•  
  •  
 

Abstract

This study tries to provide an overview of how open access scientific books from the OMP-based website at LIPI Press contribute to supporting the means of disseminating knowledge. This study used a descriptive qualitative method with data collection through literature study and observation of the OMP LIPI Press system, Google Analytics, Google Scholar, and Dimensions. The application of OMP as a scientific publishing system provides many benefits, not only in facilitating the editorial flow of publishing, but also in supporting the impact of electronic scientific books in the form of indexes and citations as well as visibility of the institution's website domain. Based on the research results, the OMP system is recommended to become the standard for scientific publishers, both R & D institutions and universities. This urgency is especially for books from research that are funded by public, whose usefulness should be felt by the wider community through open access. The ease and potential of OMP in supporting the impact of electronic scientific books is expected to catch up with OJS which has become the standard for publishing electronic scientific journals in Indonesia.

Bahasa Abstract

Penelitian ini mencoba memberikan gambaran bagaimana buku ilmiah akses terbuka dari situs web berbasis OMP di LIPI Press memberikan kontribusi dalam menunjang diseminasi ilmu pengetahuan. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kualitatif deskriptif dengan pengumpulan data melalui studi pustaka dan observasi terhadap sistem OMP LIPI Press, Google Analytics, Google Scholar, dan Dimensions. Penerapan OMP sebagai sistem penerbitan ilmiah memberikan banyak manfaat, tidak hanya memudahkan alur editorial penerbitan, tetapi juga dalam mendukung dampak buku ilmiah elektronik berupa indeks dan sitasi serta visibilitas domain situs web lembaga. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian, sistem OMP direkomendasikan untuk menjadi standar penerbit ilmiah, baik lembaga litbang maupun perguruan tinggi. Urgensi ini terutama untuk buku-buku hasil penelitian yang dibiayai oleh publik yang sudah semestinya kebermanfaatannya dirasakan oleh masyarakat luas melalui akses terbuka. Kemudahan dan potensi OMP dalam mendukung dampak buku ilmiah elektronik diharapkan dapat mengejar ketertinggalannya dengan OJS yang telah menjadi standar penerbitan jurnal ilmiah elektronik di Indonesia.

