Abstract
Digital transformation in every public sector (E-government) already happened this past year. Though, from many IT Projects that previously ran, in average only 15% projects that can be said succeed. Many projects that failed caused by bad strategic and planning, bad management of human resources, lack of technological preparation, lousy implementation without proper preparation and proper acceptance testing. IT Projects are very costly, so we need to handle those problems with appropriate project management. One of the best ways to realize appropriate project management is using a project management system that can utilize proper knowledge management as well. Using post-positivism and analyzing the primary data from samples with SEM-PLS, researcher try to research which factors in good knowledge management aspects that can be used in a good project management system to satisfy user needs and make the best benefit for all. For the result, the researcher can know that 1) Quality of System, 2) Quality of Content, 3) Quality of Context and Relation, and 4) Sustainability of System, can improve the User Satisfaction factor which indirectly can increase the Benefit factor gained for all. After this result out, the researcher found Phabricator as the best Project Management System that can comply with all the elements above.
References
Alawneh, A. A., & Aouf, R. (2016). A Proposed Knowledge Management Framework for Boosting the Success of Information Systems Projects. 2016 International Conference on Engineering & MIS (ICEMIS) (pp. 1-5). Morocco: IEEE Xplorer. Attlassian. (2013). JIRA Documentation. Retrieved from JIRA: http://downloads.atlassian.com/software/jira/dow nloads/documentation/JIRA061_Documentation _PDF-121013-2021-40.pdf Green, G., & Liu L., Q. B. (2009). Knowledge-based Management Information Systems for the Effective Business Performance of SMEs. Journal of International Technology and Information Management Vol. 18 Ed.2, 201-222. Hair, J., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a Silver Bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice (JMTP) Vol. 19, Ed. 2, 139- 152. Hartono, B., Ramadhani, V. S., Ratnadilla, Y., Indarti, N., & Chai, K. H. (2015). Knowledge Management Maturity and Organizational Performance in Project-Based Organizations: Initial Evidence from Indonesia. 2015 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM) (pp. 656-660). Singapore: IEEE Xplorer. Liu, H., & Liu, Z. (2009). Conceptual Framework and Key Issues of Project Management based on Knowledge Management. 2009 International Conference on Management and Service Science (pp. 1-5). Wuhan: Crown. Ong, C.-S., & Lai, J.-Y. (2007). Measuring User Satisfaction with Knowledge Management Systems: Scale Development, Purification, and Initial Test. Computers in Human Behavior Vol. 23, Ed. 3, 1329-1346. Stacey, R. D. (2001). Complex Responsive Processes in Organizations - Learning and Knowledge Creation. London: Routledge: The Taylor & Francis Group. Wang, Y., & Liao, Y. (2008). Assessing eGovernment Systems Success: A validation of the DeLone and McLean model of information systems success. Government Information Quarterly Vol. 25, Ed. 4, 717-733. Wu, J., & Wang, Y. (2006). Measuring KMS Success: A Respecification of the DeLone and McLean's Model. Information & Management Vol. 43, Ed. 6, 728-739.
Recommended Citation
Anza, Fikri Akbarsyah
(2019)
"Key Factors in Implementing Knowledge Management System based on Project Management (Case Study Pusilkom UI),"
Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis Terapan: Vol. 1:
Iss.
2, Article 5.
DOI: 10.7454/jabt.v1i2.17
Available at:
https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/jabt/vol1/iss2/5
Included in
Accounting Commons, Business Administration, Management, and Operations Commons, Economic Theory Commons, Human Resources Management Commons