•  
  •  
 

Antropologi Indonesia

Abstract

This research is based on the mindset that any of heterogeneous in a society, they still could be identified based on the values or symbols that referred to them as an ethnic groups. The problem in this research comes from seeing the issues of Lampung ethnic as an experienced local ethnic domination that increasingly being desperate in their own cultural environment. Ambiguity and vagueness of identity as a local ethnic also reinforced by the attitude of immigrants towards them that affect the relationship between them and if it still left unchecked can potentially lead to conflict. This ethnography research aims to reveal how Lampung ethnic establish their existence of identity through cultural values of Piil Pesenggiri, which upholds the dignity contextually as Lampung identity which carried out in their actions as a strategy of contestation in the immigrant communities. The emergence of a awareness of their identity, reviving Piil Pesenggiri uphold the values of honour in local wisdom become a strategy and a capital that being used when they are dialing with immigrants. In their actualization, the reproduction of Piil Pesenggri still being based on its own basic values such as Pesenggiri, nemui nyimah, nengah nyappor, juluk adok, dan sakai sambayan. Contextually, Piil Pesenggiri become a strategy to manifested their existence as Lampung ethnic and it also used to change the stereotype that immigrants pinned to them with a new value such as (a) changing the work ethic that has been known so low that they are often associated with lazy, less ductile, weak competitiveness, and human resources are still limited; (b) are not stuck with the romance of the past as a landlord; (c) re-interpretation of the titles of nobility (juluk buadek) which has been become the pride and purpose to be achieved in the internal structure so that could be received in the external structure; (d) Piil Pesenggiri become an ethnic identity and politics identity. Piil Pesenggiri is a way of life how ethnic Lampung have to act and behave. For them, Piil Pesenggiri is an identity or reflects the identity so that their existence is recognized and valued in relation to immigrants. In order to confirm their identity as Lampung ethnics, then the actions and strategies they are doing is building a network through the structure of society, also using the idiom of kinship as a strategy to deal with the migrants so that their existence as an ethnic Lampung still got appreciation in accordance with the values of honour that contained in Piil Pesenggiri.

