Abstract
"Has any woman ever designed architectures in the past centuries? You may ask her to design a hut, not even a temple! She can't. She is foreign to architecture." These infamous words of Benito Mussolini (1927) reflected the widespread sexism of the Fascist regime and prompted a silent wave of dissent pioneered by women intellectuals, architects, writers, and journalists in the early 20th century. They advocated for a valuable feminine contribution to Italian architecture and their story is still partially unknown by architectural historians today. This essay tackles Italian women's spatial design and aesthetics during the regime, a period in which they kept silently operating within the built environment as professional architects with unbuilt projects and as amateur designers inside their homes. These circumstances, as argued here, determined the emergence of a feminine and feminist approach to architectural design and criticism that transcended the male boundaries of high culture, reinforced by the Fascist regime and in line with the modernist binary understanding of taste and cultural architectural production. The latter is studied through the lens of cultural domesticity, a theoretical framework that merges cultural sociology, feminism, and architecture. By focusing on Italian women's lived experiences and unconventional design approaches, this study ultimately looks at the consolidation of feminine aesthetics and how it informed women's spatial design as it keeps challenging the boundaries of architectural history.
Publication Date
1-29-2024
References
Asquer, E. (2011). Storia intima dei ceti medi: Una capitale e una periferia nell'Italia del miracolo economico [Intimate history of the middle classes: A capital and a suburb in the Italy of the economic miracle]. Editori Laterza.
Attfield, J. (1989). FORM/female FOLLOWS FUNCTION/male: Feminist critiques of design. In J. A. Walker (Ed.), Design history and the history of design (pp. 199–225). Pluto Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt18mvngc.15
Attfield, J., & Kirkham, P. (1989). A view from the interior: Feminism, women, design. Women's Press.
Balbo, L. (1978). La doppia presenza [The double presence]. Inchiesta,32, 3–6.
Barazzetti, D. (2006). Doppia presenza e lavoro di cura: Interrogativi su alcune categorie interpretative [Double presence and care work: Questions on some interpretative categories]. Quaderni di Sociologia, 40, 85–96. https://doi.org/10.4000/qds.995
Benito Mussolini. (2021, January 4). In Wikiquote. https://it.wikiquote.org/wiki/Benito_Mussolini
Brin, I. (1944). Usi e costumi [Customs and traditions] (1920-1944). De Luigi.
Casciato, M. (1988). L'abitazione e gli spazi domestici [The home and domestic spaces]. In P. Melograni (Ed.), La famiglia italiana dall'Ottocento a oggi (pp. 525–588). Editori Laterza.
Cooper, M. (2017). Family values: Between neoliberalism and the new social conservatism. Zone Books.
Cosseta, K. (2000). Ragione e sentimento dell'abitare: La casa e l'architettura nel pensiero femminile tra le due guerre [Reason and feeling of dwelling: The house and architecture in female thought between the two wars]. Franco Angeli.
Douglas, M. (1982). The world of goods. W. W. Norton & Co.
Elias, N. (1998). The Kitsch style and the age of kitsch. In J. Goudsblom, & S. Mennel (Eds.), The Norbert Elias reader (pp. 27–29). Blackwell. (Original work published 1935)
Forlini, F. R. (2021). Salotto buono: The "art of conservation" and the permanence of an Italian room. Interiors, 11(2–3), 157–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/20419112.2021.1942616
Fowler, B., & Wilson, F. (2004). Women architects and their discontents. Sociology, 38(1), 101–119. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038504039363
Hartman, H. I. (1981). Women and revolution: A discussion of the unhappy marriage of Marxism and feminism. South End Press.
Heynen, H. (2012). Genius, gender and architecture: The star system as exemplified in the Pritzker Prize. Architectural Theory Review, 17(2–3), 331–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/13264826.2012.727443
Morelli, L. (1933). La casa che vorrei avere [The house I'd like to have]. Hoepli.
Pilkey, B., Scicluna, R. M., Campkin, B., & Penner, B. (2017). Sexuality and gender at home: Experience, politics, transgression. Bloomsbury Academic.
Rendell, J. (2012). Tendencies and trajectories: Feminist approaches in architecture. In S. Cairns, G. Crysler, H. Heynen, & G. Wright (Eds.), Architectural theory handbook (pp. 85–97). Sage.
Salvati, M. (1993). L'Inutile salotto: L'Abitazione piccolo-borghese nell'Italia fascista [The useless living room: Lower-middle-class housing in fascist Italy]. Bollati Boringhieri.
Sparke, P. (2010). As long as it's pink: The sexual politics of taste. Press of the Nova Scotia College of Art and Design. (Original work published 1995)
Speckel, A. M. (1935). Architettura moderna e donne in architettura [Modern architecture and woman architecture]. Almanacco della Donna Italiana, 13,120–134.
Wigley, M. (1992). Untitled: The housing of gender. In B. Colomina & J. Bloomer (Eds.), Sexuality & space (pp. 327–389). Princeton University Press.
Submitted Date
2023-07-01
Accepted Date
2023-12-09
First Page
41
Last Page
60
Recommended Citation
Forlini, F. R. (2024). The House I'd Like to Have: Women's Spatial Cultures, Design, and Aesthetic in 20th Century Italy. Interiority, 7 (1), 41-60. https://doi.org/10.7454/in.v7i1.359
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Author(s) retain the copyright of articles published in this journal, with first publication rights granted to Interiority.
