Antropologi Indonesia
Abstract
This writing is to parse the context of history from Antonio Gramsci’s thoughts regarding the concept of hegemony and positioning that approach in the realm of anthropological studies. The author wants to position Gramsci's argument by outlining the opinions of the theory interpreters and explaining social and political context from the influences of Marxism and communism on Gramsci's thinking. The fundamental concept of Gramschi’s thinking according to the auhor has influenced how post-1970s anthropology conceptualizes ideology, consent and hegemony as key issues that make the concept of culture become more operational in discussing matters of power.
References
Abu-Lughod, Lila (1991), Writing Against Culture, dalam Ricard G. Fox, Ed., “Recapturing Anthropology, Working in The Present”, Santa Fe, New Mexico: School of American Research Press. Agger, Ben (2006), Teori Sosial Kritis: Kritik, Penerapan, dan Implikasinya, Jogjakarta: LKPM. Bacock, Robert (tth.), Pengantar Komprehenshif dalam Memahami Hegemoni, Jogjakarta: Jalasutra. Borofsky, Robert, ed. (1994), Assessing Cultural Anthropology, New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc. Cervone, Emma (2007), Building Engangement: Ethnography and Indigenous Communities Today, dalam “Transforming Anthropology” 15 (2). Crehan, Kate (2002), Gramsci, Culture, and Anthropology, Virginia: Pluto Press. Davidson, Alastair, Antonio Gramsci, dalam Social Theory: A Guide to Central Thinker, Peter Beilharz, Australia: Allen & Unwin Pty. Fox, Ricard G. Ed. (1991), Recapturing Anthropology, Working in The Present, Santa Fe, New Mexico: School of American Research Press. Jones, Pip (2009), Pengantar Teori-teori Sosial: Dari Fungsionalisme hingga Postmodernisme, Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia. Lukacs, George (2010), Dialektika Marxis: Sejarah dan Kesadaran Kelas, Jogjakarta: Ar Ruz Media. Keesing, Roger M. (1994), Theories of Cultural Revisited, dalam Robert Borofsky, ed., “Assessing Cultural Anthropology”, New York: McGraw- Hill, Inc.
22 | Teori Hegemoni Gramsci Maliki, Zainuddin (2004), Narasi Agung: Tiga Teori Sosial Hegemonik, Surabaya: LPAM Maanen, John Van (2006), Ethnography Then and Now, dalam “Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal” 1 (1): 13-21. Olwig, Karen F. (1997), Cultural Sites: Sustaining a Home in a Deterritorialized World, dalam Karen F. Olwig & Kirsten Hastrup, eds., “Sitting Culture. The Shifting Anthropological Object”, London & New Yor: Routledge. Olwig, Karen F., & Kirsten Hastrup, eds. (1997), Sitting Culture. The Shifting Anthropological Object, London & New Yor: Routledge. Ritzer, George & Douglas J. Goodman (2003), Modern Sociological Theory, New York: McGraw-Hill. Rudyansjah, Tony (2011), Alam, Kebudayaan, dan Yang Ilahi: Turunan, Percabangan, dan Pengingkaran dalam Teori Sosial Budaya, Depok: Titian Budaya dan Departemen Antropologi FISIP UI. Saifuddin, Ahmad Fedyani (2006), Antropologi Kontemporer: Suatu Pengantar Kritis Mengenai Paradigma, Jakarta: Kencana. Williams, Raymond (1977), Marxism and Literature, New York: Oxford University Press.
Recommended Citation
Fariyah, Iklilah Muzayyanah Dini
(2011)
"Hegemoni Antonio Gramsci: Sejarah dan Perkembangannya dalam Ranah Antropologi,"
Antropologi Indonesia: Vol. 32:
Iss.
2, Article 2.
DOI: 10.7454/ai.v32i2.2115
Available at:
https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/jai/vol32/iss2/2