References

Appadurai, Ajun (1991) ”Global Ethnoscapes: Notes and Queries for a Transnational Anthropology,” dalam Richard G. Fox, ed. Recapturing Anthropology. Working in the Present. Sante Fe, New Mexico: School of American Research Press. Hal.191-210. Barnard, Alan. 2000. History and Theory in Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Bahar, Safrudin. 1995.” Masalah Etnisitas dan Ketahanan Nasional:Risiko atau Potensi’, dalam Ichlasul Amal dan Armaidy Armawi, ed.,Sumbangan Ilmu Sosial terhadap Konsepsi Ketahanan Sosial, Yogyakarta:Gadjah Mada University Press. Barth, Fredrik. 1969. Ethnic Groups And Boundaries “The Social Organization of Culture Difference. Little Brown and Company Boston Bourdieu, Pierre 1977. OutLine Of A Theory Of Practice. Cambridge University Press 1979. Algeria 1960. Cambridge University Press 1984, Distinction: A Social Critique of The Judgement of Taste, translated oleh Richard Nice. Harvard University Press. Cambridge, massachusetts 2003. Bourdieu dalam Johnson, Randal (Ed). The Field of Cultural Production: Essay on Art and Literature. Castles, Stephen & Mark J.Miller. 2003. The Age of Migration: International Population movements in The Modern World. Third Edition Revised and Updates. Palgrave Macmilan Castells, Manuel 2010. The Power of Identity. Wiley-Blackwell Comaroff , John L& Jean Comaroff 2009. Ethnicity.Inc.The University of Chicago Press. Geertz, Clifford. 1983. Local Knowledge. Further Essays in Interpretive Anthropology. USA: Basic Books, Inc. Hadikusuma, Hilman. 1990. Masyarakat dan Adat Budaya Lampung. Bandung, Mandar Maju 1995. Hukum perkawinan Adat. Penerbit PT Citra Aditya Bakti Bandung Hall, Stuart. 1991. Culture, Globalization and The World-System: Contempory Conditions for The Representation of Identity. Edited by Anthony D. King. Houdmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire and London: MacMillan Education Ltd. Harker, Richard., Cheelen Mahar., Chris Wilkes 2009. Pengantar Paling Komprehensif Kepada Pemikiran Pierre Bourdieu. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Jala Sutra. Hobsbawm, Eric & Terence Ranger. 1992. The Invention of Tradition. Cambrige University Press. Horowitz, Donald. 1975. Dalam Glazer, Nathan and Daniel P. Moynihan (Ed). Ethnicity Theory and Experience. Harvard University Press Cambridge, Massachusetts, and London, England. Jenkins, Richard. 2004. Membaca Pikiran Pierre Bourdieu.Kreasi Wacana Yogyakarta. Katubi 2006. Menyoal Orang Lampung Dari Persfektif Bahasa Dan Etnisitas, dalam Masyarakat Indonesia: majalah Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial Jilid XXXII, No 1 Tahun 2006. Jakarta: Lembaga Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia. Marzuku, M.L. 1995. “Siri” Bagian Kesadaran Hukum Rakyat Bugis Makasar. Ujung Pandang: Hasanuddin University Press. Oommen. T.K 1997. Kewarganegaraan, Kebangsaan & Etnisitas. Diterjemahkan oleh Munabari Fahlesa . Bantul: Kreasi Wacana offset. Ortner Sherry B 2002. ‘Burned Like a Tattoo’ High School Social Categories and ‘American Culture’ London, Thousand Oaks, CA and New Delhi: SAGE Publications Vol 3(2): 115–148. Peacock, James L 2004. The Anthropology of Lens, Harsh Light, Soft Focus. Second Edition.Cambridge University Press. Rudyansjah Tony. 2009. Kekuasaan, Sejarah, dan Tindakan: Sebuah Kajian Tentang Landskap Budaya. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers PT Rajagrafindo Persada. Rutherford, Danilyn. 2000. The White Edge of The Margin: Textuality and Authority in Biak, Irian aya, Indonesia. American Ethnologist 27 92):312-339.Copyright (c) 2000, American Anthropological Association. Shahab, Yasmine Zaki. 2004. Identitas dan Otoritas, Rekonstruksi Tradisi Betawi.Laboratorium Antropologi FISIP UI Siagian, Hayaruddin 2000. Perimbangan Antar Etnik di Kota Bandar Lampung dalam Etnisitas dan Integrasi di Indonesia: Sebuah Bunga Rampai. Jakarta: Pusat penelitian dan Pengembangan Kemasyarakatan dan kebudayaan Lembaga Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia (PMB-LIPI). Thung Ju Lan., Dedi S. Adhuri., Achmad Fedyani Saifuddin 2004. The (Re) Construction Of The ‘Pan Dayak’ Identity in Kalimantan And Sarawak: A study on Minority’s Identity, Ethnicity and Nationality dalam Jurnal Masyarakat dan Budaya Tahun 2004. Jakarta: Lembaga Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia Pusat Penelitian Kemasyarakatan Dan Kebudayaa 2006. Klaim, Kontestasi & Konflik Identitas: Lokalitas vis-a’-vis Nasionalitas. Jakarta: Puslit. Kemasyarakatan dan Kebudayaan-LIPI 2006. Redefenisi Etnisitas dalam Konteks Kebudayaan Nasional, dalam Jurnal Masyarakat Indonesia Volume VIII No 1 Tahun 2006. Jakarta: Lembaga Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia Pusat Penelitian Kemasyarakatan Dan Kebudayaan Wiyata, Latief.A 2002. Carok; Konflik kekerasan dan Harga Diri Orang Madura. LKIS Pelangi Aksara, Yogyakarta

Download

Included in

Anthropology Commons

Share

COinS