republika Online. (2008). Hari Cuci Tangan Dirayakan di Seluruh Dunia. www.republika.co.id/berita/gaya-hidup/ info-sehat/08/10/16/7822-hari-cuci-tangan\ indent-dirayakan-di-seluruh-dunia. (10 Oktober 2010).

[18] UNICEF. (2008). International Year of Sanitation Highlights the Critical Issue of Access to Safe Water and Adequate Sanitation. Media Release. Style Sheet.http://www.unicef.org/ indonesia/IYS_Launch_Final__English_.pdf. (7 Juli 2010).

[19] WHO. (2004). Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene Development. www.who.int/water_ sanitation_health/hygiene/en/.

[20] World Bank. (2006). Indonesia: Enabling Water Utilities to Serve the Urban Poor. Style Sheet. http://www.waterlinks.org/ sites/default/files/World%20Bank%20\ discretionary{-}{}{}%20Enabling%20Water% 20Utilities%20to%20Serve%20the%20Urban% 20Poor%20%282006%29.pdf. (7 Juli 2010).

[21] Yusuf, A.A. & Koundouri, P. (2005). Willingness to Pay for Water and Location Bias in Hedonic Price Analysis: Evidence from the Indonesia Housing Market. Environment and Development Economics, 10, (6), December, 821-836. Style Sheet. http://journals.cambridge.org/abstract_ S1355770X05002548. (30 April 2011).

Download

Included in

Economics Commons

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.