•  
  •  
 

Abstract

This paper examines the long-term likelihood of a US-China war, particularly in light of Donald Trump's US presidential win. The two nations have consistently experienced strained relations and intense rivalry, especially throughout the Trump and Biden presidencies. Both leaders are worried about China's growing assertiveness. While these nations are still battling over trade, this situation could easily escalate into an armed conflict later on. Due to China's increasing economic power and America's reduced influence in specific areas, there are predictions of a change in how the world is governed. This paper examines the question of whether China will become a force for change in the current international system or choose to adhere to the existing U.S.-led order and concludes that it is not a simple choice between the two, because China might selectively change parts of the system while also accepting U.S. leadership in some areas. Employing both Kenneth Waltz's neo-realist theory and the principles of Morgenthau's realism, this paper aims to analyse the ever-present likelihood of war within an anarchic global environment. At present, the two nations have a strained relationship, and it is probable that they will keep trying to prevent the other from attacking. The research, echoing Waltz's perspective, indicated that the potential for war is ever-present in a world without central authority; however, nuclear arms have curtailed that threat. Unfortunately, Trump's return has caused the US to embrace protectionist trade policies and adopt a more severe approach to international relations. This has once again raised concerns about whether a war between China and the US remains inevitable.

Bahasa Abstract

Studi ini mengkaji kemungkinan jangka panjang terjadinya perang AS-Tiongkok, khususnya mengingat kemenangan Donald Trump dalam pemilihan presiden AS. Kedua negara secara konsisten mengalami hubungan yang tegang dan persaingan yang intens, terutama selama masa kepresidenan Trump dan Biden. Kedua pemimpin khawatir tentang meningkatnya sikap agresif Tiongkok. Meskipun kedua negara ini masih berselisih mengenai perdagangan, situasi ini dapat dengan mudah meningkat menjadi konflik bersenjata di kemudian hari. Karena meningkatnya kekuatan ekonomi Tiongkok dan berkurangnya pengaruh Amerika di bidang-bidang tertentu, ada prediksi tentang perubahan dalam cara dunia diatur. Artikel ini mengkaji pertanyaan apakah Tiongkok akan menjadi kekuatan perubahan dalam sistem internasional saat ini atau memilih untuk tetap berpegang pada tatanan yang dipimpin AS yang ada dan menyimpulkan bahwa itu bukanlah pilihan sederhana antara keduanya, karena Tiongkok mungkin secara selektif mengubah bagian-bagian dari sistem sambil juga menerima kepemimpinan AS di beberapa bidang. Dengan menggunakan teori neo-realis Kenneth Waltz dan prinsip-prinsip realisme Morgenthau, makalah ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kemungkinan perang yang selalu ada dalam lingkungan global yang anarkis. Saat ini, kedua negara memiliki hubungan yang tegang, dan kemungkinan besar mereka akan terus berusaha mencegah satu sama lain untuk menyerang.

References

Ali, Idrees, & Stewart, Phil. (2022). China likely to have 1,500 nuclear warheads by 2035: Pentagon. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/world/china-likely-have-1500-nuclear-warheads-by-2035-pentagon-2022-11-29/

Al-Jazeera. (2022). China slams Nancy Pelosi’s Taiwan visit as ‘extremely dangerous’. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2022/8/2/china-slams-pelosis-taiwan-visit-extremely-dangerous

BBC News Indonesia. (2013). Perang Irak dalam Angka (Iraq War in Numbers).  https://www.bbc.com/indonesia/laporan_khusus/2013/02/130216_irak_statistik

Bell, Duncan. (2025). Neorealism in International Relations. Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/topic/realism-political-and-social-science/Neorealism-in-international-relations

Brown, Clayton D. (2012). China’s Great Leap Forward.  Association for Asian Studies. Volume 17:3 (Winter): US, Asia, and the World: 1914–2012.

Business-Standard. (2022). US trying to create Asian NATO with blocs to 'suppress' China: FM Wang Yi. https://www.business-standard.com/article/international/us-trying-to-create-asian-nato-with-blocs-to-suppress-china-fm-wang-yi-122030701343_1.html

CGTN. (n.d.). What does 'path of socialism with Chinese characteristics' mean?, https://www.cgtn.com/how-china-works/feature/What-does-path-of-socialism-with-Chinese-characteristics-mean.html.

