•  
  •  
 

Abstract

The lifetime of electronic devices strongly depends on the junction temperature. Heat sinks are a good choice for dissipating heat because of their enhanced heat transfer areas. Plate–fin heat sinks are commonly used for electronic components because of their simple construction. Recently, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) software, such as Ansys Fluent and OpenFOAM, has been widely used and has provided effective results. Autodesk CFD is a powerful simulation tool; however, its use in heat sink research remains relatively uncommon. In this study, two plate–fin heat sinks with heights of 30 and 50 mm were first designed using heat transfer equations and then compared with Autodesk CFD simulations under natural convection conditions. Temperature inputs of 60 °C, 70 °C, and 80 °C were assigned to determine the temperature distribution along the fins, heat dissipation, fin efficiency, and fin effectiveness for both types of heat sinks. The results of the heat transfer calculations and Autodesk CFD simulations are consistent, with negligible differences. These findings indicate that Autodesk CFD can produce reliable results for heat sink design. In addition, efficiency decreases with the increase in fin height, although the effectiveness and heat dissipation of the tall (50 mm) heat sink are higher than those of the short (30 mm) heat sink. Although the 50-mm-high fin heat sink has a heat transfer area approximately 63% larger than that of the 30-mm-high fin heat sink, its heat dissipation is only approximately 40% larger than that of the 30-mm-high fin heat sink. This finding indicates that the addition of more material alone may not proportionally increase heat transfer and could lead to wasted material. Therefore, when designing heat sinks, the height of the fins should be carefully considered and optimized to enhance efficiency and conserve materials.

References

  1. Y.A. Çengel, Heat Transfer: A Practical Approach, 2nd ed., Mcgraw-Hill, US, 2002.
  2. Y. Chung, K. Luo, J. Heat Transf. 124/6 (2002) 1039.
  3. A. Mostafa, A. Khalid, E. Mohamed, A. Hany, A. Salem, Therm. Sci. 25/6B (2021) 4683.
  4. S. Alagesan, D. Senthilkumar, R. Mohan, Therm. Sci. 24/1B (2020) 437.
  5. D. Jeon, C. Byon, Int. J. Heat Mass Tran. 113 (2017) 1086.
  6. S.S. Haghighi, H.R. Goshayeshi, M.R. Safaei, Int. J. Heat Mass Tran. 125 (2018) 640.
  7. H. Sivasankaran, G. Asirvatham, J. Bose, B. Albert, Therm. Sci. 14/1 (2010) 147.
  8. N. Lakshminarasimha, M.S. Rajagopal, J. Eng. Res. Appl. 2 (2018) 26.
  9. W.N. Kim, S.Y. Kim, B.H. Kang, The Ninth Intersociety Conference on Thermal and Thermo mechanical Phenomena In Electronic Systems, Las Vegas, USA, 2004, p.213.
  10. P. Zhang, J. Li, D. Wang, J. Liu, IEEE 3rd International Electrical and Energy Conference (CIEEC), Beijing, China, 2019, p.270.
  11. G. Xu, J. Xue, Y. Cheng, W. Zhu, L. Luo, 7th International Conference on Electronic Packaging Technology, Shanghai, China, 2006, p.6.
  12. C.J. Shih, G.C. Liu, IEEE T. Compon. Pack. T. 27/3 (2004) 551.
  13. K. Sikka, K.E. Torrance, C.U. Scholler, P.I. Salanova, IEEE T. Compon. Pack. T. 25/2 (2002) 283.
  14. D.-K. Kim, J.-K. Bae, S.J. Kim, 11th Intersociety Conference on Thermal and Thermomechanical Phenomena in Electronic Systems, Orlando, USA, 2008, p.360.
  15. M.Z.M. Hanafi, F.S. Ismail, R. Rosli, 10th Asian 1 Control Conference (ASCC), Kota Kinabalu, Malaysia, 2015, p.5.
  16. Y. Shabany, Twenty-fourth Annual IEEE Semiconductor Thermal Measurement and Management Symposium, San Jose, USA, 2008, p.132.
  17. A. Arjunan, P. Kumaresan, Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Fluid, Thermal and Energy Systems, India, 2022, p.537.
  18. O. McCay, R. Nimmagadda, S.M. Ali, T. Persoons, Fluids. 8/8 (2023) 234.
  19. L. Dewilde, S.M. Ali, R. Nimmagadda, Tim Persoons, Fluids, 9/11 (2024) 254.
  20. C.Y. Khor, M.A.M. Nawi, M.I. Ishak, W.C. Kee, M.U. Rosli, M.R. Jamalludin, et al., IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 932 (2020) 012106.
  21. M.M. Mansour, H.S. Salman, A.A. Ugla, Int. Sci. Congr. Pure Appl. Technol. Sci. 10 (2023) 120.
  22. A. Kumar, U. Dasari, M.K. Mondal, COMSOL Conference 2018, Lausanne, Switzerland, 2018.
  23. W. Li, N. Mao, T. He, J. Gong, J. gong, Appl. Therm. Eng. 252 (2024) 123667.

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.