•  
  •  
 

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International License.

Abstract

Training is essential to guide and equip SMEs with the necessary skill sets to adapt to the disruption of the COVID-19 pandemic. The budget limitation urged DKI Jakarta Provincial Government (DJPG) to change their conventional training program for SMEs and arrange an IT-based platform enabling all city entities, including private and non-private sectors, to participate in a coproduction scheme. This study employed the performance outcomes framework to examine the impacts of coproduction in entrepreneurship training for SMEs by comparing contract-based and coproduction-based training conducted by DJPG, including the impacts on the deliverables and budget. The results indicate that overall, coproduction-based training is proven to be more efficient, effective, and flexible than contract-based training. This study suggests that coproduction-based training programs deserve to be allocated a significant portion of the government entrepreneurship training agenda while maintaining essential contract-based training programs to ensure the continuity of the government budget in this field.

References

Abeysekera, R., Patton, D., & Mullineux, A. (2015). Co-production in business counselling in microfinance setting: A conceptual approach. Journal of Enterprising Culture, 23(03), 299–319.

Abeysekera, R. (2020). Co-production in BDS: The evidence from the Sri Lankan microfinance sector. Financial Markets, Institutions and Risks, 4(3), 63–71.

Anandhika, M. R., Hassan, F. R., & Nugraha, Y. (2020). Towards a collaborative framework for the large-scale social collaboration: A case of Jakarta's response to the Covid-19 pandemic. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on ICT for Smart Society (ICISS), 7(1), 1-7.

Bovaird, T. (2007). Beyond engagement and participation: User and community coproduction of public services. Public Administration Review, 67(5), 846-860.

Bovaird, T., & Loeffler, E. (2012). We’re all in this together: Harnessing user and community co-production of public outcomes [Discussion Paper]. Institute of Local Government Studies, University of Birmingham, United Kingdom.

Brudney, J. L., & Duncombe, W. D. (1992). An economic evaluation of paid, volunteer, and mixed staffing options for public services. Public Administration Review, 52(5), 474-481.

Coordinating Ministry of Economic Affairs. (2021). UMKM menjadi pilar penting dalam perekonomian Indonesia [In Bahasa Indonesia.] https://ekon.go.id/publikasi/detail/2969/umkm-menjadi-pilar-penting-dalam-perekonomian-indonesia [accessed May 28, 2022].

Fledderus, J., & Honingh, M. (2015). Why people co-produce within activation services: the necessity of motivation and trust - an investigation of selection biases in a municipal activation programme in the Netherlands. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 82(1), 69-87.

Garlatti, A., Fedele, P., Iacuzzi, S., & Garlatti Costa, G. (2019). Coproduction and cost efficiency: A structured literature review. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 32(1), 114–135.

Government of Jakarta. (2021). Presentasi Kolaborasi Sosial Berskala Besar UMKM [In Bahasa Indonesia] [Policy Brief]. Governors Task Force,

Government of Jakarta. Government of Jakarta. (2022a). Data pelatihan kewirausahaan tahun 2018-2022 [In Bahasa Indonesia] [Policy Brief]. The Office of SME, Government of Jakarta.

Government of Jakarta. (2022b). Program Kolaborasi Sosial Berskala Besar UMKM. [In Bahasa Indonesia] https://corona.jakarta.go.id/id/ksbb-umkm [accessed May 27, 2022]

Government of Jakarta. (2022c). APBD DKI Jakarta. [In Bahasa Indonesia] https://apbd.jakarta.go.id/ [accessed May 30, 2022]

Guji, T. N. (2018). The impact of entrepreneurship training on business performance of small and micro enterprises (The case of some selected city administrations-in Oromia Regional State). European Journal of Business and Management, 10(22), 66–71.

Istiandari, R., & Anandhika, M. R. (2019). The role of gender in micro and small enterprise business development in Indonesia: A firm-level analysis [Policy Paper]. Asia Pacific Foundation Canada.

Jakobsen, M., & Andersen, S. C. (2013). Coproduction and equity in public service delivery. Public Administration Review, 73(5), 704-713.

Brix, J., Krogstrup, H. K., & Mortensen, N. M. (2020). Evaluating the outcomes of co-production in local government. Local Government Studies, 46(2), 169–185.

Kasi, V., & Tang, X. (2005). Design attributes and performance outcomes: A framework for comparing business processes. Proceedings of the Eighth Annual Conference of the Southern Association of Information Systems (SAIS), 8(1), 226-232.

Kithae, P. P., Maganjo, R., & Kavinda, L. (2013). Impact of entrepreneurship training on performance of Micro and Small Enterprises (MSES) in Kenya: A case study of Embu Municipality. International Journal of Business and Management Review, 1(2), 1–17.

Loeffler, E., & Bovaird, T. (2016). User and community co-production of public services: What does the evidence tell us?. International Journal of Public Administration, 39(13), 1006-1019.

Loeffler, E. (2021). Co-Production of Public Services and Outcomes (1st ed.). Palgrave Macmillan.

Ministry of Cooperative and SME. (2022, May 29). Dashboard Satu Data KUMKM. [In Bahasa Indonesia] https://satudata.kemenkopukm.go.id/kumkm_dashboard/ [accessed May 29, 2022]

Mullineux, A. W., Akeysekera, R., & Patton, D. (2017). Co-production in business training in microfinance institutions: A conceptual approach. World Review of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, 13(1), 52-68.

Nabatchi, T., Sancino, A., & Sicilia, M. (2017). Varieties of participation in public services: The who, when, and what of coproduction. Public Administration Review, 77(5), 766–776.

Nursini, N. (2020). Micro, small, and medium enterprises (MSMEs) and poverty reduction: Empirical evidence from Indonesia. Development Studies Research, 7(1), 153-166.

Ostrom, E. (1996). Crossing the great divide: Coproduction, synergy, and development. World Development, 24(6), 1073-1087.

Rice, M. P. (2002). Co-production of business assistance in business incubators: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Venturing, 17(2), 163–187.

Roberts, A., Townsend, S., Morris, J., Rushbrooke, E., Greenhill, B., Whitehead, R., & Golding, L. (2013). Treat me right, treat me equal: Using national policy and legislation to create positive changes in local health services for people with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 26(1), 14-25.

Sorrentino, M., Sicilia, M., & Howlett, M. (2018). Understanding co-production as a new public governance tool. Policy and Society, 37(3), 277–293.

Steen, T., & Brandsen, T. (2020). Coproduction during and after the COVID -19 Pandemic: Will It Last? Public Administration Review, 80(5), 851–855.

Taneo, S. Y. M., Noya, S., Melany, M., & Setiyati, E. A. (2022). The role of local government in improving resilience and performance of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises in Indonesia. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 9(3), 245-256

Weerakkody, W., & Ediriweera, A. (2010). Impact of training and development on business performance: with reference to SMEs in Gampaha District. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Business Management, 7(1), 82-96.

Additional Files
authorship-statement_Fazlur Rahman Hassan.pdf (337 kB)
authorship-statement
Download

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.