Abstract
This study explicitly aims to determaine the influence os taset, texture, and visual aspects on consumer Willingness to Buy (WTB) the Ayam Geprek Rempah product. Using a quantitative approach, the research involved 25 respondents who met the criteria, namely having a habit of purchasing food priced between IDR 25,000 and IDR 35,000, ordering food online at least twice a week, having a preference for ayam geprek, and havingtried the Ayam Geprek Rempah product. The data used was secondary data, and the analysis was conducted using the non-parametric statistical test, the Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks Test. The results showed that the taste variable had a Z value of −2.043 with a p-value of 0.041, the texture variable had a Z value of −2.474 with a p-value of 0.013, and the visual variable had a Z value of −2.471 with a p-value of 0.013. These findings indicate that the taste, texture, and visual appeal of Ayam Geprek Rempah significantly influence Willingness to Buy.
Bahasa Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh rasa, tekstur, dan visual terhadap Willingness to Buy (WTB) dalam pengembangan produk Ayam Geprek Rempah. Menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif, penelitian ini melibatkan 25 responden yang memenuhi kriteria, yakni kebiasaan membeli makanan seharga Rp25.000–Rp35.000, memesan makanan secara online minimal dua kali seminggu, memiliki preferensi suka terhadap ayam geprek, serta telah mencoba produk Ayam Geprek Rempah. Data yang digunakan merupakan data sekunder, dan analisis dilakukan menggunakan uji statistik non-parametrik Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks Test. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa variabel rasa memiliki nilai Z = −2,043 dengan p = 0,041, Sedangkan pada variabel tekstur, nilai Z = −2,474 dan p = 0,013, serta pada variabel visual, nilai Z = −2,471 dan p = 0,013. Temuan ini mengindikasikan bahwa rasa, tekstur, dan visual Ayam Geprek Rempah berpengaruh signifikan terhadap Willingness to Buy.
References
Agmasari, S., & Asdhiana, M. (2018, April 27). Apa Bedanya Ayam Geprek dan
Ayam Penyet? Retrieved from Kompas.com:
https://travel.kompas.com/read/2018/04/27/090700527/apa-bedanya-
ayam-geprek-dan-ayam-penyet-?lgn_method=google&google_btn=onetap
Albar, S. A., Zhang, H., Zulyniak, M. A., Evans, C. E., Bawajeeh, A. O., & Cade,
J. E. (2020). Impact of Taste on Food Choices in Adolescence—
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Nutrients 2020.
Andrianto, F. (n.d.). The Influence Of Taste and Product Quality to Purchasing.
Journal of World Conference.
Azman, N. I., Salehudin, M., Zahari, M., Hanafiah, M. H., & Ferdian, F. (2022).
Ramadhan street food bazaar shopping: investigating the effect of
Malaysian Muslim consumer’s visual sensory cues on purchase behaviour
and satisfaction. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 260-278.
Bougie, R., & Sekaran, U. (2019). Research Methods For Business: A Skill
Building Approach. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons. .
Choi, N. E., & Han, J. H. (2015). How Flavor Works: The Science of Taste and
Aroma. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
Choudhary, N. (2019). Strategic Analysis of Cloud Kitchen – A Case Study. An
International Journal of Management Studies, 186-190.
Fridayani, H. D., Iqbal, M., & Atmojo, M. E. (2021). Cloud Kitchen: Strategy for
Indonesian Culinary Business (SMEs). Management Research and
Behavior Journal, 41-46.
Fuller, G. W. (2011). New Food Product Development. Boca Raton: Taylor & Francis Group.
Funami, T., & Naukama, M. (2022). Instrumental food texture evaluation in
relation to human perception. Food Hydrocolloids.
Gurning, K., Iksen, Simanjunta, H. E., & Purba, H. (2020). Identification of the
Chemical Compound of Essential Oil from. A Multifaceted Journal in the
field of Natural Products and Pharmacognosy.
GUZIK, A. (2023). Overview of new product development strategies and models.
21-34.
Jeong, M., Choi, H., & Lee, J. (2020). The role of food presentation in consumer
decision-making. Food Quality and Preference, 79.
Kaavya, K., & Andal, V. (2022). CLOUD KITCHEN – A OVERVIEW.
Scholarly Journal, 50-53.
KHUSNA, L. (2017). GAMBARAN RASA, WARNA, TEKSTUR, VARIASI
MAKANAN DAN.
Kim, Y., Park, J., & Choi, J. (2022). The effect of food packaging and color on
consumer purchasing decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 511-527.
Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2012). Marketing Management.17
Rahmad, A., Zulkipli, & Zulfachmi. (2024). Alasan Peneliti Menggunakan
Analisis Statistik Wilcoxon. 119-125.
Samuel, P., Pohjanheimo, T., Uutela, A. L., Křečková , Z., & Otterbring , T.
(2018). The effects of consumer knowledge on the willingness to buy
insect food: An exploratory cross-regional study in Northern and Central
Europe. Food Quality and Preference, 1-10.
Shaikh, F. H., Shumway, K. R., & Soni, A. (2024). Physiology, Taste.
Simamora, N. S. (2020, February 11). Wow! Penjualan Ayam Geprek Tembus 300
Juta Porsi. Retrieved from Bisnis.com:
https://entrepreneur.bisnis.com/read/20200211/263/1199952/wow-
penjualan-ayam-geprek-tembus-300-juta-porsi
Swiader, K., & Marczewska , M. (2021). Trends of Using Sensory Evaluation in
New Product Development in the Food Industry in Countries that Belong
to the EIT Regional Innovation Scheme. Scholarly Journal.
Wong, S.-L., Su, C. C., & Chen, H. S. (2018). To Buy or Not to Buy? Consumer
Attitudes and Purchase Intentions for Suboptimal Food. Journal Environ.
Res. Public Health.
Yoon, S., Lee, H., & Kim, J. (2019). The impact of food color on consumer
perception and purchase intention. Journal of Business Research, 215-221.
Recommended Citation
Irwandini, Diandra Srivania and Asyari, Hasyim
(2025)
"Pengaruh Rasa, Tekstur, Dan Visual Terhadap Willingness To Buy Produk Ayam Geprek Rempah,"
Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis Terapan: Vol. 7:
Iss.
2, Article 4.
DOI: 10.7454/jabt.v7i2.1123
Available at:
https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/jabt/vol7/iss2/4


