•  
  •  
 

Abstract

Background: The development of sustainable housing has become an important issue amid global climate change challenges. Although the concept of green housing has begun to be implemented in Indonesia, evaluations of its application in subsidized housing remain limited, particularly those examining design readiness and neighborhood system integration.

Aim: This study aims to analyze the implementation of energy efficiency and neighborhood innovation variables within the green housing concept at the Mulia Gading Kencana (MGK) Housing Estate in Serang, Banten.

Methods: This research employed a descriptive–quantitative approach with a case study design. Data were collected through field observations, brief interviews with the developer, and a review of Greenship Neighborhood (GBCI) standards and international green building frameworks (LEED, BREEAM, WELL, and EDGE). The assessment applied a Likert-scale, presence-based approach, with a weighting scheme of 60% for energy efficiency and 40% for neighborhood innovation, complemented by a sensitivity check using an alternative 50:50 weighting scheme.

Results: The assessment results indicate that MGK achieved a final score of 4.8 under both the 60:40 and 50:50 weighting schemes, demonstrating consistency across different weighting assumptions. The implementation of energy efficiency is reflected in the use of LED lighting across all housing units, the utilization of solar energy for neighborhood lighting, and the application of passive design strategies such as building orientation, cross-ventilation, and shading devices. Neighborhood innovation includes water and waste management systems such as bio-septic tanks, biopores, and artificial lakes, as well as the use of environmentally friendly materials with more than 40% domestic content.

Conclusion: Of the 2 variables that have been applied, the maximum score is obtained on the criteria for renewable energy types, passive design strategies, along with innovation in residential areas. This research shows that the concept of green housing can be applied contextually and realistically to subsidized housing through an emphasis on energy efficiency and adaptive regional innovation.

Keywords: affordable housing, energy efficiency, green housing, innovation, Greenship Neighborhood

Bahasa Abstract

Latar Belakang: Pengembangan perumahan berkelanjutan menjadi isu penting di tengah tantangan perubahan iklim global. Konsep green housing di Indonesia mulai diterapkan, namun evaluasi penerapan pada perumahan bersubsidi masih terbatas, khususnya yang meninjau kesiapan desain dan sistem kawasan.

Tujuan: Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis penerapan variabel efisiensi energi dan inovasi kawasan dengan konsep green housing pada Perumahan Mulia Gading Kencana (MGK) di Serang, Banten.

Metode: Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan deskriptif-kuantitatif dengan desain studi kasus. Data diperoleh melalui observasi lapangan, wawancara singkat dengan pihak pengembang, serta telaah dokumen standar Greenship Neighborhood (GBCI) dan standar bangunan hijau global (LEED, BREEAM, WELL, dan EDGE). Penilaian dilakukan menggunakan skala Likert berbasis presence-based assessment dengan pembobotan efisiensi energi (60%) dan inovasi kawasan (40), serta dilengkapi uji sensitivitas menggunakan skema pembobotan alternatif (50:50).

Hasil: Hasil penilaian menunjukkan bahwa MGK memperoleh skor akhir 4,8 baik pada skema pembobotan 60:40 maupun 50:50, yang mengindikasikan konsistensi hasil penilaian. Penerapan efisiensi energi tercermin dari penggunaan lampu LED pada seluruh unit hunian, pemanfaatan energi surya untuk penerangan kawasan, serta penerapan desain pasif melalui orientasi bangunan, ventilasi silang, dan shading device. Aspek inovasi kawasan meliputi sistem pengelolaan air dan limbah seperti bioseptic tank, biopori, dan danau buatan, serta penggunaan material ramah lingkungan dengan proporsi produk dalam negeri >40%.

Kesimpulan: Dari 2 variabel yang telah diterapkan, skor maksimum didapatkan pada kriteria jenis energi terbarukan, strategi desain pasif, beserta adanya inovasi pada kawasan perumahan. Penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa konsep green housing dapat diterapkan secara kontekstual dan realistis pada perumahan bersubsidi melalui penekanan pada efisiensi energi dan inovasi kawasan yang adaptif.

Kata kunci: efisiensi energi, green housing, inovasi, perumahan bersubsidi, Greenship Neighborhood

References

Ali Amin Soewarno. (2024). View of Kinerja Lingkungan Rumah Subsidi di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Teknik. https://jurnal.unusultra.ac.id/index.php/jutek/article/view/279

Aziz, A., & Beg, M. R. (2022). Green Building: Future Ahead (hlm. 161–176). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80702-3_10

Bhatt, A., Desai, S., & Gulabani, S. (2019). Energy-Efficient Green Building with Sustainable Engineering of Natural Resources (hlm. 329–336). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6717-5_32

BRE Global. (2025). BREEAM new construction version 7: Technical standard. BRE Global. https://breeam.com/standards

Cuce, E., Cuce, P. M., Saboor, S., Ghosh, A., & Sheikhnejad, Y. (2022). Floating PVs in Terms of Power Generation, Environmental Aspects, Market Potential, and Challenges. Sustainability, 14(5), 2626. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14052626

