•  
  •  
 

Abstract

The Kartu Prakerja Program is a form of the active labor market policy in Indonesia, serving as a significant initiative to enhance competencies and job opportunities, including for vulnerable groups such as the young and female labor force. This study aims to analyze the program’s impact on youth employment, with a focus on gender differences. Using Propensity Score Matching (PSM), the results show a significant positive effect on employment probability, particularly for women. The findings suggest that skills training and financial incentives play a crucial role in enhancing employability. The study recommends expanding program access to vulnerable groups and continuously assessing its effectiveness.

References

[1] Al Ayyubi, MS, Pratomo, DS, & Prasetyia, F 2023, ’Does pre-employment card program improve Indonesian youth labor market performance in pandemic era?’, Cogent Economics & Finance, vol. 11, no. 2, p. 2267752. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2023.2267752.

[2] Alatas, V, Hanna, R, Maulana, A, Olken, BA, Satriawan, E, & Sumarto, S 2021, Kartu Prakerja impact evaluation: Preliminary findings. viewed 9 February 2024, https://public-prakerja.oss-ap-southeast-5.aliyuncs.com/www/ebook-reporting/Ringkasan_Eksekutif_Kajian_ Evaluasi_Dampak_Kartu_Prakerja_2021_oleh_J-PAL_ SEA_Bahasa_Inggris.pdf.

[3] Alegre, MÀ, Casado, D, Sanz, J, & Todeschini, FA 2015, ’The impact of training-intensive labour market policies on labour and educational prospects of NEETs: Evidence from Catalonia (Spain)’, Educational Research, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 151-167. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2015.1030852.

[4] APEC Economic Committee 2021, APEC economic policy report 2021: Structural reform and the future of work, Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation. viewed 26 January 2024, https://www.apec.org/publications/2021/ 11/2021-apec-economic-policy-report.

[5] Atanassov, A, & Trifonova, S 2020, ’Assessment of the net effect of the active labour market policy in Bulgaria’, Journal of Contemporary Management Issues, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 263-290. doi: https://doi.org/10.30924/mjcmi.25.2.15.

[6] Auer, P, Efendioglu, Ü, & Leschke, J 2005, Active labour market policies around the world: Coping with the consequences of globalization, International Labour Organization.

[7] Bentolila, S, & Jansen, M (eds.) 2016, Long-term unemployment after the great recession: Cause and remedies, CEPR Press. viewed 9 February 2024, https://cepr.org/publications/books-and-reports/long-term-unemployment-after-great-recession-causesand- remedies.

[8] Bernhard, S, & Kruppe, T 2012, ’Effectiveness of further vocational training in Germany – Empirical findings for persons receiving means-tested unemployment benefits’, Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, vol. 132, no. 4, pp. 501-526. doi: https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.132.4.501.

[9] Blázquez, M, Herrarte, A, & Sáez, F 2019, ’Training and job search assistance programmes in Spain: The case of long-term unemployed’, Journal of Policy Modeling, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 316-335. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2019.03.004.

[10] Bloom, D, Canning, D, & Sevilla, J 2003, The demographic dividend: A new perspective on the economic consequences of population change, RAND Corporation.

[11] Bonoli, G 2017, ’Active labour market policies for an inclusive growth’ in Reframing global social policy: Social investment for sustainable and inclusive growth, eds C Deeming & P Smyth, Policy Press, Bristol, pp. 169-188. doi: https://doi.org/10.51952/9781447332503.ch007.

[12] Bratti, M, Ghirelli, C, Havari, E, & Santangelo, G 2022, ’Vocational training for unemployed youth in Latvia’, Journal of Population Economics, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 677-717. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-021-00877-8.

[13] Brown, AJ, & Koettl, J 2015, ’Active labor market programs - Employment gain or fiscal drain?’, IZA Journal of Labor Economics, vol. 4, p. 12. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40172-015-0025-5.

[14] Burger, A, Kluve, J, Vodopivec, M, & Vodopivec, M 2022, ’A comprehensive impact evaluation of active labour market programmes in Slovenia’, Empirical Economics, vol. 62, no. 6, pp. 3015-3039. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-021-02111-6.

[15] Caliendo, M, & Kopeinig, S 2008, ’Some practical guidance for the implementation of propensity score matching’, Journal of Economic Surveys, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 31-72. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6419.2007.00527.x.

[16] Card, D, Kluve, J & Weber, A 2018, ’What works? A meta analysis of recent active labor market program evaluations’, Journal of the European Economic Association, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 894-931. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/jeea/jvx028.

