•  
  •  
 

Abstract

The international community encourages states to embrace the international cooperation to support and assist each other in reducing risks stemming from the digital divide. However, they cannot agree upon how international norms apply to cyberspace, let alone shaping and regulating international cybersecurity capacity building (CCB) assistance. States use international CCB assistance to impose cyber-norms based on their perceptions. It results in different forms of assistance provided by each donor country. Using social constructivism theory and the CCB concept as international assistance, this paper compares the practice of CCB assistance from two donor countries: Japan and South Korea. It emphasises the role of each donor country’s normative structure in shaping their identities, roles, interests, and behaviours in international CCB assistance. Japan’s international cybersecurity cooperation normative structure shapes Japan’s identities and roles that prioritise security-dominant normative and material interests. Meanwhile, South Korea’s developmental focus constructs the country’s identities and roles that shape developmental normative and material interests. This research finds that Japan’s assistance is highly security-oriented while South Korea’s is less security-oriented. Their differences highlight the fragmentation of global cyber-norms caused by different perception processes.

References

ACU Project. (2012). History. Retrieved April 19, 2021, from ACU Project: https://web.archive.org/web/20130409112925/http://aseancu.org/about/history.jsp

AJCCBC. (2018). ASEAN-Japan Cybersecurity Capacity Building Centre. Retrieved April 18, 2021, from https://www.ajccbc.org/

ASEAN. (2016, October 20). CIIP Guidelines Ver. 3.0. Retrieved April 18, 2021, from https://asean.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/01-CIIP-Guidelines-Ver3.0.pdf

Bartlett, B. G. (2018). Institutional Determinants of Cyber Security Promotion Policies: Lessons from Japan, the U.S., and South Korea. Berkeley: Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley.

Calandro, E., & Berglund, N. (2019). Unpacking Cyber-Capacity Building in Shaping Cyberspace Governance: the SADC case. Retrieved January 26, 2021, from https://researchictafrica.net/wp/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/33_Calandro_Berglund_Unpacking-Cyber-Capacity-Building-1.pdf

Chen, W., & Wellman, B. (2004). The Global Digital Divide - Within and Between Countries. IT & Society, 1(7), 18-25.

Contreras, B., & Barrett, K.-A. (2020). Challenges in building regional capacities in cybersecurity: a regional organizational reflection. In E. Tikk, & M. Kerttunen (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of International Cybersecurity (pp. 211-214). London: Routledge.

Council of Europe. (2001, November 23). Convention on Cybercrime. Retrieved April 10, 2021, from Council of Europe: https://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/0900001680081561

Council of Europe. (2021). Parties/Observers to the Budapest Convention and Observer Organisations to the T-CY. Retrieved February 19, 2021, from https://www.coe.int/en/web/cybercrime/parties-observers

Crespo, L., Wanner, B., & Ghernaouti, S. (2018). Cybersecurity Capacity Building: A Swiss Approach. In M. Bartsch, & S. Frey (Eds.), Cybersecurity Best Practices: Lösungen zur Erhöhung der Cyberresilienz für Unternehmen und Behörden (pp. 525-538). Cham: Springer.

Creswell, J. D. (2013). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publication.

della Porta, D. (2008). Comparative Analysis: Case-Oriented versus Variable-Oriented Research. In D. Della Porta, & M. Keating, Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Science: A Pluralist Perspective (pp. 198-222). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Easley, L.-E., & Park, K. (2017). South Korea’s mismatched diplomacy in Asia: middle power identity, interests, and foreign policy. International Politics, 55(2), 242-263.

Ebert, H., & Groenendaal, L. (2020). Cyber Resilience and Diplomacy in the Republic of Korea: Prospects for EU Cooperation. Paris: EU Cyber Diplomacy and Resilience Clusters.

