•  
  •  
 

Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis Terapan (JABT)

Abstract

Along with the industrial revolution 4.0, the rapid development of information and communication technology (ICT) has changed organizations and individuals in carrying out daily activities. In the world of education, the increasingly sophisticated capabilities of mobile phones and portable computers are one of the factors that influence the development of online learning (e-learning). However, digital literacy is still needed to improve understanding and skills in the development of online learning (e-learning). This study propose a digital literacy workshop design to improve the quality of human resources; and evaluate the performance of the digital literacy workshop using the Importance Performance Analysis (IPA) matrix. The data collection process was carried out in two stages. The first stage is to design workshop activities and the second stage is to evaluate the quality of the workshop program. Based on data analysis, it was found that socialization and workshops were the right solution to improve the competence of teachers and students of SMAN 39 in carrying out learning innovations by utilizing information technology. In general, the level of satisfaction obtained by the workshop participants has met the level of expectations and nothing is excessive. However, there is one item no 5 (Active involvement in the program) which is a top priority for improvement. Because it has a high level of hope, but the level of perceived satisfaction is still relatively low.

References

Abdelrahim, R., Khalil Elfaki, N., Abdulraheem, I., & Abdulrahim, M. R. (1994). Impact of elearning vs traditional learning on students’ performance and attitude. Article in International Medical Journal, 24(03), 225– 233. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/3444 60679 Bothe, K. (1996). Beyond Customer Satisfaction to Customer Loyalty. American Marketing Association, 1996. Hana, H. M., Chan, A., Barkah, C. S., & Tresna, P. W. (2022). Customer Satisfaction Analysis Through Service Quality for Service Strategy Improvement Mutiareads. Management Analysis Journal, 11(1), 39–45. https://doi.org/10.15294/maj.v11i1.52694 Hidayatullah, S. (2022). Active Learning as A Teaching Method : A Discourse for Its Implementation in Islamic Education. 313– 320. John, K. J. (2022). Learning Management System and Its Role in the Effective Delivery of Medical Education. August, 6–7. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.14055.10. Kasim, N. N. M., & Khalid, F. (2016). Choosing the right learning management system (LMS) for the higher education institution context: A systematic review. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 11(6), 55–61. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v11i06.5644 Lerbin & Aritonang. (2005). Kepuasan Pelanggan Pengukuran dan Pengendalian dengan SPSS. Gramedia Jakarta, 1–153. Martínez-Caro, E., Cegarra-Navarro, J. G., & Cepeda-Carrión, G. (2015). An application of the performance-evaluation model for elearning quality in higher education. Total Quality Management and Business Excellence, 26(5–6), 632–647. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2013.86760 7 Nur Hadi Waryanto, N. I. (2013). Tingkat Kesiapan ( Readiness ) Implementasi E-Learning Di Sekolah Menengah Atas Kota Yogyakarta the Readiness Level of Implementing E-Learning in Yogyakarta High. 117–124. Oebaidillah, S. (2018). Hadapi Revolusi Industri 4.0, Guru Harus Melek Literasi Digital. PT CITRA MEDIANUSA PURNAMA. https://mediaindonesia.com/humaniora/19018 0/hadapi-revolusi-industri-40-guru-harusmelek-literasi-digital Rahardja, U., Aini, Q., & Zuliana, S. R. (2016). Metode Learning Management System (LMS) Idu Untuk Mendukung Kegiatan Belajar Mengajar MIT Pada Perguruan Tinggi Raharja. Cices, 2(2), 156–172. https://doi.org/10.33050/cices.v2i2.311 Riyana, C. (2015). Konsep Pembelajaran Online. Modul Pembelajaran Universitas Terbuka Tangerang Selatan, 1–43. Sa’adah, I., Mukson, M., & Ondho, Y. S. (2019). Pengukuran Tingkat Kepuasan Peternak dalam Pelayanan Inseminasi Buatan Menggunakan Analisis Customer Satisfaction Index (CSI) dan Importance Performance Analysis (IPA). Jurnal Ekonomi Pertanian Dan Agribisnis, 3(3), 557–567. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jepa.2019.003.03. 11 Selim, H. M. (2007). Critical success factors for elearning acceptance: Confirmatory factor models. Computers and Education, 49(2), 396– 413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.09.00 4 Turnbull, D., Chugh, R., & Luck, J. (2020). Encyclopedia of Education and Information Technologies. Encyclopedia of Education and Information Technologies, August, 0–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60013-0 Zhang, W., & Cheng, Y. L. (2020). International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning Quality Assurance in E-Learning : PDPP Evaluation Model and its Application Quality Assurance in E-Learning : PDPP Evaluation Model and its Application. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 2012(1), 1–18.

Download

Share

COinS