References

  1. Adema, J., & Schmidt, B. (2010). From service providers to content producers: New opportunities for libraries in collaborative open access book publishing. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 16(SUPPL. 1), 28–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2010.509542
  2. Berlin Declaration. (2008). Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities. Negotium Scientific E-Journal of Management Science, 10(4), 89–91.
  3. Davis, P. M., Lewenstein, B. V., Simon, D. H., Booth, J. G., & Connolly, M. J. L. (2008). Open access publishing, article downloads, and citations: Randomised controlled trial. Bmj, 337(7665), 343–345. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.a568
  4. Eger, T., Mertens, A., & Scheufen, M. (2021). Publication cultures and the citation impact of open access. Managerial and Decision Economics, June, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.3429
  5. Fruin, C. (2019). Finding Our Own Direction: Open Monograph Publishing with Atla, OMP and Editoria. PKP Scholarly Publishing Conference 2019, 1–4. https://editoria.pub/
  6. Gargouri, Y., Larivière, V., Gingras, Y., Carr, L., & Harnad, S. (2012). Green and Gold Open Access Percentages and Growth, by Discipline. http://arxiv.org/abs/1206.3664
  7. Gusenbauer, M., & Haddaway, N. R. (2020). Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta-analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources. Research Synthesis Methods, 11(2), 181–217. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1378
  8. Hacker, A. (2014). Building it together: Collaboration in university-based open access book publishing. Insights: The UKSG Journal, 27(SUPPL. 1), 26–29. https://doi.org/10.1629/2048-7754.120
  9. Harnad, S. (2011). Open access to research. JeDEM, 3(1), 33–41. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.a1051
  10. Harnad, S., Brody, T., Vallières, F., Carr, L., Hitchcock, S., Gingras, Y., Oppenheim, C., Stamerjohanns, H., & Hilf, E. (2004). The green and the gold roads to Open Access. Nature Web Focus.
  11. Haukijärvi, T. (2020). Digital marketing campaign analysis. Hame University of Applied Sciences.
  12. Helmi, R. L., Safitri, M., Fazi, R., Mahelingga, D. E. I. R., Suhendra, M. F., Hartiningsih, R. W., Indrasari, N. P., Kusuma, S. H., Taslima, R. H., Sasiwi, P., Dewi, S. P., Helmiawan, M., & Puspita, A. D. (2019). Pedoman Penerbitan Buku LIPI Press. LIPI Press. https://doi.org/10.14203/press.52
  13. Hermawan, S., Sriyono, S., Hariyanto, W., & Fediyanto, N. (2019). Makna Pemeringkatan dan Peningkatan Kinerja Perguruan Tinggi Perspektif Intellectual Capital. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Dan Bisnis, 14(2), 142–154. https://doi.org/10.24843/jiab.2019.v14.i02.p01
  14. Herzog, C., Hook, D., & Konkiel, S. (2020). Dimensions: Bringing down barriers between scientometricians and data. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(1), 387–395. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00020
  15. Hook, D. W., Porter, S. J., & Herzog, C. (2018). Dimensions: Building Context for Search and Evaluation. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, 3(August), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2018.00023
  16. Hua, F., Sun, H., Walsh, T., Worthington, H., & Glenny, A. M. (2016). Open access to journal articles in dentistry: Prevalence and citation impact. Journal of Dentistry, 47, 41–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2016.02.005
  17. Klump, J., Bertelmann, R., Brase, J., Diepenbroek, M., Grobe, H., Höck, H., Lautenschlager, M., Schindler, U., Sens, I., & Wächter, J. (2006). Data publication in the open access initiative. Data Science Journal, 5(June), 79–83. https://doi.org/10.2481/dsj.5.79
  18. Laakso, M., & Björk, B. C. (2016). Hybrid open access—A longitudinal study. Journal of Informetrics, 10(4), 919–932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2016.08.002
  19. Mahelingga, D. E. I. R. (2020). Penerbitan buku ilmiah daring berbasis open monograph press (OMP). Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan, 16(2), 155–169. https://doi.org/10.22146/bip.v16i1.265
  20. Mahelingga, D. E. I. R. (2021a). Indeks dan Sitasi Buku Ilmiah di Google Scholar. Pustakaloka, 13(1), 22–39. https://doi.org/10.21154/pustakaloka.v13i1.2379
  21. Mahelingga, D. E. I. R. (2021b). Kekuatan Infografis dan Perannya dalam Buku Pangan Fungsional. Baca: Jurnal Dokumentasi Dan Informasi, 42(1), 119–130. https://doi.org/10.14203/j.baca.v42i1.625
  22. Mahelingga, D. E. I. R. (2021c). Webinar dan akses buku elektronik di masa pandemi covid-19. BIBLIOTIKA : Jurnal Kajian Perpustakaan Dan Informasi, 5(1), 12–20.
  23. Mohammad, S. M. (2020). NLP scholar: A dataset for examining the state of NLP research. LREC 2020 - 12th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, Conference Proceedings, 868–877.
  24. Ozaygen, A., Montgomery, L., Neylon, C., Huang, C.-K., Pyne, R., Emery, C., & Lucraft, M. (2020). More readers in more places: The benefits of open access for scholarly books. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4014905
  25. Perdananugraha, G. M. (2012). Studi kasus & pembelajaran penurunan peringkat Webometrics pada Lembaga Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia periode Januari 2012. Seminar Nasional Aplikasi Teknologi Informasi 2012 (SNATI 2012) Yogyakarta, 15-16 Juni 2012.
  26. Philippine Daily Inquirer. (2011). In The Know: Webometrics Ranking of World Universities. Inquirer News. https://newsinfo.inquirer.net/53631/in-the-know-webometrics-ranking-of-world-universities
  27. Popkova, N. (2014). Open Access publishing in Lithuania: Mykolas Romeris University publishing case study. ScieCom Info, 10(1), 2013–2015.
  28. Pyne, R., Emery, C., Lucraft, M., Ozaygen, A., Montgomery, L., & Neylon, C. (2020). Diversifying readership through open access: A usage analysis for OA books (White paper). Springer Nature & COARD. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.12746177
  29. Raju, R. (2017). Altruism as the founding pillar for open monograph publishing in the Global South. IFLA World Library Information Congress, 1–12.
  30. Raju, R., Claassen, J., Pietersen, J., & Abrahamse, D. (2020). An authentic flip subscription model for Africa: library as publisher service. Library Management, 41(6–7), 369–381. https://doi.org/10.1108/LM-03-2020-0054
  31. Ruiz-Vanoye, J. A., Díaz-Parra, O., Fuentes-Penna, A., Ochoa, A., Cámara, R. A. B., & Velez-Díaz, D. (2015). Books Content Manager of Open Access - Open Monograph Press. International Journal of Combinatorial Optimization Problems and Informatics, 6(2), 1–10.
  32. Saputra, G. A. (2020). Penjualan E-Book dan Audio Book Meningkat Selama Pandemi. Media Indonesia. https://mediaindonesia.com/weekend/361901/penjualan-e-book-dan-audio-book-meningkat-selama-pandemi
  33. Sarwar, R., Zia, A., Nawaz, R., Fayoumi, A., Aljohani, N. R., & Hassan, S. U. (2021). Webometrics: evolution of social media presence of universities. Scientometrics, 126(2), 951–967. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03804-y
  34. Sweney, M. (2020). Pandemic drives ebook and audiobook sales by UK publishers to all-time high. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/books/2020/nov/14/pandemic-drives-ebook-and-audiobook-sales-by-uk-publishers-to-all-time-high-covid
  35. Torres-samuel, M., Vásquez, C., Viloria, A., Lis-Gutiérrez, J.-P., Borrero, T. C., & Varela, N. (2018). Web Visibility Profiles of Top100 Latin American Universities. In Y. Tan, Y. Shi, & Q. Tang (Eds.), Data Mining and Big Data DMBD 2018 (pp. 254–262). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93803-5_24
  36. Troyano, J. F. (2013). Discovering Scholarship on the Open Web : Communities and Methods Table of Contents. Pressforward, April, 1–14. http://pressforward.org/discovering-scholarship/
  37. Vásquez, C., Torres Samuel, M., & Viloria Silva, A. J. (2017). Public policies in science and technology in Latin American countries with universities in the top 100 of web ranking. Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 12(11), 2963–2965.
  38. Willinsky, J. (2009). Toward the design of an open monograph press. Journal of Electronic Publishing, 12(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3998/3336451.0012.103
  39. Yu, C. H., Tsai, C. C., Wang, Y., Lai, K. K., & Tajvidi, M. (2020). Towards building a value co-creation circle in social commerce. Computers in Human Behavior, 108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.04.021

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.