Embassy of the Republic of Korea for the Republic of Indonesia. (2011, June 1). Peresmian Balai Pelatihan dan Pengembangan Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi(Korea-Indonesia ICT Training Center). Retrieved April 19, 2021, from Kedutaan Besar Republik Korea untuk Republik Indonesia: https://overseas.mofa.go.kr/id-id/brd/m_2707/view.do?seq=659019&srchFr=&%3BsrchTo=&%3BsrchWord=&%3BsrchTp=&%3Bmulti_itm_seq=0&%3Bitm_seq_1=0&%3Bitm_seq_2=0&%3Bcompany_cd=&%3Bcompany_nm=&page=34

Finnemore, M., & Hollis, D. B. (2016). Constructing Norms for Global Cybersecurity. The American Journal of International Law, 110(3), 425-479.

Flamm, P. (2019). South Korean Identity and Global Foreign Policy: Dream of Autonomy. New York: Routledge.

GCSCC. (2021). Cybersecurity Capacity Maturity Model for Nations (CMM). Oxford: Global Cyber Security Capacity Centre.

GFCE. (2016). Preventing and Combating Cybercrime in Southeast Asia. Retrieved April 18, 2021, from GFCE: https://thegfce.org/initiatives/preventing-and-combating-cybercrime-in-southeast-asia/

Grigsby, A. (2017). The End of Cyber Norms. Survival, 59(6), 109-122.

Hagström, L., & Gustafsson, K. (2015). Japan and identity change: why it matters in International Relations. The Pacific Review, 28(1), 2.

Hansen, L., & Nissenbaum, H. (2009). Digital Disaster, Cyber Security, and the Copenhagen School. International Studies Quarterly, 53(4), 1155-1175.

Henriksen, A. (2019). The End of the Road for The UN GGE Process: The Future Regulation of Cyberspace. Journal of Cybersecurity, 5(1), 1-9.

Hermanns, H. (2013). National Role Conceptions in the ‘Global Korea’ Foreign Policy Strategy. The Korean Journal of International Studies, 11(1), 55-82.

Hitchens, T., & Goren, N. (2017). International Cybersecurity Information Sharing Agreements. College Park: Center for International & Security Studies, University of Maryland.

Hobson, J. M. (2000). The State and International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hohmann, M., & Pirang, A. (2017, April 12). Why Policymakers Should Care About Weak Digital Infrastructure Abroad. Retrieved from Council on Foreign Relations: https://www.cfr.org/blog/why-policymakers-should-care-about-weak-digital-infrastructure-abroad

Hohmann, M., Pirang, A., & Benner, T. (2017). Advancing Cybersecurity Capacity: Implementing a Principle-Based Approach. Berlin: Global Public Policy Institute.

Homburger, Z. (2019). The Necessity and Pitfall of Cybersecurity Capacity Building for Norm Development in Cyberspace. Global Society, 224-242.

Hurwitz, R. (2014). The Play of States: Norms and Security in Cyberspace. American Foreign Policy Interests: The Journal of the National Committee on American Foreign Policy, 36(5), 322-331.

ICT4Peace. (2018, November 15). International Cyber Security Capacity Building Program: Promoting Openness, Prosperity, Trust and Security in Cyberspace. Retrieved April 18, 2021, from https://ict4peace.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Cybersecurity-Policy-and-Diplomacy-Capacity-Building-15-Nov-2018.pdf

ID-SIRTII/CC. (2017, December 9). Regional Security Awareness JICA. Retrieved April 18, 2021, from ID-SIRTII/CC: https://idsirtii.or.id/kegiatan/detail_nama/multilateral_cooperation/53/regional-security-awareness-jica.html

Ingram, G. (2020, December 15). Development in Southeast Asia: Opportunities for donor collaboration. Retrieved April 24, 2021, from Brookings: https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Development-Southeast-Asia-Ch2-Digital.pdf

INTERPOL. (2018, July). ASEAN Cybercrime Operations Desk. Retrieved April 18, 2021, from INTERPOL: https://www.interpol.int/en/Crimes/Cybercrime/Cybercrime-operations/ASEAN-Cybercrime-Operations-Desk

INTERPOL. (2020, February 11). Korea to fund INTERPOL projects combating cyber-enabled crime. Retrieved April 19, 2021, from INTERPOL: https://www.interpol.int/en/News-and-Events/News/2020/Korea-to-fund-INTERPOL-projects-combating-cyber-enabled-crime

ITU. (2018, February 12). How the Republic of Korea became a world ICT leader. Retrieved April 14, 2021, from ITU: https://news.itu.int/republic-korea-leader-information-communication-technologies/

ITU. (2019a). Global Cybersecurity Index (GCI) 2018. Geneva: ITU Publications.

