"A Composite Multiple-based Stock Valuation Model" by Mudita Lau, Maria Widyarini et al.
  •  
  •  
 

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International License.

Abstract

This study seeks to examine whether a composite valuation model (made of several multiples) can outperform a single-multiple valuation model in valuation accuracy. This study applied a trial-and-error iteration using scripts written in R studio to optimize the weight of each multiple in each composite, aiming to reach a minimum valuation error for each composite valuation model. Based on financial data of 2009-2019, a composite valuation model performs better than a single-multiple valuation model in assessing all peer groups, achieving up to 18% greater accuracy, which is a significant improvement. The result suggests that a composite valuation model generally offers superior valuation accuracy. Academics and institutional investors searching for improved valuation accuracy may consider a composite valuation model as an alternative method. This study adds empirical evidence to the current knowledge on multiple-based valuation models, highlighting the potential advantages of a composite valuation model over a single-multiple model.

References

Agnes Cheng, C. S., & McNamara, R. A. Y. (2000). The valuation accuracy of the price-earnings and price-book benchmark valuation methods. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 15(4), 349–370. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012050524545/METRICS

Alford, A. W. (1992). The Effect of the Set of Comparable Firms on the Accuracy of the Price-Earnings Valuation Method. Journal of Accounting Research, 30(1), 94. https://doi.org/10.2307/2491093

Aljifri, K., & Ahmad, H. I. (2019). Choosing Valuation Models in the UAE. Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation, 30, 191–203. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10737-6_13

Asche, F., & Misund, B. (2016). Who’s a major? A novel approach to peer group selection: Empirical evidence from oil and gas companies. Cogent Economics & Finance, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2016.1264538

Brahmana, R. K., & Hooy, C.-W. (2011). The Equity Valuation Accuracy among Multiple Screening Models: A Study from an Emerging Stock Market. International Business Management, 5(2), 50–57. https://doi.org/10.3923/ibm.2011.50.57

Chan, K. (2016). EQUITY VALUATION USING BENCHMARK MULTIPLES: AN IMPROVED APPROACH USING REGRESSION-BASED WEIGHTS. Corporate Ownership and Control, 13(4Cont3), 483–496. https://doi.org/10.22495/COCV13I4C3P7

Charumathi, B., & S, S. E. (2014). Comparing Stock Valuation Models for Indian Bank Stocks. International Journal of Accounting, 2(2), 2372–4986.

Damodaran, A. (2012). Investment valuation : tools and techniques for determining the value of any asset. John Wiley & Sons. Inc.

Deng, M., Easton, P. D., & Yeo, J. (2012). Another Look at Equity and Enterprise Valuation Based on Multiples. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1462794

Erkilet, G., Janke, G., & Kasperzak, R. (2022). How valuation approach choice affects financial analysts’ target price accuracy. Journal of Business Economics, 92(5), 741–779. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11573-021-01061-W/TABLES/7

Frensidy, B., Pelealu, R. J., & Robiyanto, R. (2020). Analysis of Equity Valuation Models and Target Price Accuracy: An Evidence From Analyst Reports in Indonesia. SAGE Open, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020949507

Huikku, J., & Pöyhiä, A.-M. (2020). Sell-Side Analysts’ Valuation Model Choice: A Case Study. Nordic Journal of Business, 69(4), 39–67.

Imam, S., Chan, J., & Shah, S. Z. A. (2013). Equity valuation models and target price accuracy in Europe: Evidence from equity reports. International Review of Financial Analysis, 28, 9–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IRFA.2013.02.008

Keun Yoo, Y. (2006). The valuation accuracy of equity valuation using a combination of multiples. Review of Accounting and Finance, 5(2), 108–123. https://doi.org/10.1108/14757700610668958/FULL/XML

Koesoemasari, D. S. P., Nirmala, N., Rokhayati, I., Harsuti, H., & Pamuji, U. (2023). The Relationship between Fundamental Analysis and Stock Returns Using Panel Data: Evidence from Kompas 100 Indonesia. Eduvest - Journal of Universal Studies, 3(6), 1161–1168. https://doi.org/10.59188/EDUVEST.V3I6.840

Kumar, B. R. (2019). Determinants of Relative Valuation in Different Industry Sectors—An Empirical Study. The Journal of Wealth Management, 22(1), 73–85. https://doi.org/10.3905/JWM.2019.22.1.073

