•  
  •  
 

Abstract

Construction of waste incinerators often encounters resistance from the public. The minimum requirements for the ac- ceptance of these installations include modern air pollution control (APC) technology and safe disposal of residues. Confidence in the statements of government and government agencies as well as on those who support is an important point of acceptance. Independent scientific bodies such as universities can help to make this happen. In the case of the installation of waste into energy (WtE), such scientific support can be the measurement of emissions and their evalua- tion. Many products that enter the waste stream contain heavy metals, persistent organic pollutants, and other harmful substances. Their presence constitutes another challenge for recycling. This challenge can be solved most likely by binding specifications for chemicals in and design for recycling of products.

Bahasa Abstract

Studi Penerimaan Publik pada Pabrik Energi Sampah: Fakta dari Jerman dan Indonesia. Pembangunan insinera- tor sampah sering mengalami penolakan dari masyarakat. Persyaratan minimum agar instalasi insinerator dapat diterima adalah adanya teknologi pengendalian pencemaran udara modern dan pembuangan residu yang aman. Kepercayaan pada pemerintah dan lembaga pemerintah serta mereka yang mendukung program ini merupakan hal yang penting agar bisa diterima di masyarakat. Institusi independen seperti Universitas dapat membantu mewujudkan hal tersebut. Dalam kasus instalasi limbah menjadi energi (WtE), dukungan ilmiah bisa berupa pengukuran emisi buang beserta hasil evalu- asinya. Banyak produk yang masuk ke aliran limbah mengandung logam berat, polutan organik yang persisten (POPs) dan zat berbahaya lainnya. Kandungan bahan berbahaya tersebut menjadi tantangan tersendiri dalam proses daur ulang. Tantangan dalam permasalahan ini dapat diatasi dengan cara mengikatkan bahan kimia di dalam spesifikasi tertentu dan merancang daur ulang produk.