ITU. (2019b). Measuring digital development: Facts and figures 2019. Geneva: ITU Publications.

ITU. (2020, November). Key ICT indicators for developed and developing countries, the world and special regions (totals and penetration rates). Retrieved Feburary 11, 2021, from https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Documents/facts/ITU_regional_global_Key_ICT_indicator_aggregates_Nov_2020.xlsx

ITU. (2021). Mandate. Retrieved April 10, 2021, from ITU: https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Cybersecurity/Pages/about-cybersecurity.aspx

JAIF. (2018, July 2). ASEAN-Japan Cybersecurity Capacity Building Centre (Step 2). Retrieved April 18, 2021, from Japan-ASEAN Integration Fund: https://jaif.asean.org/project-brief/asean-japan-cybersecurity-capacity-building-centre-step-2/

Jamrisko, M., & Wei, L. (2020, January 18). Germany Breaks Korea’s Six-Year Streak as Most Innovative Nation. Retrieved April 13, 2021, from Bloomberg: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-01-18/germany-breaks-korea-s-six-year-streak-as-most-innovative-nation

JICA. (2013, December 4). Project on capacity building for information security. Retrieved April 18, 2021, from JICA: https://www.jica.go.jp/project/english/indonesia/014/outline/index.html

JICA. (2018, December 11). Project for Human Resources Development for Cyber Security Professionals. Retrieved April 18, 2021, from JICA: https://www.jica.go.jp/project/english/indonesia/023/outline/index.html

JICA. (2019a, February 8). ANC-JICA-Id-SIRTII conducted Cyber Security Seminar. Retrieved April 18, 2021, from JICA: https://www.jica.go.jp/easttimor/english/office/topics/press190208_en.html

JICA. (2019b). Project on Capacity Building for Cyber Security in Vietnam. Retrieved February 19, 2021, from JICA: https://www.jica.go.jp/project/english/vietnam/052/index.html

JICA. (2020, February 7). The first technical cooperation project implemented under the Japan-ASEAN Technical Cooperation Agreement -Making contribution to building up capacity to formulate policy to ensure cybersecurity in the ASEAN region. Retrieved April 18, 2021, from JICA: https://www.jica.go.jp/english/news/press/2019/20200207_10_en.html

Johannesson, P., & Perjon, E. (2014). An Introduction to Design Science. Cham: Springer.

Kallender, P., & Hughes, C. W. (2017). Japan’s Emerging Trajectory as a ‘Cyber Power’: From Securitization to Militarization of Cyberspace. Journal of Strategic Studies, 40(1-2), 118-145.

Karim, M. F. (2018). Middle power, status-seeking and role conceptions: the cases of Indonesia and South Korea. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 72(4), 343-363.

Katzenstein, P. J. (1996). Cultural Norms and National Security. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Kemp, S. (2021, February 11). Digital 2021: South Korea. Retrieved April 9, 2021, from DataReportal: https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2021-south-korea

Kim, D. (2019). Restructuring the National Cybersecurity Governance System in South Korea: Critical Information Infrastructure. Seoul National University, Graduate School of International Studies. Seoul: Graduate School of International Studies, Seoul National University.

Kim, S. (2014). Cyber Security and Middle Power Diplomacy: A Network Perspective. The Korean Journal of International Studies, 12(2), 323-352.

KISA. (2021). Laws on the Internet and Information Security of Korea. Seoul: KISA.

Klimburg, A., & Zylberberg, H. (2015). Cyber Security Capacity Building: Developing Access. Oslo: NUPI.

