Abstract
In 2014, the Indonesian government has targets to obtain 80% of electrification ratio and 98.9% of rural electrification ratio. Extending the grid and off-grid connection has been done to obtain the targets. This paper aims to compare two main programs on rural electrification namely Super Extra Energy Saving (Super Ekstra Hemat Energi, SEHEN) that is belong to PLN (state owned company in electricity) and the Solar Home System (SHS) that is financed by the Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources (MEMR). Indonesia has started the rural electrification program in the late 1950s, but how to provide electricity in a sustainable ways both organizationally and institutionally still become a big challenge. The experiences from East Nusa Tenggara provinces showed that both SEHEN and SHS can instantly improve electrification ratio, but government needs to synchronize the technical, administrative, and financial aspect from the two programs. Without any improvements in designing the program, we argue that the existing program is not sustainable.
References
[1] AGECC 2010, ’Energy for A Sustainable Future’, Summary report and recommendations, The Secretary- General’s Advisory Group on Energy and Climate Change (AGECC), New York.
[2] Distamben NTT 2011, Data Potensi dan Pengembangan Energi Baru Terbarukan, Dinas Pertambangan dan Energi Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Timur, Kupang.
[3] DJK ESDM 2013, Program Listrik Hemat dan Murah dalam Pameran Musrembangnas 2013, Direktorat Jenderal Ketenagalistrikan, Kementerian Energi dan Sumber Daya Mineral. Available from: . [20 August 2014].
[4] IRENA 2012, Renewable Energy Technologies: Cost Analysis Series, vol. 1 (Power Sector), issue 3/5: Hydropower. International Renewable Energy Agency, Germany. Available from: . [21 August 2014].
[5] Kanagawa, M & Nakata, T 2008, ’Assessment of Access to Electricity and the Socio-economic Impacts in Rural Areas of Developing Countries’, Energy Policy, vol. 36, no. 6, 2016–2029.
[6] McCawley, P 1978, ’Rural Electrification in Indonesia–Is It Time?’, Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, vol. 14, no. 2, 34–69.
[7] Mohsin, A 2014, ’Wiring the New Order: Indonesian Village Electrification and Patrimonial Technopolitics (1966– 1998)’, SOJOURN: Journal of Social Issues in Southeast Asia, vol. 29, no. 1, 63–95.
[8] Munasinghe, M 1988, ’Rural Electrifiction: International Experience and Policy in Indonesia’, Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, vol. 24, no. 2, 87–105.
[9] PT PLN 2009, Statistik PLN 2009, PT PLN (Persero), Jakarta.
[10] PT PLN 2011, Statistik PLN 2011, PT PLN (Persero), Jakarta.
[11] PT PLN 2012a, Statistik PLN 2012, PT PLN (Persero), Jakarta.
[12] PT PLN 2012b, Rencana Usaha Penyediaan Tenaga Listrik PT. PLN (Persero) 2012–2021, PT PLN (Persero), Jakarta.
[13] Winkler, H, Simoes, AF, Rovere, EL, Alam, M, Rahman, A, & Mwakasonda, S 2011, ’Access and Affordability of Electricity in Developing Countries’. World Development, vol. 39, no. 6, 1037–1050
Bahasa Abstract
Tahun 2014, Pemerintah Indonesia menetapkan target pencapaian rasio elektrifikasi sebesar 80% dan rasio elektifikasi perdesaan sebesar 98.9%. Perpanjangan jaringan grid dan off-grid telah dilakukan sepagai upaya pencapaian target. Tulisan ini bertujuan membandingkan dua program elktifikasi perdesaan yang utama, yaitu Super Ekstra Hemat Energi (SEHEN) yang dimiliki PLN (Badan Usaha Milik Negara di bidang kelistrikan) dan Solar Home System (SHS) yang didanai Kementerian Energi dan Sumber Daya Mineral. Indonesia telah memulai program elektrifikasi perdesaan sejak akhir 1950an, namun masih menghadapi tantangan dalam menemukan cara elektrifikasi yang berkesinambungan secara organisasional maupun institusional. Pengalaman dari Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Timur menunjukkan bahwa SEHEN maupun SHS dapat meningkatkan rasio elektrifikasi secara signifikan, namun pemerintah masih harus menyelaraskan aspek teknis, administratif, dan keuangan dari kedua program. Tanpa pembenahan dari sisi rancangan, kami berpendapat bahwa program yang telah ada tidak ada bertahan.
Recommended Citation
Sambodo, Maxensius Tri
(2015)
"Rural Electrification Program in Indonesia: Comparing SEHEN and SHS Program,"
Economics and Finance in Indonesia: Vol. 61:
No.
2, Article 3.
DOI: 10.47291/efi.v61i2.505
Available at:
https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/efi/vol61/iss2/3
Included in
Finance Commons, Macroeconomics Commons, Public Economics Commons, Regional Economics Commons