Chan, Lai-Ha. (2017). The AIIB and China's Soft Balancing Against the US Pivot to Asia. Australian Institute of International Affairs. https://www.internationalaffairs.org.au/australianoutlook/aiia-balancing-us-pivot-asia-rationale/

Chatzky, A., & McBride, J. (2020). China’s Massive Belt and Road Initiative. Council on Foreign Relations.

Chen, X., You, X., & Chang, V. (2021). FinTech and commercial banks’ performance in China: A leap forward or survival of the fittest? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 166, 120645.

Clegg, Jenny. (2022). As the US forces NATO into Asia, countries don’t want to choose sides. Global Times. https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202207/1271198.shtml

CNN Indonesia. (2020). Kronologi Perang Dagang AS-China Selama Kepemimpinan Trump (Chronology of the US-China Trade War During Trump's Leadership). https://www.cnnindonesia.com/ekonomi/20201103154223-92-565387/kronologi-perang-dagang-as-china-selama-kepemimpinan-trump

CNN Indonesia. (2022). China Geram ke AS soal Lawatan Pelosi: Yang Bermain Api Akan Binasa (China is furious at the US about Pelosi's visit: Those who play with fire will perish). https://www.cnnindonesia.com/internasional/20220803071840-113-829527/china-geram-ke-as-soal-lawatan-pelosi-yang-bermain-api-akan-binasa

Coopers-PwC, P. (2017). The World in 2050: The Long View, How will the global economic order change by 2050.

Creswell, John W. (2014). Research Design: Pendekatan Metode Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Campuran. Penerbit Pustaka Pelajar.

Dwibala, Gerrardus Evam. (2022). Visi Ideologi Negara Republik Rakyat Cina (State Ideological Vision of the People's Republic of China). Cogito. https://lsfcogito.org/visi-ideologi-negara-republik-rakyat-cina/

Embassy of the People's Republic of China in Indonesia. (2022). Genocide in Xinjiang a Complete ‘Lie of the Century’——Reality Check II: Falsehoods in US Perceptions of China.  http://id.china-embassy.gov.cn/eng/sgdt/202206/t20220622_10707637.htm

Febrian, Ramdan., & Mahabarata, Yudhistira. (2020). Dimulainya Invasi Amerika Serikat ke Irak (Beginning of the United States Invasion of Iraq). VOI. https://voi.id/memori/3848/dimulainya-invasi-amerika-serikat-ke-irak

Gady, Franz-Stefan. (2017). US Starts Deploying THAAD Anti-Missile Defense System in South Korea. The Diplomat. https://thediplomat.com/2017/03/us-starts-deploying-thaad-anti-missile-defense-system-in-south-korea/

Goldstein, A. (2020). US–China Rivalry in the twenty-first century: Déjà vu and Cold War II. China International Strategy Review, 2 (1), 48–62.

Grant, Richard L. (1995). Political and Economic Reform in China. The World Today, Vol. 51, No. 2. (Feb): 37.

Guangyuan, Liu. (2022). China is committed to peace in South China Sea despite US

https://id.usembassy.gov/wp-content/uploads/sites/162/2024/05/U.S.-Indo-Pacific-Strategy_id.pdf

Ikenberry, G. John., Mastanduno, Michael, & Wohlforth, William C. (2009). Unipolarity, State Behavior, and Systemic Consequences. World Politics, Vol. 61, No. 1.

International Monetary Fund. (2023). IMF Members’ Quotas and Voting Power, and IMF Board of Governors. IMF Report.

Ismi, Asad. (2014). BRICS and the SCO challenge U.S. global dominance. Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives. https://policyalternatives.ca/publications/monitor/brics-and-sco-challenge-us-global-dominance or https://yourworldnews.org/blog/?p=4420 

Jackson, Robert, & Sorensen, Georg. (2013). Pengantar Studi Hubungan Internasional: Teori dan Pendekatan. Pustaka Pelajar.

Kirton, J., & Larionova, M. (2022). Contagious convergent cumulative cooperation: The dynamic development of the G20, BRICS and SCO. International Politics, 1–29.

Koukoudakis, G. (2022). A Defence of the Relevance of Neorealism in the Post-Bipolar World. Irish Studies in International Affairs, 33 (1), 11–26.