[17] Coordinating Ministry for Economic Affairs of the Republic of Indonesia 2022, Kartu Prakerja program management report 2021. viewed 26 January 2024, https://public-prakerja.oss-ap-southeast-5.aliyuncs.com/www/ebook-reporting/Laporan-Manajemen-Pelaksana-Program-Kartu-Prakerja- Tahun-2021-English.pdf.

[18] Dengler, K 2019a, ’Effectiveness of active labour market programmes on the job quality of welfare recipients in Germany’, Journal of Social Policy, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 807- 838. doi: 10.1017/S0047279419000114.

[19] Dengler, K 2019b, ’Effectiveness of sequences of classroom training for welfare recipients: What works best in West Germany?’, Applied Economics, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 1-46. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2018.1489110.

[20] Destefanis, S, Fragetta, M, & Ruggiero, N 2023, ’Active and passive labour-market policies: The outlook from the Beveridge curve’, Applied Economics, vol. 55, no. 55, pp. 6538-6550. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2022.2159010.

[21] Dias, MC, Ichimura, H, & van den Berg, GJ 2013, ’Treatment evaluation with selective participation and ineligibles’, Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 108, no. 502, pp. 441-455. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2013.795447.

[22] Ernst, E, Merola, R & Reljic, J 2022, ‘Labour market policies for inclusiveness: A literature review with a gap analysis’, ILO Working Paper, 78, International Labour Organization. viewed 8 February 2024, https://researchrepository.ilo. org/view/pdfCoverPage?instCode=41ILO_INST&filePid= 13100799090002676&download=true.

[23] Escudero, V 2018, ’Are active labour market policies effective in activating and integrating low-skilled individuals? An international comparison’, IZA Journal of Labor Policy, vol. 7, p. 4. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40173-018-0097-5.

[24] Escudero, V, Kluve, J, López Mourelo, E, & Pignatti, C 2019, ’Active labour market programmes in Latin America and the Caribbean: Evidence from a meta-analysis’, The Journal of Development Studies, vol. 55, no. 12, pp. 2644-2661. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2018.1546843.

[25] Focacci, CN 2020, ’“You reap what you sow”: Do active labour market policies always increase job security? Evidence from the Youth Guarantee’, European Journal of Law and Economics, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 373-429. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-020-09654-6.

[26] Heckman, JJ, Ichimura, H & Todd, PE 1997, ’Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator: evidence from evaluating a job training programme’, The Review of Economic Studies, vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 605-654. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/2971733.

[27] Heckman, J, Ichimura, H, Smith, J, & Todd, P 1998, ’Characterizing selection bias using experimental data’, Econometrica, vol. 66, no. 5, pp. 1017-1098. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/2999630.

[28] Heckman, JJ, LaLonde, RJ & Smith, JA 1999, ’The economics and econometrics of active labor market programs’, in Handbook of Labor Economics, vol. 3 part A, eds OC Ashenfelter & D Card, Elsevier, pp. 1865-2097. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1573-4463(99)03012-6.

[29] International Labour Organization 2023, ‘Public employment services and active labour market policies for transitions: Responses to mega trends and crises’, Global Report Part I. viewed 8 February 2024, https://www.ilo.org/publications/public-employment-services-and-active-labour-marketpolicies- transitions.

[30] Irandoust, M 2023, ’Active labor market as an instrument to reduce unemployment’, Journal of Government and Economics, vol. 9, p. 100065. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jge.2023.100065.

[31] Khandker, SR, Koolwal, GB & Samad, HA 2009, Handbook on impact evaluation: Quantitative methods and practices, The World Bank.

[32] Kluve, J 2016, ‘A review of the effectiveness of Active labour market programmes with a focus on Latin America and the Caribbean’, Research Department Working Paper, 9, International Labour Office. viewed 25 January 2024, https://researchrepository.ilo.org/esploro/outputs/ encyclopediaEntry/A-review-of-the-effectiveness-of/ 995264819702676.

[33] Kluve, J, Puerto, S, Robalino, D, Romero, JM, Rother, F, Stöterau, J, Weidenkaff, F, & Witte, M 2019, ’Do youth employment programs improve labor market outcomes? A quantitative review’, World Development, vol. 114, pp. 237- 253. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.10.004.

[34] Kruppe, T, & Lang, J 2018, ’Labour market effects of retraining for the unemployed: The role of occupations’, Applied Economics, vol. 50, no. 14, pp. 1578-1600. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2017.1368992.

[35] Lammers, M, & Kok, L 2021, ’Are active labor market policies (cost-)effective in the long run? Evidence from the Netherlands’, Empirical Economics, vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 1719- 1746. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-019-01812-3.

