Abstract
Being at the threshold offers an ambiguous spatial experience. The idea of threshold is relevant to the discourse of interiority, as it expands our understanding of the opposing condition of inside-outside, or interior-exterior, which have become the recurring themes in many discussions on interiority. This issue of Interiority attempts to address what actually occurs at the threshold – the occupation and the experience of the threshold. The contributors in this issue address the emergence of spatial ideas that define the new relationship between inside and outside, between interior and architecture.
Publication Date
7-30-2019
References
Blundell Jones, P. (2015). The primacy of bodily experience. In P. Blundell Jones & M. Meagher (Eds.), Architecture and movement: The dynamic experience of buildings and landscapes (pp. 96-101). London: Routledge.
Boettger, T. (2014). Threshold spaces: Transitions in architecture - analysis and design tools. Basel: Birkhäuser.
Bollnow, O. F. (2011). Human space (W. Kohlhammer, Trans.). London: Hyphen Press. (Original work published 1963)
Perec, G. (2008). Species of spaces and other pieces (J. Sturrock, Trans.). London: Penguin Books. (Original work published 1974)
Simmel, G. (1994). Bridge and door. Theory, Culture & Society, 11, 5-10.
Stoner, J. (2012). Toward a minor architecture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Weinthal, L. (Ed.) (2011). Toward a new interior: An anthology of interior design theory. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.
First Page
107
Last Page
111
Recommended Citation
Atmodiwirjo, P., & Yatmo, Y. A. (2019). Interiority: At the Threshold. Interiority, 2 (2), 107-111. https://doi.org/10.7454/in.v2i2.66
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Author(s) retain the copyright of articles published in this journal, with first publication rights granted to Interiority.
