Antropologi Indonesia
Abstract
This study identifies the utilization of Social and Built Capital by the Kaum Depok Community in maintaining community existence amidst social transformation. Previous research on the Kaum Depok and similar ethnic communities found that group self-identity, the role of values-religion-beliefs, architecture, the use of distinctive/local language, and the inclusivity nature of the group significantly contribute to the community's existence. I agree that these aspects impact this ethnic community's existence, however the community capital, particularly social and built capital, plays a crucial role in the effort to preserve the community. This study employs a qualitative approach to classify and analyze community's potentials based on the Community Capital Framework. This research found that Built and Social capital functions as a main support for other forms of community capital, especially political and financial capital, in maintaining the existence of the community in Depok City.
References
Absor, N. F., Wahyudin, Santosa, Y. B., and N. R. Abdillah.
2022 Identification of Cultural Heritage in Depok as an Effort to Developing Society
Historical Awareness. Santhet, 1–5.
Asy-Syahid, M. A.
2020 Cagar Budaya dan Representasi Identitas Kota Depok. In Arif Susanto, ed.
Merawat Tunas Kesadaran: Agama, Pendidikan, dan Kebudayaan dalam Masyarakat Majemuk, pp. 205–213. Jakarta: Pusat Studi Islam dan Kenegaraan Indonesia (PSIK-Indonesia).
Astutik, J., & Ramadhoan, R.
2020 Shared Identity as Social Capital in The Chinese-Javanese Relations in Malang City, Indonesia. Journal of Social and Political Sciences, 922-939
Baum, F. E., and A. M. Ziersch.
2003 Social Capital. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 57(5): 320–323. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25570000.
Dofany, G., and L. Suratminto.
2013 Penerapan Faktor-Faktor Interaksi Sosial pada Kehidupan Komunitas Belanda Depok dari Masa Cornelis Chastelein hingga Pra-Kemerdekaan Republik Indonesia. Depok: Artikel Ilmiah Pascasarjana, Program Studi Sastra Belanda Universitas Indonesia.
Edison, F. T.
2000 Komunitas Kristen Depok Asli: Suatu Kajian Kasus Mengenai GPIB Immanuel Depok. Jakarta: Tesis Pascasarjana Antropologi Universitas Indonesia.
Flora, C. B., and J. L. Flora.
2013 Rural Communities: Legacy and Change. 4th edition.
Irsyam, T. W.
2017 Berkembang dalam Bayang-Bayang Jakarta: Sejarah Depok 1950-1990-an. Jakarta: Yayasan Pustaka Obor.
Jacobs, C.
2007 Measuring Success in Communities: Understanding the Community Capitals Framework. Extension Extra, SDSU.
Jonathans, Y.
2011 Depok Tempo Doeloe. Jakarta: Penerbit Libri.
Kretzmann, J. P., and J. L. McKnight.
1993 Building Communities from the Inside Out: A Path Toward Finding and Mobilizing Community's Assets. Chicago: ACTA Publications.
Kwisthout, J. K.
2015 Jejak-Jejak Masa Lalu Depok: Warisan Cornelis Chastelein (1657–1714) kepada Para Budaknya yang Dibebaskan. Trans. Hallie Jonathans and Corry Longdong. Jakarta: PT. BPK Gunung Mulia.
Luoma-aho, V.
2018 On Putnam: Bowling Together—Applying Putnam’s Theories of Community and Social Capital to Public Relations. Pp. 194–214. doi: 10.4324/9781315271231-11.
Machmudi, Y.
2006 Jemaah Tarbiyah and Islamisation in Indonesia. Canberra: ANU E. Press.
Malingkas, Y.
1996 Situasi Kebahasaan di Kelurahan Pancoran Mas, Depok. Depok: Skripsi Sarjana Universitas Indonesia.
Marzali, A.
1975 Krisis Identitas pada Orang Depok Asli. Berita Antropologi, 1–17.
Megasari, J.
2014 Social Integration between Chinese and Javanese Ethnic Groups: A Study of the Chinese Community in Kranggan Subdistrict, Semarang City. Master’s Thesis, Department of Social Welfare, University of Indonesia.
Mudaryanti, T. W.
2016 Dari Depok Lama ke Depok Baru: Berjuang Menjadi Kota, 1970an – 1990an. SASDAYA, Gadjah Mada Journal of Humanities, 113–139.
Nopianti, R; Riawanti, S; Rajab, B.
2019 Identitas Orang Tugu Sebagai Keturunan Portugis Di Jakarta. Patanjala, 169-184
Park, J.
2010 Civic Networks and Building Social Capital in Indonesia: An Innovative Experiment by Chinese Organisations in the Post-Soeharto Era. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL AND AREA STUDIES, 75-90.
Pratama, A. Y., Wijaya, D. N., Masruroh, H., & Yafie, E.
2022 Hybrid Identities In Kampung Tugu Jakarta. ISOLEC (pp. 19-23). Malang: Faculty of Letters, Universitas Negeri Malang.
Putnam, R.
2001 Bowling Alone. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Schneider, J.
2004 The Role of Social Capital in Building Healthy Communities. Annie E. Casey Foundation, Making Connections Initiative. www.aecf.org.
Trifosa, F. M., & Sutisna, S.
2023 MENGEMBALIKAN MEMORI KAMPUNG TUGU MELALUI RUANG KEBUDAYAAN KAMPUNG TUGU, JAKARTA. Jurnal Stupa, 27-38.
Universitetet i, Bergen and Barth, F. 1969 Ethnic Groups and Boundaries: The Social Organization of Culture Difference. Little, Brown.
Vilma, Luoma-aho.
2018 On Putnam : Bowling Together - Applying Putnam’s Theories of Community and Social Capital to Public Relations. 194-214. doi: 10.4324/9781315271231-11
Recommended Citation
Susatyo, Yoga
(2024)
"Fostering Ruins: The Tales of Kaum Depok,"
Antropologi Indonesia: Vol. 45:
Iss.
1, Article 6.
DOI: 10.7454/jai.v45i2.1046
Available at:
https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/jai/vol45/iss1/6
Included in
Anthropology Commons, Community-Based Research Commons, Ethnic Studies Commons, Indigenous Studies Commons, Politics and Social Change Commons