[36] Lechner, M, Miquel, R, & Wunsch, C 2011, ’Long-run effects of public sector sponsored training in West Germany’, Journal of the European Economic Association, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 742-784. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1542-4774.2011.01029.x.

[37] Lindley, J, Mcintosh, S, Roberts, J, Murray, CC, & Edlin, R 2015, ’Policy evaluation via a statistical control: A nonparametric evaluation of the ‘Want2Work’ active labour market policy’, Economic Modelling, vol. 51, pp. 635-645. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2015.09.018.

[38] Martin, JP 2015, ’Activation and active labour market policies in OECD countries: Stylised facts and evidence on their effectiveness’, IZA Journal of Labor Policy, vol. 4, p. 4. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40173-015-0032-y.

[39] McKenzie, D 2017, ’How effective are active labor market policies in developing countries? A critical review of recent evidence’, The World Bank Research Observer, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 127-154. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/lkx001.

[40] Mo Costabella, L 2017, ’Do high school graduates benefit from intensive vocational training?’, International Journal of Manpower, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 746-764. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-01-2016-0008.

[41] Nguyen, P, Putra, F, Considine, M, & Sanusi, A 2023, ’Activation through welfare conditionality and marketisation in active labour market policies: Evidence from Indonesia’, Australian Journal of Public Administration, vol. 82, no. 4, pp. 488-506. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12602.

[42] Nguyen, P, Considine, M, Putra, F, & Sanusi, A 2024, ’Digital welfare-to-work in the global south: A case of Indonesian pre-employment card program’, Australian Journal of Social Issues. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/ajs4.362.

[43] Nordlund, M, & Greve, B 2018, Labour market: Focus on active labour market policies, in Routledge Handbook of the Welfare State, 2nd edition, ed B Greve, Routledge, pp. 366-377.

[44] Pastore, F, & Pompili, M 2020, ’Assessing the impact of off-the-job and on-the-job training on employment outcomes: A counterfactual evaluation of the PIPOL program’, Evaluation Review, vol. 44, no. 2-3, pp. 145-184. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X20966112.

[45] Pignatti, C, & Van Belle, E 2021, ’Better together: Active and passive labor market policies in developed and developing economies’, IZA Journal of Development and Migration, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 9. doi: https://doi.org/10.2478/izajodm-2021-0009.

[46] Presisi Indonesia 2022, Impact evaluation of Kartu Prakerja as a COVID-19 recovery program. viewed 23 January 2024, https://public-prakerja. oss-ap-southeast-5.aliyuncs.com/www/ebook-reporting/ Evaluasi-dampak-kartu-prakerja-eng.pdf.

[47] Rosenbaum, PR, & Rubin, DB 1983, ’The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects’, Biometrika, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 41-55. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/70.1.41.

[48] Rotar, LJ 2021, ’Evaluation of the effectiveness of employment programmes on young unemployed people’, Engineering Economics, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 60-69. doi: https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.ee.32.1.23276.

[49] Statistics Indonesia 2021, The national labor force survey booklet August 2021, Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS - Statistics Indonesia). viewed 13 January 2024, https://www.bps.go.id/en/ publication/2021/12/22/52d405e2dc5dc6f2ba57bf83/ the-national-labor-force-survey-booklet-august-2021. html.

[50] Statistics Indonesia 2022, Analisis profil penduduk Indonesia, Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS - Statistics Indonesia). viewed 13 January 2024, https://www.bps.go. id/id/publication/2022/06/24/ea52f6a38d3913a5bc557c5f/analisis-profil-penduduk-indonesia.html.

[51] The Ministry of National Development Planning 2020, Pedoman teknis penyusunan rencana aksi - Edisi II: Tujuan Pembangunan Berkelanjutan (TPB)/Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), Kedeputian Bidang Kemaritiman dan Sumber Daya Alam, Kementerian Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional/Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional (Bappenas). viewed 13 January 2024, https: //sdgs.bappenas.go.id/website/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Buku-Pedoman-Rencana-Aksi-SDGs.pdf.

[52] United Nations 2023, The sustainable development goals report 2023: Special edition, Department of Economic and Social Affairs. viewed 13 January 2024, https://desapublications.un.org/publications/ sustainable-development-goals-report-2023-specialedition.

[53] Wisniewski, Z 2022, ’The effectiveness of Polish active labour market policies’, Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, no. 56, pp. 125-132. doi: https://doi.org/10.12775/bgss-2022-0017.

Download

Share

COinS