Kono, Y. (1999). Myth and Reality: Why Japan Strives For Multilateralism. Retrieved April 10, 2021, from Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan: https://www.mofa.go.jp/announce/fm/kono/speech0101.html

Kusumastuti, L. W. (2015). ITB-Korea Stregthen Cooperation in Cyber Security. Retrieved February 19, 2021, from Institut Teknologi Bandung: https://www.itb.ac.id/news/read/4728/home/itb-korea-stregthen-cooperation-in-cyber-security

Lamont, C. K. (2015). Research Methods in International Relations. London: Sage.

Larasati, A. I. (2018). ASEAN-Japan Contribution to Regional Security: Cybersecurity Capacity Building (2014-2017). Bekasi: President University.

Laskar, R. H., & Sarkar, S. (2020, October 7). India, Japan finalise key cyber-security deal to boost cooperation on 5G, AI. Retrieved April 18, 2021, from Hindustan Times: https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/india-japan-finalise-key-cyber-security-deal-to-boost-cooperation-on-5g-ai/story-WCMa9En3NFPkQMWClGNFJI.html

Lee, M.-b. (2009, September 23). Address by H.E. Mr. Lee Myung-bak President of the Republic of Korea, 64th Session of the. Retrieved April 13, 2021, from http://www.un.org/ga/64/generaldebate/pdf/KR_en.pdf

Lee, S.-j. (2012). South Korea as New Middle Power: Seeking Complex Diplomacy. Seoul: East Asia Institute.

Maiese, M. (2003, September). Objectives of Confidence-Building Measures. Retrieved April 16, 2021, from Beyond Intractability: https://web.archive.org/web/20130908031946/https://www.beyondintractability.org/essay/confidence-building-measures

March, J., & Olsen, J. (1989). Rediscovering Institution. New York: Free Press.

Matsubara, M. (2018, June 4). How Japan’s New Cybersecurity Strategy Will Bring the Country Up to Par With the Rest of the World. Retrieved April 10, 2021, from Council on Foreign Relations: https://www.cfr.org/blog/how-japans-new-cybersecurity-strategy-will-bring-country-par-rest-world

Matsubara, M., & Mochinaga, D. (2021, February). Japan’s Cybersecurity Strategy: From the Olympics to the Indo-Pacific. Asie Visions(119), pp. 1-25.

Menocal, A. R. (2011, July 14). The future of Japan’s ODA: defining donor identity in a crowded marketplace. Retrieved April 12, 2021, from ODI: https://odi.org/en/events/the-future-of-japans-oda-defining-donor-identity-in-a-crowded-marketplace/#:~:text=to%20international%20development.-,1.,player%20in%20the%20development%20community.&text=Consistency%20%E2%80%93%20Japan%20is%20viewed%20by,the%20%

METI Japan. (2020, November 6). Outcomes of the 13th ASEAN-Japan Cybersecurity. Retrieved April 18, 2021, from METI Japan: https://www.meti.go.jp/english/press/2020/1106_003.html

METI Japan. (2021, March 15). Japan - US Industrial Control Systems Cybersecurity Week for the Indo-Pacific Region in FY2020. Retrieved April 18, 2021, from METI: https://www.meti.go.jp/english/press/2021/0315_001.html

Mo, J. (2016). South Korea’s middle power diplomacy: A case of growing compatibility between regional and global roles. International Journal, 71(4), 587-607.

MOD Japan. (2010). Defense of Japan 2010. Tokyo: Urban Connections.

MOFA Japan. (2019, January-February). Countermeasures Against Cybercrime. Retrieved April 18, 2021, from https://www.jica.go.jp/english/our_work/types_of_assistance/tech/acceptance/training/about/2018/sector/c8h0vm0000eqy9ys-att/1884518_e.pdf

MOFA Japan. (2019, January 18). The 3rd ASEAN-Japan Cybercrime Dialogue. Retrieved April 18, 2021, from MOFA Japan: https://www.mofa.go.jp/fp/is_sc/page25e_000294.html

Moon, J.-i. (2020, June 1). Opening Remarks by President Moon Jae-in at 6th Emergency Economic Council Meeting. Retrieved April 12, 2021, from Office of the President of the Republic of Korea: https://english1.president.go.kr/Briefingspeeches/Speeches/833

Morgan, D. L. (2007). Paradigms Lost and Pragmatism Regained Methodological Implications of Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 48-76.

