Abstract
This research discusses the compliance of PT X's Office Letter Automation (OLA) system with the functional requirements for controlling access rights based on ISO 16175-2 2011. PT X has been using the system since 2019, OLA is a web-based application used to control correspondence and other activities. Electronic records management in PT X. This research aims to identify whether OLA meets EDRMS standards related to access rights or access control. This research uses a qualitative approach by studying literature and making observations to identify the implementation accuracy according to the ISO 16175-2:2011 standard requirements, which is examined with OLA as the research object. The research results show that of the 17-access control functional requirements, OLA can fulfill 16 mandatory requirements. So, it does not meet the minimum standards required by the standards and is included in the major findings. For this reason, organizations need to take corrective and preventive actions so that OLA can comply with the ISO 16175-2 2011 standard requirements. However, overall, OLA is good enough to support electronic security management activities, especially for security systems in the access rights section.
Bahasa Abstract
Penelitian ini membahas tentang kepatuhan sistem Office Letter Automation (OLA) PT X terhadap persyaratan fungsional pengendalian hak akses berdasarkan ISO 16175-2 2011. PT X telah menggunakan sistem tersebut sejak tahun 2019, dan OLA merupakan aplikasi berbasis web yang digunakan untuk pengendalian kegiatan korespondensi dan kegiatan manajemen arsip elektronik di perusahaan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi apakah OLA memenuhi standar EDRMS terkait dengan hak akses atau access control. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan cara studi literatur dan melakukan observasi untuk mengetahui ketepatan implementasi sesuai persyaratan standar ISO 16175-2:2011 yang diteliti dengan OLA sebagai objek penelitian. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa dari 17 persyaratan fungsional kontrol akses, OLA dapat memenuhi 16 persyaratan wajib. Sehingga belum memenuhi standar minimum persyaratan yang diminta oleh standar dan masuk dalam temuan major. Untuk itu organisasi perlu melakukan tindakan perbaikan dan pencegahan agar OLA dapat comply dengan perminataan standar ISO 16175-2 2011. Namun secara keseluruhan OLA sudah cukup baik dalam mendukung kegiatan manajemen arsip elektronik khsusunya untuk sistem kemanan pada bagian hak akses.
References
Adam, A. (2007). Implementing Electronic Document and Record Management Systems. In Implementing Electronic Document and Record Management Systems. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780849380600
Anugrah, E. P. (2020). Electronic Record Keeping to Support Indonesia E-Government Implementation. Record and Library Journal, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.20473/rlj.v6-i1.2020.31-44
Badan Standardisasi Nasional. (2018). SNI ISO 15489-1-2016 tentang Informasi dan dokumentasi - Pengelolaan arsip - Bagian 1: Konsep dan prinsip (p. 31). BSN.
Cruz, J. P., Kaji, Y., & Yanai, N. (2018). RBAC-SC: Role-based access control using smart contract. IEEE Access, 6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2812844
Fachmi, A., & Mayesti, N. (2021). Kepatuhan Functional Requrements Hak Akses pada Electronic Records Management System Arteri. JIPI (Jurnal Ilmu Perpustakaan Dan Informasi), 6(1), 61. https://doi.org/10.30829/jipi.v6i1.9264
Holliday, J. (2009). Professional SharePoint 2007 Records Management Development: Managing Official Records with Microsoft Office SharePoint Server 2007 (1st ed.). Wrox Press.
Joseph, P., Debowski, S., & Goldschmidt, P. (2012). Paradigm shifts in recordkeeping responsibilities: implications for ISO 15489’s implementation. Records Management Journal, 22(1), 57–75. https://doi.org/10.1108/09565691211222108
Kennedy, J., & Schauder, C. (1998). The records life cycle model and the records Continuum Model. In Records Management (pp. 9–12). Addison Wesley Longman Australia.
Peraturan Arsip Nasional Republik Indonesia Nomor 6 Tahun 2021 Tentang Pengelolaan Arsip Elektronik, Arsip Nasional Republik Indonesia 24 (2021).
Kistanto, N. H., Lestari, N., & Subekti, S. (2014). Etika Profesi Kearsipan (Ed.2). Universitas Terbuka.
Kruse, C. S., Smith, B., Vanderlinden, H., & Nealand, A. (2017). Security Techniques for the Electronic Health Records. Journal of Medical Systems, 41(8), 127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-017-0778-4
Mulyantono, I. (2016). Otomasi Dalam Kearsipan (Edisi 2). Universitas Terbuka.
Nara. (2023). NARA Records Management Key Terms and Acronyms 1 NARA Records Management Key Terms and Acronyms. Archives.Gov. https://www.archives.gov/files/records-mgmt/rm-glossary-of-terms.pdf
Pratiwi, D. (2019). Manajemen Rekod Aktif ((Edisi 2)). Universitas Terbuka.
Rahma, N., & Mayesti, N. (2019). Pengendalian Hak Akses pada Electronic Document and Records Management System di Kementerian Kelautan dan Perikanan Republik Indonesia. Lentera Pustaka: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Perpustakaan, Informasi Dan Kearsipan, 5(1), 33. https://doi.org/10.14710/lenpust.v5i1.23578
Republik Indonesia. (2009). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 43 Tahun 2009 Tentang Kearsipan.
Rustam, M. (2019). Pengelolaan Arsip Elektronik (Edisi 2). Universitas Terbuka.
Saffady, W. (2009). Managing Electronic Records (Fourth Edi). Neal-Schuman Publishers, Inc.
Sari, W. M., & Rahmah, E. (2013). Kebijakan Akses dan Layanan Arsip di Kantor Perpustakaan, Arsip dan Dokumentasi (KPAD) Kota Bukit Tinggi. Jurnal Ilmu Informasi Perpustakaan Dan Kearsipan, 2 No. 1(September), 237–245.
Sugiarto, A., & Wahyono, T. (2015). Manajemen Kearsipan Modern (Dari Konvensional ke Basis Komputer) (Pertama). Gava Media.
Sutirman, S. (2016). URGENSI MANAJEMEN ARSIP ELEKTRONIK. EFISIENSI - KAJIAN ILMU ADMINISTRASI, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.21831/efisiensi.v13i1.7861
Svärd, P. (2017). Enterprise content management, records management and information culture amidst E-government development. In Enterprise Content Management, Records Management and Information Culture Amidst E-Government Development.
The International Standard Organization. (2016). ISO 15489-1: 2016 Information And Documentation — Records Management. PART 1: CONCEPTS AND PRINCIPLES.
ISO 16175-2: 2011 – Principles and functional requitements for records in electronic office environments, The International Standards Organisation (2011).
University of Edinburgh. (2023). Literature review | The University of Edinburgh. Institute for Academic Development University of Edinburgh. https://www.ed.ac.uk/institute-academic-development/study-hub/learning-resources/literature-review
Recommended Citation
Faturohmah, Trina Nur and Fachmi, Achmad
(2023)
"Kepatuhan Persyaratan Fungsional Pengendalian Hak Akses pada OLA (Office Letter Automation) Berdasarkan ISO 16175-2: 2011,"
Jurnal Ilmu Informasi, Perpustakaan dan Kearsipan: Vol. 25:
No.
2, Article 5.
DOI: 10.7454/JIPK.v25i2.1001
Available at:
https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/jipk/vol25/iss2/5
Included in
Archival Science Commons, Arts and Humanities Commons, Collection Development and Management Commons, Information Literacy Commons