Li, X. (2021). The rise of China and its impact on world economic stratification and re-stratification. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 34 (4), 530–550.

Mahbubani, Kishore. (2020). The West Should Heed Napoleon’s Advice and Let China Sleep. Financial Times. https://www.ft.com/content/1948448c-d5c8-4e3d-8e40-a670e69235c8

Maizland, L. (2022). India’s Muslims: An increasingly marginalized population. Council on Foreign Relations, 20, 21.

Mearsheimer, J. J. (2001). The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. W. W. Nanon & Company, Inc.

Mearsheimer, J. J. (2019). Bound to Fail: The Rise and Fall of the Liberal International Order. International Security, 43(4), 7–50. https://doi.org/10.1162/isec_a_00342

Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People’s Republic of China. Nixon's China Visit and ‘Sino-U.S. Joint Communiqué’. https://www.mfa.gov.cn/mfa_eng/zy/wjls/3604_665547/202405/t20240531_11367541.html

Morgenthau, Hans J. (1993). Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace (Brief Edition), Revised by Kenneth W. Thompson. McGraw-Hill, Inc.

Morrison, W. M. (2019). China’s economic rise: History, trends, challenges, and implications for the United States. Congressional Research Service. https://sgp.fas.org/crs/row/RL33534.pdf

Nye, J. S. (2023). The rise of China’s soft power. In Soft Power and Great-Power Competition: Shifting Sands in the Balance of Power Between the United States and China (pp. 97–99). Springer.

provocations. South China Morning Post. http://hk.ocmfa.gov.cn/eng/zydt/202202/t20220216_10642683.htm

Ray, Michael. (2018, July 11). Why Did the Soviet Union Collapse?. Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/story/why-did-the-soviet-union-collapse

Reuters., & The Associated Press. (2021, April 20). Chinese President Xi Jinping criticizes world 'hegemony' in jab at U.S. NBC News. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/asia/chinese-president-xi-jinping-criticizes-world-hegemony-jab-u-s-n1264608

Scobell, Andrew, &  Lucy Stevenson-Yang, Lucy. (2022). China Is Not Russia. Taiwan Is Not Ukraine. United States Institute of Peace. https://www.usip.org/publications/2022/03/china-not-russia-taiwan-not-ukraine

Sheng, Y., & Qingqing, C. (2021, December 26). Lesson of Soviet Union’s collapse ‘helps China develop socialism successfully’. Global Times. https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202112/1243430.shtml

Smith, David. (2021). We did what we came here to do': Trump fails to mention Biden in farewell address. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/jan/19/donald-trump-farewell-address-joe-biden

Sorongan, Tommy Patrio. (2022). Kim Jong Un Tantang AS, Ini Kekuatan Nuklir Korea Utara (Kim Jong Un Challenges US, This is North Korea's Nuclear Power). CNBC Indonesia. https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/news/20220729155038-4-359679/kim-jong-un-tantang-as-ini-kekuatan-nuklir-korea-utara

Stephen, M. D. (2020). China’s New Multilateral Institutions: A Framework and Research Agenda. Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (WZB), Discussion Paper, No. SP IV 2020-102.

The White House. (2022). Strategi Indo-Pasifik. Kedutaan Besar Amerika untuk Indonesia.

Vestergaard, J., & Wade, R. H. (2014). Out of the woods: Gridlock in the IMF, and the World Bank puts multilateralism at risk (Issue 2014: 06). DIIS Report.

VOA. (2022). Aksi Protes atas Kekalahan Bolsonaro dalam Pilpres Brazil Meningkat (Protests over Bolsonaro's defeat in Brazil's presidential election are increasing). https://www.voaindonesia.com/a/aksi-protes-atas-kekalahan-bolsonaro-dalam-pilpres-brazil-meningkat/6815869.html

Waltz, K.N. (1979). Theory of International Politics. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.

Waltz, K.N. (1988). The Origins of War in Neorealist Theory. The Journal of Interdisciplinary History Vol. 18, No. 4, The Origin and Prevention of Major Wars (Spring).

Wang, J. (2020). How Do National Election Outcomes Affect International Relations? A Case Study of Taiwan, China, and the United States.

Zhao, S. (2022). The US–China rivalry in the emerging bipolar world: Hostility, alignment, and power balance. Journal of Contemporary China, 31(134), 169–185.

Share

COinS