References

  1. UNEP, ISWA 2015, Global Waste Management Outlook (GWMO), 2015.
  2. R. Irfany, Govt Urged to Stop Waste-to-Energy Projects,TEMPO.CO. https://en.tempo.co/read/news/ 2017/09/20/056910854/Govt-Urged-to-Stop-Waste-to-Energy-Projects, 2017.
  3. Bundesministerium für Umwelt (Ed.), Müll-verbrennung – ein Gefahrenherd? (in German), http://www.bmu.de/files/pdfs/allgemein/application/pdf/muellverbrennung_dioxin.pdf, 2005.
  4. IFEU, Beitrag der Abfallwirtschaft zur nachhal-tigen Entwicklung in Deutschland, Teilbericht Siedlungsabfälle (in German), https://www.umweltbun-de-samt.de/sites/default/files/medien/publikation/long/ 2899.pdf, 2004.
  5. C. Spohn, M. Treder (ITAD), Betreiber von Ab-fallverbrennungsanlagen im Spannungsfeld des BVT-Merkblatts (in German), https://www.itad.de/ information/studien/BREFITADTKBerlinJan2016. pdf, 2016.
  6. ITAD – Interessengemeinschaft der thermischen Abfallbehandlungsanlagen in Deutschland e.V., Düsseldorf, Emissionen (in German), https://www. itad.de/ITAD/emisionen, 2018.
  7. MSWI Bielefeld, Emission report 2016 (in Ger-man), pages 1 and 6, http://www.mva-bielefeld.de/ _Downloads/Emissionsberichte/MVA_Biele-feld__ Emissionsbericht_2016.pdf, 2017.
  8. P. Douglas, A. Freni-Sterrantino, M L. Sanchez, D.C. Ashworth, R.E. Ghosh, D. Fecht, A. Font, M. Blangiardo, J. Gulliver, M.B. Toledano, P. Elliott, K. de Hoogh, G.W. Fuller, A.L. Hansell, Environ. Sci. Technol. 51 (2017) 7511.
  9. IFEU, Ökobilanz thermischer Entsorgungssysteme für brennbare Abfälle in Nordrhein-Westfalen (in German), https://www.ifeu.de/abfallwirtschaft/pdf/ therm_entsorg.pdf, 2007.
  10. U. Lahl, B. Zeschmar-Lahl, in: K.J. Thomé-Kozmiensky, L. Pelloni (Eds.): Waste Management, 2, 2011, p.363.
  11. T. Eikmann, S. Eikmann, Humantoxikologische Bewertung von Abfallbehandlungsanlagen (in German), http://www.itad.de/media/www.itad.de/ org/med_90034/289_eikmann2007_humantoxikologischebewertung.pdf, 2007.
  12. Bayerisches Landesamt für Umwelt – LfU Bayern, 22.8.2008, cited in U. Lahl, W. Steven, Müllmaga-zin 4 (2008) 4-11 (in German).
  13. German Federal Government, Verordnung zur Ein-führung einer Ersatzbaustoffverordnung, zur Neufassung der Bundes-Bodenschutz- und Alt-lastenverordnung und zur Änderung der Depo-nieverordnung und der Gewerbeabfallverordnung (2017) (in German).
  14. J. Petrlik, L. Bell, Toxic ash poisons our food chain, International POPs Elimination Network (IPEN), April 2017.
  15. M. Wilken, B. Zeschmar-Lahl (in German), Müll-Handbuch, Kz. 1752, 1994.
  16. E. Abad, M.A. Adrados, J. Caixach, B. Fabrellas, J. Rivera, Chemosphere 40 (2000) 1143.
  17. UNEP: Toolkit for Identification and Quantifica-tion of Releases of Dioxins, Furans and Other Un-intentional POPs under Article 5 of the Stockholm Convention, 2003.
  18. M. Standaert, YaleEnvironment360, April 20, 2017, https://e360.yale.edu/features/as-china-pushes-waste- to-energy-incinerators-protests-are-mounting, 2017.
  19. P. Quicker, Y. Noel, R. Daschner, M. Faulstich, U. Raesfeld, M. Gleis, ReSource 2 (2011) 50-54 (in German).
  20. Wien Energie, https://www.wienenergie.at/epor-tal3/ ep/channelView.do/channelId/-49106, Screenshot, 2018.
  21. E. Damanhuri, W. Handoko, T. Padmi, In: A. Paria-tamby, M. Tanaka (Eds.), Municipal Solid Waste Management in Asia and the Pacific Islands: Chal-lenges and Strategic Solutions, Springer Science & Business Media, 2013, 139-155.
  22. C. Velis, Waste pickers in Global South: Informal recycling sector in a circular economy era, Waste Manag. Res. 35 (2017), 329-331.
  23. Carbon Trust, Waste to energy in Indonesia. As-sessing opportunities and barriers using insights from the UK and beyond. CTC831, June 2014.
  24. R. de Bercegol, J. Cavé, A. Nguyen Thai Huyen, Resour. 6 (2017) 70.
  25. L. Bell, R. Weber, B. De Borst, M.C. Paun, I. Holoubeck, A. Watson, J. Vijgen, Assessment of POPs contaminated sites and the need for stringent soil standards for food and feed safety. Expert meeting on Best Available Techniques and Best Environmental Practices and Toolkit for Identifica-tion and Quantification of Releases of Dioxins, Fu-rans and Other Unintentional Persistent Organic Pollutants under the Stockholm Convention. Brati-slava, Slovakia, 25–27 October 2016.
  26. SAICM, Chemicals in products programme. SAICM/ICCM.4/10, http://www.saicm.org/Por-tals/ 12/Documents/EPI/CiP%20programme%20October2015_Final.pdf, 2015.
  27. K. Kaiser, M. Schmid, M. Schlummer, Recycling, 3/1 (2018) 1; doi:10.3390/recycling3010001.
  28. D.J. Richards, R.A. Frosch, in: D.J. Richards (Ed.): The Industrial Green Game: Implications for Envi-ronmental Design and Management, 1–34, https://www.nap.edu/read/4982/chapter/2, 1997.

Download

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.