Li, Y. (2021). Improving the Accuracy of Estimated Intrinsic Value Through Industry-Specific Valuation Models. Review of Business & Finance Studies, 21(1), 78–89. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3942064

Lie, E., & Lie, H. J. (2002). Multiples Used to Estimate Corporate Value. Financial Analysts Journal, 58(2), 44–54. https://doi.org/10.2469/FAJ.V58.N2.2522

Namira, F., & Nugroho, B. Y. (2017). Effect of Enterprise Multiple on Stock Return Non-Financial Companies in Indonesian Stock Exchange. Bisnis & Birokrasi Journal, 23(2). https://doi.org/10.20476/jbb.v23i2.9006

Nel, S., & le Roux, N. (2017). The valuation performance of mathematically-optimised, equity-based composite multiples. Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science, 22(43), 224–250. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEFAS-02-2017-0042/FULL/PDF

Nel, W., Bruwer, B., & Roux, N. le. (2013). The Impact Of Industry Classification On The Valuation Accuracy Of Multiples In The South African Capital Market. International Business & Economics Research Journal (IBER), 12(1), 79–102. https://doi.org/10.19030/IBER.V12I1.7514

Nel, W. S. (2009). The use of multiples in the South African equity market: is the popularity of the price earnings ratio justifiable from a sector perspective? Meditari Accountancy Research, 17(2), 101–115. https://doi.org/10.1108/10222529200900014

Öcal, H., & Kamil, A. A. (2021). Risk-Return Based Performance Evaluation of Stocks in BIST 100 and KOMPAS 100 Indices of Borsa Istanbul and Indonesian Stock Exchange. SciPap 2021, Vol. 29, Article 1283, 29(2). https://doi.org/10.46585/SP29021283

Penman, S. H. (1998). Combining Earnings and Book Value in Equity Valuation*. Contemporary Accounting Research, 15(3), 291–324. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1911-3846.1998.TB00562.X

Penman, S. H. (2013). Financial Statement Analysis and Security Valuation (5th ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Pinto, J. E., Robinson, T. R., & Stowe, J. D. (2019). Equity valuation: A survey of professional practice. Review of Financial Economics, 37(2), 219–233. https://doi.org/10.1002/RFE.1040

Pratama, A. (2021). Tumbuh Pesat, Jumlah Investor Saham di BEI Bertambah Satu Juta di 2021. IDX Channel. https://www.idxchannel.com/market-news/tumbuh-pesat-jumlah-investor-saham-di-bei-bertambah-satu-juta-di-2021

Prusak, B. (2017). The accuracy of alternative stock valuation methods – the case of the Warsaw Stock Exchange. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 30(1), 416–438. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2017.1305793

Rossi, E., & Forte, G. (2016b). Assessing relative valuation in equity markets: Bridging research and practice. Assessing Relative Valuation in Equity Markets: Bridging Research and Practice, 1–180. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-56335-4/COVER

Schreiner, A. (2007). Equity valuation using multiples: An empirical investigation. In Equity Valuation Using Multiples: An Empirical Investigation. Springer Gabler. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8350-9531-1/COVER

Sehgal, S., & Pandey, A. (2010). Equity Valuation Using Price Multiples: A Comparative Study for BRICKS. Asian Journal of Finance & Accounting, 2(1), 68–91. https://doi.org/10.5296/AJFA.V2I1.283

Sutedja, B. S., Yakob, N. A., & McGowan, C. B. (2014). Relative Valuation Approach for Valuing Equity in Malaysia. Handbook of Asian Finance: REITs, Trading, and Fund Performance, 2, 207–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-800986-4.00011-X

Yooyanyong, P., Suwanragsa, I., & Tangjitprom, N. (2020). The Accuracy of Various Value Drivers of Price Multiple Method in Determining Equity Price. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(1), 29–36. https://doi.org/10.13106/JAFEB.2020.VOL7.NO1.29

JBB - Statement of Authorship.docx (13 kB)
Statement of Authorship

JBB - Reviewer Comments and Revisions Table.docx (18 kB)
Reviewer Comments and Revisions Table

Feedback_and_article_revision_JBB_Investigating_Banking_Research FINAL.docx (32 kB)
Reviewer Comments and Revisions Table

First Page

83

Last Page

93

Plum Print visual indicator of research metrics
PlumX Metrics
  • Usage
    • Downloads: 221
    • Abstract Views: 66
  • Captures
    • Readers: 2
see details

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.