Muller, L. P. (2015). Cyber Security Capacity Building in Developing Countries: Challenges and Opportunities. Oslo: NUPI.

National Security Office of the Republic of Korea. (2017). National Cybersecurity Strategy. Seoul: National Security Office of the Republic of Korea.

NIDS. (2014). NIDS China Security Report 2014: Diversification of Roles in the People’s Liberation Army and People’s Armed Police. Tokyo: 9National Institute for Defense Studies.

NISC. (2015). ASEAN-Japan Collaboration on Information Security. Retrieved April 18, 2021, from National Center of Incident Readiness and Strategy for Cybersecurity: https://www.nisc.go.jp/eng/fw_top.html

NISC. (2018, October 16-17). ASEAN – Japan Cybersecurity Working Group/Policy Meeting. Retrieved April 18, 2021, from https://www.nisc.go.jp/press/pdf/aseanj_meeting20181026.pdf

Nishida, T., Pick, J. B., & Sarkar, A. (2014). Japan's prefectural digital divide: A multivariate and spatial analysis. Telecommunications Policy, 38, 992-1010.

OECD. (2011). The Busan Partnership for Effective Development Co-operation. Retrieved April 13, 2021, from OECD: https://www.oecd.org/development/effectiveness/busanpartnership.htm

OECD. (2012). Cybersecurity Policy Making at a Turning Point: Analysing a New Generation of National Cybersecurity Strategies for the Internet Economy and Non-governmental Perspectives on a New Generation of National Cybersecurity Strategies. Paris: OECD.

OECD. (2021). Development Assistance Committee (DAC). Retrieved February 19, 2021, from OECD: https://www.oecd.org/dac/development-assistance-committee/

Park, D. (2016, January 12). Cybersecurity Spotlight: South Korea. Retrieved April 9, 2021, from The Henry M. Jackson School of International Studies University of Washington: https://jsis.washington.edu/news/cybersecurity-spotlight-south-korea/

Park, P. (2018, August 28). Experts examine Asia’s approach to cybersecurity. Retrieved April 10, 2021, from Brookings: https://www.brookings.edu/blog/order-from-chaos/2018/08/28/experts-examine-asias-approach-to-cybersecurity/

Park, S. J. (2015). The Korean Pivot and the Return of Great Power Politics in Northeast Asia. Washington, D.C.: Atlantic Council.

Park, S., Chung, D., & Park, H. W. (2019). Analytical framework for evaluating digital diplomacy usingnetwork analysis and topic modeling: Comparing South Korea and Japan. Information Processing and Management, 56, 1468-1483.

Pawlak, P. (2016). Capacity Building in Cyberspace as an Instrument of Foreign Policy. Global Policy, 7(1), 83-92.

Pawlak, P., & Barmpaliou, P.-N. (2017). Politics of Cybersecurity Capacity Building: Conundrum and Opportunity. Journal of Cyber Policy, 1-22.

Pulse. (2020, October 28). S. Korea boasts fastest internet connection, triples the global average. Retrieved April 11, 2021, from Pulse: https://pulsenews.co.kr/view.php?year=2020&no=1106605#:~:text=Korea%20boasts%20fastest%20internet%20connection%2C%20triples%20the%20global%20average,-2020.10.28%2014&text=South%20Korea%20reigns%20in%20internet,by%20global%20internet%20analyst%20Ookla

Raska, M., & Ang, B. (2018). Cybersecurity in Southeast Asia. Paris: Asia Centre & DGRIS.

Robertson, J. (2007). South Korea as a Middle Power: Capacity, Behaviour, and Now Opportunity. International Journal of Korean Unification Studies, 16(1), 151-174.

