•  
  •  
 

Abstract

This paper expands the theoretical understanding of building layers proposed by Brand (1995) by investigating changes in the domestic environment during the COVID-19 pandemic. Brand’s layer framework breaks a built environment into “shearing layers” to examine its adaptation processes. This paper argues that ways of managing the risk of virus transmission in the built environment redefine the understanding of these layers. This paper takes the perspective of interiority to address these layers as instruments with the spatial qualities required of a resilient domestic environment. The study unpacks the theory of Brand’s layer framework, proposing the principles by which layers adapt to protect the domestic environment during the COVID-19 pandemic. It then offers readings on the occurrence of change in the domestic environment in which such adaptation principles are performed. Such occurrences consist of intensifying layer changes to assist intense uses, merge between layers to assist movements, the construction of new layer forms, and reconfiguration of multiple layers for a prolonged change. Apart from redefining the very understanding of layers, this paper addresses how spatial change is not driven only by physical deterioration, but also by the performative creation of scenarios to protect the domestic environment during the pandemic.

Publication Date

7-30-2020

References

Adams, R., & Marlor, R. (2019). Breaking the binary oppositions of the interior: A momentary permanence. Interiority, 2(2), 113–128. https://doi.org/10.7454/in.v2i2.58

Alexander, C. (1975). The Oregon experiment. New York: Oxford University Press.

Alexander, C. (1979). The timeless way of building. New York: Oxford University Press.

Attiwill, S. (2012). Beyond building: Interior designs. Perth: Curtin University.

Banham, R. (1984). The Architecture of the well-tempered environment (2nd ed). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Bloomfield, S. F., Exner, M., Signorelli, C., Nath, K. J., & Scott, E. A. (2012). The chain of infection transmission in the home and everyday life settings, and the role of hygiene in reducing the risk of infection. International Scientific Forum on Home Hygiene. https://www.ifh-homehygiene.org/review/chain-infection-transmission-home-and-everyday-life-settings-and-role-hygiene-reducing-risk

Brand, S. (1995). How buildings learn: What happens after they’re built. New York: Penguin Books.

de Certeau, M. (1984). The practice of everyday life, (S. Rendall, Trans.). Berkeley: University of California. (Original work published 1974).

Dietz, L., Horve, P. F., Coil, D. A., Fretz, M., Eisen, J. A., & Van Den Wymelenberg, K. (2020). 2019 Novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic: Built environment considerations to reduce transmission. MSystems, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.1128/mSystems.00245-20

Duan, S. M., Zhao, X.S., Wen, R.F., Huang, J.J., Pi, G.H., Zhang, S. X., Han, J., Bi, S. L., Ruan, L., Dong, X. P., & SARS Research Team. (2003). Stability of SARS coronavirus in human specimens and environment and its sensitivity to heating and UV irradiation. Biomedical and Environmental Sciences: BES, 16(3), 246–255. PMID: 14631830

Duffy, F. (1990). Measuring building performance. Facilities, 8(5), 17–20. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000002112

Franck, K. A., & Lepori, R. B. (2000). Architecture inside out. Chichester: Wiley.

Friedberg, A. (2006). The virtual window: From Alberti to Microsoft. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Handa, R. (2015). Allure of the incomplete, imperfect, and impermanent: Designing and appreciating architecture as nature. New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.

Klasto, C. (2019). Tokyo’s kyōshō jūtaku: Nature through the inside, outside and the in-between. Interiority, 2(2), 155–176. https://doi.org/10.7454/in.v2i2.63

Leatherbarrow, D. (2002). Uncommon ground: Architecture, technology, and topography. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Leatherbarrow, D., & Mostafavi, M. (2002). Surface architecture. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Lens, K., & Van Cleempoel, K. (2015). Monasteries – The layered capture of rhythm in space and time through rituals by ‘moulage.’ Interiors, 6(3), 289–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/20419112.2015.1125626

Marinic, G. (2018). The interior architecture theory reader. New York: Routledge.

Martinelli, P. M. (2019). House, street, city: Le Corbusier’s research towards a new urban interior. Interiority, 2(2), 129–153. https://doi.org/10.7454/in.v2i2.57

Schneider, T., & Till, J. (2007). Flexible housing. New York: Architectural Press, Routledge.

Till, J. (2013). Architecture depends. Cambridge: MIT Press.

van Doremalen, N., Bushmaker, T., Morris, D. H., Holbrook, M. G., Gamble, A., Williamson, B. N., Tamin, A., Harcourt, J. L., Thornburg, N. J., Gerber, S. I., Lloyd-Smith, J. O., de Wit, E., & Munster, V. J. (2020). Aerosol and surface stability of SARS-CoV-2 as compared with SARS-CoV-1. New England Journal of Medicine, 382(16), 1564–1567. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc2004973

Wang, Y., Di, Y., Ye, J., & Wei, W. (2020). Study on the public psychological states and its related factors during the outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in some regions of china. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2020.1746817

Warakanyaka, A. A. A. S., & Yatmo, Y. A. (2018). Understanding the importance of time in interior architectural design method. SHS Web of Conferences, 41, 04009. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20184104009

Warakanyaka, A. A. A. S., & Yatmo, Y. A. (2018). Tracing the progression of inhabitation through interior surface in Semarang Old Town. Interiority, 1(1), 64–78. https://doi.org/10.7454/in.v1i1.9

Weinthal, L. (2011). Toward a new interior: An anthology of interior design theory. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.

WHO. (2020). Advice on the use of masks in the context of COVID-19: Interim guidance, 6 April 2020. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/331693

Yatmo, Y. A., Atmodiwirjo, P., & Harahap, M. M. Y. (2020). Hand touches on the surfaces of a healthcare waiting area. Journal of Hospital Infection, 105(2), 383–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2020.04.042

Yatmo, Y. A., Putra, N., Harahap, M. M. Y., & Saginatari, D. P. (2018). Evaluation of spatial layout in health care waiting areas based on simulation of droplet movement trace. International Journal of Technology, 9(5), 888–897. https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v9i5.2106

Submitted Date

2020-06-28

Accepted Date

2020-07-29

First Page

185

Last Page

200

Authors' Bio

Afifah Karimah
afifahkar@ui.ac.id

Afifah Karimah is a part-time lecturer and researcher in Department of Architecture, Universitas Indonesia. After obtaining her Master’s degree in Architectural Design at the same department in 2018, she has been involved in several research projects in Architectural Design Research Cluster Universitas Indonesia. She is interested in the process of spatial design in architecture, especially on how the understanding of micro components could be integrated within the processes of architectural design and learning.

Kristanti Dewi Paramita
kristanti.dewi@ui.ac.id

Kristanti teaches architecture in Universitas Indonesia since 2010 before appointed full-time lecturer in 2012. She completed her MA and PhD by Design in School of Architecture at University of Sheffield, UK. Her current research takes particular interest in situated knowledge produced by spatial and material practice, understanding how such knowledge shapes architectural design methods. She has worked extensively in action research projects and educational environment design, developing design models of both domestic and civic spaces and constructing them together with a variety of stakeholders, from disaster impacted community, autistic children, local kampung dwellers, to public school institutions.

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Author(s) retain the copyright of articles published in this journal, with first publication rights granted to Interiority.

Share

COinS