"Kekerabatan sebagai Pranata Sosial yang Mempengaruhi Agency Perlawanan" by Popy Dwi Patrojani and Suraya Afiff
  •  
  •  
 

Antropologi Indonesia

Abstract

Studies have shown the importance of identity politics in the ability for small-holders to form a solidarity in a collective action protest against development project. However, those studies do not show how the kinship relations in the context of adat system could shape the agency of small-holder to organize collective resistance against the development project that affects their livelihoods. Although we are not denying the importance of traditional kinship relations in developing solidarity among agrarian communities in Indonesia to carry out a public protest, kinship relations system might also be used by other interest such as government, contractor, and traditional leader for shaping some forms of resistance action. Drawing from ethnographic study of the small-holders protests against a governmental irrigation project in West Sumatera, we attempt to show how social relations in the traditional kinship system have significantly shaped their ability to carry out open public protest and gain collective support. Small-holder ability to act need to be analyzed in the complex power relations dynamic among actors involved who are embedded in the traditional kinship relationships that were practiced. Small-holders agency of resistance was hindered by the government and project contractor strategy to incorporate the key traditional leaders into the project.

References

Abu-Lughod, L. (1990). The romance of resistance: Tracing transformations of power through bedouin women. American Ethnologist, 17(1), 41-55. Afandi, M. (2018). Perlawanan ekstra-legal: “Transformasi perlawanan petani menghadapi korporasi perkebunan”. BHUMI: Jurnal Agraria dan Pertanahan, 0(37), 63-95. doi:10.31292/jb.v0i37.152 Afiff, S., Fauzi, N., Hart, G., Ntsebeza, L., & Peluso, N. (2005). Redefining agrarian power: Resurgent agrarian movements in West Java, Indonesia. UC Berkeley: Center for Southeast Asia Studies. Diambil dari https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7rf2p49g Afrida, A. (2016). Pembangunan jalan lingkar Padang Pariaman dan pengaruhnya terhadap permasalahan konflik pertanahan. Jurnal Antropologi: Isu-Isu Sosial Budaya, 17(2), 145- 160. doi:10.25077/jantro.v17.n2.p145-160.2015 Agrawal, A., & Gibson, C. C. (Eds.). (2001). Communities and the environment: Ethnicity, gender, and the state in community-based conservation. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press. Ahearn, L. M. (2001). Language and agency. Annual Review of Anthropology, 30, 109-137. Antara-Sumbar. (2019). Wagub minta pembangunan tol dibatalkan jika ganti rugi tak layak. Antara News Sumbar. Diambil dari https://sumbar.antaranews.com/berita/241498/wagub-mintapembangunan- tol-dibatalkan-jika-ganti-rugi-tak-layak Aprianto, T. C. (2018). Perampasan tanah dan konflik: Kisah perlawanan sedulur sikep. BHUMI: Jurnal Agraria dan Pertanahan, 0(37), 157-168. doi:10.31292/jb.v0i37.156 Aryal, R. (2018). Kinship as a social capital in rural development: An anthropological perspective. Dhaulagiri: Journal of Sociology & Anthropology, 12, 88-97. Ashartanto, M. C. (2018). Perlawanan masyarakat UKPWR terhadap pembangunan PLTU di Kabupaten Batang, Jawa Tengah. (Sarjana Thesis), Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta. Astuti, E. Z. L. (2012). Konflik pasir besi: Pro dan kontra rencana penambangan pasir besi di Kabupaten Kulon Progo. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, 16(1), 62-74. doi:10.22146/jsp.10912 Aziz, M. (2011). Identitas kaum Samin pasca kolonia pergulatan negara, agama, dan adat dalam pro-kontra pembangunan pabrik semen di Sukolilo, Pati, Jawa Tengah. Jurnal Kawistara, 2(3). doi:10.22146/kawistara.3937 Barnes, J. A. (2004 [1971]). Three styles in the study of kinship. In. Diambil dari ProQuest Ebook Central, https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/unimelb/detail.action?docID=1539381. Benda-Beckmann, F. v., & Benda-Beckmann, K. v. (2012). Islamic law in a plural context: The struggle over inheritance law in colonial West Sumatra. Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient, 55(4/5), 771-793. Blackwood, E. (1997). Women, land, and labor: Negotiating clientage and kinship in a Minangkabau peasant community. Ethnology, 36(4), 277-293. Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice (R. Nice, Trans. 1st English Ed edition ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Caouette, D., & Turner, S. (Eds.). (2009). Agrarian angst and rural resistance in contemporary southeast asia. London and New York: Routledge. Castells, M. (2009). The power of identity (2nd Edition, with a New Preface edition ed.). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. Fringka, Y. (2017). Resistensi berbasis adat: Perlawanan masyarakat nagari iii koto, Tanah Datar, Sumatera Barat, terhadap rencana tambang Bukit Batubasi. Masyarakat: Jurnal Sosiologi, 21(2). doi:10.7454/mjs.v21i2.4670 Goldfarb, K. E., & Schuster, C. E. (2016). Introduction: (de)materializing kinship - holding together mutuality and difference. Social Analysis, 60(2), 1-12. Haboddin, M. (2011). Masyarakat adat melawan perusahaan: Kasus di Kalimantan Barat. Governance (Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan), 2(1), 25-41. He, S., & Xue, D. (2014). Identity building and communal resistance against landgrabs in Wukan village, China. Current Anthropology, 55(S9), S126-S137. doi:10.1086/676132 Holy, L. (1996). Anthropological perspectives on kinship. London, Chicago, IL: Pluto Press. Intan, N. (2018). Peran pemuka adat sebagai mediator terhadap penyelesaian konflik dalam proses perkawinan pada masyarakat Muna di Sulawesi Tenggara. Melayunesia Law, 2(1), 1-10. doi:10.30652/ml.v2i1.5491 Irwansyah. (2017). Interaksi Muslim dan Kristiani dalam ikatan kekerabatan di Sumatera Utara. MIQOT, 41(1), 209-229. Kasper, C., & Mulder, M. B. (2015). Who helps and why?: Cooperative networks in mpimbwe. Current Anthropology, 56(5), 701-732. doi:10.1086/683024 Li, T. M. (1996). Images of community: Discourse and strategy in property relations. Development and Change, 27, 501-527. Li, T. M. (2007). The will to improve: Governmentality, development, and the practice of politics. Durham: Duke University Press Books. Lucas, A., & Warren, C. (2013). The land, the law, and the people. In A. Lucas & C. Warren (Eds.), Land for the people: The state and agrarian conflict in Indonesia. Athens: Ohio University Press. Ortner, S. B. (1984). Theory in anthropology since the sixties. Comparative Studies in Society and Histories, 26(1), 126-166. Ortner, S. B. (1997). Thick resistance: Death and the cultural construction of agency in Himalayan mountaineering. Representations, 59, 135-162. Ortner, S. B. (2001). Specifying agency the comaroffs and their critics. Interventions, 3(1), 76-84. Pebrianti, C. (2018, 12 March 2018). Warga Ponorogo kembali tuntut ganti rugi dampak proyek Waduk Bendo. detiknews. Diambil dari https://news.detik.com/berita-jawa-timur/d- 3912158/warga-ponorogo-kembali-tuntut-ganti-rugi-dampak-proyek-waduk-bendo Peletz, M. G. (1995). Kinship studies in late twentieth-century anthropology. Annual Review of Anthropology, 24, 343-372. Peng, Y. (2004). Kinship networks and entrepreneurs in China’s transitional economy. American Journal of Sociology, 109(5), 1045-1074. Prayogo, D. (2008). Konflik antara korporasi dengan komunitas lokal: Sebuah kasus emprik pada industri geotermal di Jawa Barat. Depok: FISIP UI Press. Purwaningsih, T. (2015). Politik kekerabatan dan kualitas kandidat di Sulawesi Selatan. Jurnal Politik, 1(1), 97-123. Putri, C. M. (2016). Peran kedamangan dalam menyelesaikan konflik pemanfaatan Bukit Puruk Kambang antara masyarakat hukum adat Suku Dayak Siang dan PT. Indo Muro Kencana (studi kasus di Kabupaten Murung Raya Provinsi Kalimantan Tengah). (Skripsi Thesis), Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta. Rohman, A. (2014). The comparison of power and authority of women in China and Minangkabau societies. Humanities & Social Studies, 2(12), 141-145. Rutten, R., Bakker, L., Alano, M. L., Salerno, T., Savitri, L. A., & Shohibuddin, M. (2017). Smallholder bargaining power in large-scale land deals: A relational perspective. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 44(4), 891-917. doi:10.1080/03066150.2016.1277991 Safril, R. (2013). Analisis peran lembaga adat dalam menyelesaikan konflik tanah ulayat (studi kasus konflik tanah ulayat masyarakat adat Kenegerian Gunung Shailan dengan PT. Rapp di Kabupaten Kampar). (Skripsi Thesis), Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau, Pekanbaru. Schneider, D. M. (1984). A critique of the study of kinship. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Scott, J. C. (1987). Weapons of the weak: Everyday forms of peasant resistance (Reprint edition ed.). New Haven: Yale University Press. Scott, J. C. (1992). Domination and the arts of resistance: Hidden transcripts (Reprint edition ed.). New Haven: Yale University Press. Simanjuntak, N. (2016). Penguatan lembaga adat sebagai alternatif penyelesaian sengketa. Negara Hukum: Membangun Hukum untuk Keadilan dan Kesejahteraan, 4(1), 35-66. doi:10.22212/jnh.v4i1.195 Steinebach, S. (2017). Farmers and pawns: The role of migrants in agrarian conflicts and rural resistance in Sumatra, Indonesia. Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology, 18(3), 228-245. doi:10.1080/14442213.2017.1304443 Susan, N. (2014). Laporan pengkajian hukum tentang peran pranata adat dalam pencegahan/penghentian konflik antara kelompok masyarakat. Diambil dari Jakarta: bpn.go.id Syawaludin, M. (2016). Perubahan struktur gerakan perlawanan petani Rengas. Tamaddun: Jurnal Kebudayaan dan Sastra Islam, 16(1), 46-60. Taib, R., Soetarto, E., & Tonny, F. (2010). Transformasi identitas gerakan dari “petani” menjadi “masyarakat adat”: Upaya memahami konflik pembangunan Bandara Sultan Babullah di Ternate Maluku Utara”. Sodality: Jurnal Sosiologi Pedesaan, 4(2). doi:10.22500/sodality.v4i2.5845

Download

Plum Print visual indicator of research metrics
PlumX Metrics
  • Citations
    • Citation Indexes: 1
  • Usage
    • Downloads: 37
    • Abstract Views: 13
  • Captures
    • Readers: 28
see details

Included in

Anthropology Commons

Share

COinS