Schia, N. N. (2016). Teach a person how to surf: Cyber security as development assistance. Oslo: NUPI.

Schmitt, M. N. (2017). Tallinn Manual 2.0 on the International Law Applicable to Cyber Operations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sedimo, N. C., Bwalya, K. J., & Plessis, T. D. (2011). Conquering the Digital Divide: Botswana and South Korea Digital Divide Status and Intervention. South African Journal of Information, 13(1), 1-10.

Smith, C. W. (2002). Digital corporate citizenship : the business response to the digital divide. Indianapolis: The Center on Philanthropy at Indiana University.

Soesanto, S. (2020). Japan’s National Cybersecurity and Defense Posture: Policy and Organizations. Zurich: Center for Security Studies (CSS), ETH Zurich.

Tajima, Y. (2020, August 9). Japan to lead first cyber defense drill with ASEAN, US and Europe. Retrieved April 18, 2021, from NIkkei Asia: https://asia.nikkei.com/Business/Technology/Japan-to-lead-first-cyber-defense-drill-with-ASEAN-US-and-Europe

Tonami, A. (2018). Exporting the developmental state: Japan’s economic diplomacy in the Arctic. Third World Quarterly, 39(6), 1-15.

Tran, T. T. (2017, November 7). Pragmatism: How to Connect Positivism and Constructivism in Doing Research. Retrieved March 3, 2021, from WebQDA: https://www.webqda.net/pragmatism-how-to-connect-positivism-and-constructivism-in-doing-research/?lang=en

UN General Assembly. (2021, March 10). Open-Ended Working Group on Developments in the Field of Information and Telecommunications in the Context of International Security. Retrieved March 28, 2021, from https://front.un-arm.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Final-report-A-AC.290-2021-CRP.2.pdf

UN GGE. (2010, July 30). Group of Governmental Experts on Developments in the Field of Information and Telecommunication in the Context of International Security. Retrieved March 28, 2021, from https://undocs.org/A/65/201

UN GGE. (2013). Group of Governmental Experts on Developments in the Field of Information and Telecommunications in the Context of International Security. New York: United Nations General Assembly.

UN GGE. (2015). Report of the Group of Governmental Experts on Developments in the Field of Information and Telecommunications in the Context of International Security. New York: United Nations General Assembly.

US Embassy and Consulate in the Republic of Korea. (2017, January 5). 01/05/17 – Key Outcomes of the U.S.-Japan-ROK Trilateral Vice Foreign Ministerial Meetings. Retrieved April 10, 2021, from US Embassy and Consulate in the Republic of Korea: https://kr.usembassy.gov/010517-key-outcomes-u-s-japan-rok-trilateral-vice-foreign-ministerial-meetings/

van Puyvelde, D., & Brantly, A. F. (2019). Cybersecurity: Politics, Governance, and Conflict in Cyberspace. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Vosse, W. M. (2019). Japan’s Cyber Diplomacy. Brussels: EU Cyber Diplomacy and Resilience Clusters.

Williams, V. (2020). Foreign aid. Retrieved February 11, 2021, from https://www.britannica.com/topic/foreign-aid

World Bank. (2019). Global Cybersecurity Capacity Building: Lesson Learned and Recommendation towards Strengthening the Program. Washington, DC: World Bank.

World Bank. (2020, June 1). Global Cyber Security Capacity Program Phase I and II: Strengthening national Cyber Security Environment of Selected Developing Countries. Retrieved April 19, 2021, from World Bank: https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/feature/2020/06/01/kwpfgscp

World Bank. (2021). Individuals using the Internet (% of population). Retrieved April 24, 2021, from World Bank Open Data: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/IT.NET.USER.ZS

Yasushi, W., & McConnell, D. (2008). Soft Power Superpowers: Cultural and National Assets of Japan and the United States. New York: M.E. Sharpe.

Yonhap News Agency. (2020, March 5). Digital divide still high in S. Korea. Retrieved April 9, 2021, from Yonhap News Agency: https://en.yna.co.kr/view/AEN20200305004400320

Download

Share

COinS