•  
  •  
 

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International License.

Abstract

Training is essential to guide and equip SMEs with the necessary skill sets to adapt to the disruption of the COVID-19 pandemic. The budget limitation urged DKI Jakarta Provincial Government (DJPG) to change their conventional training program for SMEs and arrange an IT-based platform enabling all city entities, including private and non-private sectors, to participate in a coproduction scheme. This study employed the performance outcomes framework to examine the impacts of coproduction in entrepreneurship training for SMEs by comparing contract-based and coproduction-based training conducted by DJPG, including the impacts on the deliverables and budget. The results indicate that overall, coproduction-based training is proven to be more efficient, effective, and flexible than contract-based training. This study suggests that coproduction-based training programs deserve to be allocated a significant portion of the government entrepreneurship training agenda while maintaining essential contract-based training programs to ensure the continuity of the government budget in this field.

References

Abeysekera, R., Patton, D., & Mullineux, A. (2015). Co-production in business counselling in microfinance setting: A conceptual approach. Journal of Enterprising Culture, 23(03), 299–319.

Abeysekera, R. (2020). Co-production in BDS: The evidence from the Sri Lankan microfinance sector. Financial Markets, Institutions and Risks, 4(3), 63–71.

Anandhika, M. R., Hassan, F. R., & Nugraha, Y. (2020). Towards a collaborative framework for the large-scale social collaboration: A case of Jakarta's response to the Covid-19 pandemic. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on ICT for Smart Society (ICISS), 7(1), 1-7.

Bovaird, T. (2007). Beyond engagement and participation: User and community coproduction of public services. Public Administration Review, 67(5), 846-860.

Bovaird, T., & Loeffler, E. (2012). We’re all in this together: Harnessing user and community co-production of public outcomes [Discussion Paper]. Institute of Local Government Studies, University of Birmingham, United Kingdom.

Brudney, J. L., & Duncombe, W. D. (1992). An economic evaluation of paid, volunteer, and mixed staffing options for public services. Public Administration Review, 52(5), 474-481.

Coordinating Ministry of Economic Affairs. (2021). UMKM menjadi pilar penting dalam perekonomian Indonesia [In Bahasa Indonesia.] https://ekon.go.id/publikasi/detail/2969/umkm-menjadi-pilar-penting-dalam-perekonomian-indonesia [accessed May 28, 2022].

Fledderus, J., & Honingh, M. (2015). Why people co-produce within activation services: the necessity of motivation and trust - an investigation of selection biases in a municipal activation programme in the Netherlands. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 82(1), 69-87.

Garlatti, A., Fedele, P., Iacuzzi, S., & Garlatti Costa, G. (2019). Coproduction and cost efficiency: A structured literature review. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 32(1), 114–135.

Government of Jakarta. (2021). Presentasi Kolaborasi Sosial Berskala Besar UMKM [In Bahasa Indonesia] [Policy Brief]. Governors Task Force,

Government of Jakarta. Government of Jakarta. (2022a). Data pelatihan kewirausahaan tahun 2018-2022 [In Bahasa Indonesia] [Policy Brief]. The Office of SME, Government of Jakarta.

Government of Jakarta. (2022b). Program Kolaborasi Sosial Berskala Besar UMKM. [In Bahasa Indonesia] https://corona.jakarta.go.id/id/ksbb-umkm [accessed May 27, 2022]

Government of Jakarta. (2022c). APBD DKI Jakarta. [In Bahasa Indonesia] https://apbd.jakarta.go.id/ [accessed May 30, 2022]

Guji, T. N. (2018). The impact of entrepreneurship training on business performance of small and micro enterprises (The case of some selected city administrations-in Oromia Regional State). European Journal of Business and Management, 10(22), 66–71.

Istiandari, R., & Anandhika, M. R. (2019). The role of gender in micro and small enterprise business development in Indonesia: A firm-level analysis [Policy Paper]. Asia Pacific Foundation Canada.

Jakobsen, M., & Andersen, S. C. (2013). Coproduction and equity in public service delivery. Public Administration Review, 73(5), 704-713.

Brix, J., Krogstrup, H. K., & Mortensen, N. M. (2020). Evaluating the outcomes of co-production in local government. Local Government Studies, 46(2), 169–185.

Kasi, V., & Tang, X. (2005). Design attributes and performance outcomes: A framework for comparing business processes. Proceedings of the Eighth Annual Conference of the Southern Association of Information Systems (SAIS), 8(1), 226-232.

Kithae, P. P., Maganjo, R., & Kavinda, L. (2013). Impact of entrepreneurship training on performance of Micro and Small Enterprises (MSES) in Kenya: A case study of Embu Municipality. International Journal of Business and Management Review, 1(2), 1–17.

Loeffler, E., & Bovaird, T. (2016). User and community co-production of public services: What does the evidence tell us?. International Journal of Public Administration, 39(13), 1006-1019.

Loeffler, E. (2021). Co-Production of Public Services and Outcomes (1st ed.). Palgrave Macmillan.

Ministry of Cooperative and SME. (2022, May 29). Dashboard Satu Data KUMKM. [In Bahasa Indonesia] https://satudata.kemenkopukm.go.id/kumkm_dashboard/ [accessed May 29, 2022]

Mullineux, A. W., Akeysekera, R., & Patton, D. (2017). Co-production in business training in microfinance institutions: A conceptual approach. World Review of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, 13(1), 52-68.

Nabatchi, T., Sancino, A., & Sicilia, M. (2017). Varieties of participation in public services: The who, when, and what of coproduction. Public Administration Review, 77(5), 766–776.

Nursini, N. (2020). Micro, small, and medium enterprises (MSMEs) and poverty reduction: Empirical evidence from Indonesia. Development Studies Research, 7(1), 153-166.

Ostrom, E. (1996). Crossing the great divide: Coproduction, synergy, and development. World Development, 24(6), 1073-1087.

Rice, M. P. (2002). Co-production of business assistance in business incubators: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Venturing, 17(2), 163–187.

Roberts, A., Townsend, S., Morris, J., Rushbrooke, E., Greenhill, B., Whitehead, R., & Golding, L. (2013). Treat me right, treat me equal: Using national policy and legislation to create positive changes in local health services for people with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 26(1), 14-25.

Sorrentino, M., Sicilia, M., & Howlett, M. (2018). Understanding co-production as a new public governance tool. Policy and Society, 37(3), 277–293.

Steen, T., & Brandsen, T. (2020). Coproduction during and after the COVID -19 Pandemic: Will It Last? Public Administration Review, 80(5), 851–855.

Taneo, S. Y. M., Noya, S., Melany, M., & Setiyati, E. A. (2022). The role of local government in improving resilience and performance of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises in Indonesia. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 9(3), 245-256

Weerakkody, W., & Ediriweera, A. (2010). Impact of training and development on business performance: with reference to SMEs in Gampaha District. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Business Management, 7(1), 82-96.

Additional Files
authorship-statement_Fazlur Rahman Hassan.pdf (337 kB)
authorship-statement

First Page

88

Last Page

99

Download

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.