International Finance Corporation. (2021). EDGE user guide (Version 3.0.a). World Bank Group. https://edgebuildings.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/211026-EDGE-User-Guide-for-All-Building-Types-Version-3.0.A.pdf

Garro, M., Picallo-Perez, A., Hernandez-Cruz, P., Hidalgo-Betanzos, J., Sala-Lizarraga, J., & Ruiz De Vergara-Ruiz De Azua, I. (2023). PV Potential of the Public Building Stock of the Basque Country. 36th International Conference on Efficiency, Cost, Optimization, Simulation and Environmental Impact of Energy Systems (ECOS 2023), 1701–1712. https://doi.org/10.52202/069564-0154

Gil, G. O., Chowdhury, J. I., Balta-Ozkan, N., Hu, Y., Varga, L., & Hart, P. (2021). Optimising renewable energy integration in new housing developments with low-carbon technologies. Renewable Energy, 169, 527–540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.01.059

Gong, X., Jia, C., Yu, Y., & Li, C. (2019). Optimization of passive design measures for residential buildings in Chinese hot summer and cold winter areas. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 310(2), 022058. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/310/2/022058

Green Building Council Indonesia. (2015). GREENSHIP Neighborhood versi 1.1. Green Building Council Indonesia. https://gbcindonesia.org/etalase?book=neighborhood

Hamoda, M. F. (2020). Role of Green Buildings in Reduction of Energy Consumption. Dalam Gulf Conference on Sustainable Built Environment (hlm. 439–451). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39734-0_25

Hari Purwoto, B., Penggunaan Panel Surya Sebagai Sumber Energi Alternatif, E., Alimul, M. F., & Fahmi Huda, I. (2022). Efisiensi Penggunaan Panel Surya Sebagai Sumber Energi Alternatif. https://journals.ums.ac.id/emitor/article/view/6251

Hussain, S., & Sheikh, H. A. (2023). Sustainability assessment by green building rating systems: A comparative analysis of LEED, BREEAM, and CASBEE on a case study. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, 5(6). https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2023.v05i06.8935

IGAHP: Rumah Hijau Bersubsidi (Taman Anggrek, Kuningan, Jawa Barat). Direktorat Jenderal Pembiayaan Infrastruktur PUPR, 19 Desember 2023. Tersedia di: https://pembiayaan.pu.go.id/news/detail/272/IGAHP-Rumah-Hijau-Bersubsidi-Menuju-1-Juta-Unit-Rumah-Hijau-Tahun-2030

International WELL Building Institute. (2020). WELL building standard v2. International WELL Building Institute. https://v2.wellcertified.com/

Laquatra, J., Pillai, G., Singh, A., & Syal, M. G. “Matt.” (2008). Green and Healthy Housing. Journal of Architectural Engineering, 14(4), 94–97. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0431(2008)14:4(94)

Nejat, P., Jomehzadeh, F., Taheri, M. M., Gohari, M., & Abd. Majid, M. Z. (2015). A global review of energy consumption, CO 2 emissions, and policy in the residential sector (with an overview of the top ten CO 2 emitting countries). Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 43, 843–862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.11.066

Nguanso, C., Taweekun, J., Dai, Y., & Ge, T. (2020). The Criteria of Passive and Low Energy in Building Design for Tropical Climate in Thailand. International Journal of Integrated Engineering, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.30880/ijie.2020.12.02.029

Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 16 Tahun 2021 tentang Peraturan Pelaksanaan Undang‑Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2002 tentang Bangunan Gedung.

Peraturan Menteri Pekerjaan Umum dan Perumahan Rakyat Nomor 21 Tahun 2021 tentang Penilaian Kinerja Bangunan Gedung Hijau.

Raimi + Associates & Natural Resources Defense Council. (2011). A citizen’s guide to LEED for neighborhood development: How to tell if development is smart and green. Natural Resources Defense Council. https://www.nrdc.org/sites/default/files/citizens_guide_LEED-ND.pdf

Sugito, S., Rajiman, R., Purba, R. H., Hidayat, A. M., Ramadhan, A. A., Irsyad, A., Putra, M. I. S. P., Widiyana, M. D., & Bhakti, M. A. W. (2022). Pemanfaatan Teknologi Biopori Pada Lingkungan Rumah. Devotion: Journal Corner of Community Service, 1(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.54012/devotion.v1i1.82

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 28 Tahun 2002 tentang Bangunan Gedung. 16 Desember 2002. Tersedia di: https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Home/Details/44487/uu-no-28-tahun-2002

U.S. Green Building Council. (2018). LEED v4 for neighborhood development: Includes LEED ND: Plan and LEED ND: Built Project (Updated July 2, 2018). U.S. Green Building Council. https://www.usgbc.org

Viqolbi, M. A., & Anjastari, H. A. (2021). [RH1] Proceedings Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) Conference Green and Affordable Housing for Low-Income People: Case Study BP2BT Housing in Palembang. https://doi.org/6301005.

Zhang, Z. J. (2013). Goals and Operation of Green Building. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 438–439, 1706–1709. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.438-439.1706

Download

Share

COinS